Kaeseman or normall B+W polarizer
Posted 08/05/2009 - 14:47
Link
Stefan, on my DA* 50-135 I use a Hoya Pro1 Digital Filter, it has a low profile frame. I have had no problems with it.
The older I get the faster I was.
Dave
K-3 II, K10D, DA16-85, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA18-55, DA 50, Sigma EX DG 70mm Macro, Sigma 70-300mm, Sigma DG 120-400mm APO HSM.
Metz 58 AF-1.
My Flickr link
Dave
K-3 II, K10D, DA16-85, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA18-55, DA 50, Sigma EX DG 70mm Macro, Sigma 70-300mm, Sigma DG 120-400mm APO HSM.
Metz 58 AF-1.
My Flickr link
Posted 08/05/2009 - 14:58
Link
Thank you Dave, I know that Hoya is very good as well but I already have an B+W and it's lovely to work with. If polarizers wouldn't be as expensive I would have tried them but since they aren't I simply want to buy one I know I won't be disapointed.
You said you've a low profile (slim) filter but that isn't needed right?
You said you've a low profile (slim) filter but that isn't needed right?
Stefan
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Posted 09/05/2009 - 17:07
Link
Well I've orded the Kaesemann, since it seems that no one on this forum has one I'll make a small comparison with a normall B+W.
Stefan
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
10412 posts
18 years
Dordrecht,
the Netherlands
Schneider does explain somethings, they are talking about a higher efficiency, better cemented and sealed edges.
They cost roughly the same so think I will go for the KSM but I'm curious about your experience with them, I've a normall B+W for the other lenses so I know they preform very well.
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ