K5 What a Genius
Posted 30/12/2011 - 22:13
Link
fatspider wrote:
Can we all make a new year resolution please:
Not to knock the competition (at least without using emoticons)
I find this rather strange- who is the competition? Presumably Canon Nikon etc..????- that makes us Pentax in some way- clearly not the case, i just own some of their gear- just like I have a Volvo and not a Ford.Can we all make a new year resolution please:
Not to knock the competition (at least without using emoticons)
I would think "the competition" are all other photographers if that's how you view it.
Unless you are a Pentax shareholder, in which case ignore the above.
Posted 30/12/2011 - 22:27
Link
The K5 is truly awesome.
I have decided, and told my partner that I simply have no excuses any more! The weakest link is definitely me
I have decided, and told my partner that I simply have no excuses any more! The weakest link is definitely me
Posted 02/01/2012 - 19:27
Link
japers45 wrote:
I would think "the competition" are all other photographers if that's how you view it.
Unless you are a Pentax shareholder, in which case ignore the above.
But sadly my perception since having owned a Pentax and reading forums and flickr groups is that a fair number of Pentax owners do seem to have a chip on their shoulder in this regard - just look at the number of mentions of "Canikon" ... now I've been interested in photography for around 30 years and have never heard of such a brand.fatspider wrote:
Can we all make a new year resolution please:
Not to knock the competition (at least without using emoticons)
I find this rather strange- who is the competition? Presumably Canon Nikon etc..????- that makes us Pentax in some way- clearly not the case, i just own some of their gear- just like I have a Volvo and not a Ford.Can we all make a new year resolution please:
Not to knock the competition (at least without using emoticons)
I would think "the competition" are all other photographers if that's how you view it.
Unless you are a Pentax shareholder, in which case ignore the above.
when Canon and Nikon devotees have a pop to me, and I could be mistaken, it always seems good natured and tongue in cheek banter .. it feels rather different with the Pentax Fanboys.
I like stuff about my K200D , I love my 50D's and loved the 400D before I broke it.
The 500D jury is still out and K5 similar - handling, design, layout etc fab ... results not decided for certain yet.
- -
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Posted 02/01/2012 - 20:25
Link
Quote:
when Canon and Nikon devotees have a pop to me, and I could be mistaken, it always seems good natured and tongue in cheek banter .. it feels rather different with the Pentax Fanboys.
Hence my suggestion we all use emoticons when slagging off the competition, it's then perfectly clear that it's meant tongue in cheek (to most people at least) Lets rise above this belief that Pentax owners have a chip on their shoulders.when Canon and Nikon devotees have a pop to me, and I could be mistaken, it always seems good natured and tongue in cheek banter .. it feels rather different with the Pentax Fanboys.
And one final thought, Remember that mud sticks........
......but with a K5 you can wash it off
Posted 02/01/2012 - 21:09
Link
My first digital camera was an ION. I believe it was the very first digital camera, albeit it recorded stills in analogue video. Then I bought the Mk2 version. Guess they are collectors items now.
Previous to that I had had a brief skirmish with a Zenith SLR followed ASAP by an ESII, ME, MX and K2. I got CBA (a similar affliction to LBA!)
I've still got them all. Eventually I wanted a DSLR and the best buy looked to be an EOS300D. But I was never overly keen on it and missed using my array of old PK lenses. To replace these with modern Canon equivalents would have broken the bank. Then one day I spotted an ad in the paper for a K100D on special offer. It was reasonable and I bought it on spec just to use my old lenses. Then having used it I thought the resultant photos from the standard lens blew away what I was getting from the 300D. I did some lens comparison tests and found the standard Pentax zoom was a great lens compared to the Canon equivalent. LBA and CBA then recommenced with a K-m, a K200D, a Samsung 20D and now a K-5. If Canon had provided a half decent standard lens I may well have stuck with them. Even their prosumer zoom paled to the Pentax equivalent. I'm sure the best of Canon is good but not the ones I had! What's more, while I was saving up for the newer Pentax digital lenses I had a good range of old ones I could use in the meantime. It seemed a much better bet.
I think Pentax lost their way in the ist era when these cameras looked pretty pricy for a plasticy looking camera, nothing like my old ME/MX etc. From the K series I reckon Pentax got back on track and agree with the OP that the K-5 is indeed genius! I wouldn't want any other DSLR apart from perhaps a full frame K-?? that is no larger than the K-5. I'd love a full frame DSLR but not one of those huge things that I could if I wanted go out and buy today. So let's hope the progress continues.
John
Previous to that I had had a brief skirmish with a Zenith SLR followed ASAP by an ESII, ME, MX and K2. I got CBA (a similar affliction to LBA!)
I've still got them all. Eventually I wanted a DSLR and the best buy looked to be an EOS300D. But I was never overly keen on it and missed using my array of old PK lenses. To replace these with modern Canon equivalents would have broken the bank. Then one day I spotted an ad in the paper for a K100D on special offer. It was reasonable and I bought it on spec just to use my old lenses. Then having used it I thought the resultant photos from the standard lens blew away what I was getting from the 300D. I did some lens comparison tests and found the standard Pentax zoom was a great lens compared to the Canon equivalent. LBA and CBA then recommenced with a K-m, a K200D, a Samsung 20D and now a K-5. If Canon had provided a half decent standard lens I may well have stuck with them. Even their prosumer zoom paled to the Pentax equivalent. I'm sure the best of Canon is good but not the ones I had! What's more, while I was saving up for the newer Pentax digital lenses I had a good range of old ones I could use in the meantime. It seemed a much better bet.
I think Pentax lost their way in the ist era when these cameras looked pretty pricy for a plasticy looking camera, nothing like my old ME/MX etc. From the K series I reckon Pentax got back on track and agree with the OP that the K-5 is indeed genius! I wouldn't want any other DSLR apart from perhaps a full frame K-?? that is no larger than the K-5. I'd love a full frame DSLR but not one of those huge things that I could if I wanted go out and buy today. So let's hope the progress continues.
John
John K
Posted 02/01/2012 - 22:14
Link
My Canon shooting work mate calls my K5 a toy camera and not a real mans camera. All tongue in cheek of course
Posted 02/01/2012 - 23:35
Link
Why do togs talk about other brands of camera`s on a Pentax site,it would seem a site dedicated to their brand would give them more information.
Posted 02/01/2012 - 23:42
Link
Quote:
My Canon shooting work mate calls my K5 a toy camera and not a real mans camera. All tongue in cheek of course
My Canon shooting work mate calls my K5 a toy camera and not a real mans camera. All tongue in cheek of course
Quote:
Probably by size comparison it looks it! He's jealous!
You meant your K5 is bigger than his.........
Probably by size comparison it looks it! He's jealous!
Posted 03/01/2012 - 08:58
Link
The funny thing is that Holga are very much in fashion. Toys are fun!
Posted 05/01/2012 - 10:51
Link
judderman62 wrote:
But sadly my perception since having owned a Pentax and reading forums and flickr groups is that a fair number of Pentax owners do seem to have a chip on their shoulder in this regard - just look at the number of mentions of "Canikon" ... now I've been interested in photography for around 30 years and have never heard of such a brand.
AFAIN But sadly my perception since having owned a Pentax and reading forums and flickr groups is that a fair number of Pentax owners do seem to have a chip on their shoulder in this regard - just look at the number of mentions of "Canikon" ... now I've been interested in photography for around 30 years and have never heard of such a brand.
The term Canikon is a courtesy to Canon and Nikon owners so that web searches don't throw up hundreds of non related results from Pentaxians talking twaddle.
If you look hard enough you can always find 'reds under the bed' but most often its in your mind
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1252 posts
20 years
Gunnerton