K5IIs and PF?
Posted 17/11/2012 - 07:32
Link
I would imagine it's down to the individual lens to determine the mount of PF, just like the amount of CA
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 17/11/2012 - 14:34
Link
Smeggypants wrote:
I would imagine it's down to the individual lens to determine the mount of PF, just like the amount of CA
I would expect to agree with you, but it appears that the lens, scene and lighting are common, so the only change is the body, the suggestion being that the AA filter seems involved in the production of PF.I would imagine it's down to the individual lens to determine the mount of PF, just like the amount of CA
Returning to the thread in question, (link), a few more views have been posted, suggesting there's a little more to the IIs than first thought, in addition to this alleged reduction in PF, i.e. that it's SR is good for an additional stop, although it's not clear whether this is against the K-5 'Classic' or II.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2469 posts
17 years
South London
Anyone with a K-5IIs care to comment?