K-x is so versatile
Posted 05/02/2010 - 20:38
Link
Peter, I have to agree: there is, of course plenty of noise, but it's "nice" noise and certainly suits the subject here. The colours remain so vibrant. What's it like at ASA400, my default "winter" speed?
Clearly a good camera...something to which to aspire...and save-up for!
I'd love to bolt one of my old lenses on the front and take it for a walk.
Looking forward to seeing more shots.
Andrew
Clearly a good camera...something to which to aspire...and save-up for!
I'd love to bolt one of my old lenses on the front and take it for a walk.
Looking forward to seeing more shots.
Andrew
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 05/02/2010 - 20:39
Link
Of course it can.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/121706792J1WOvM7tIMGP0869.jpg[/IMG]
It does indeed look very good, did you do some PP on it and was it RAW or in JPG?
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/121706792J1WOvM7tIMGP0869.jpg[/IMG]
It does indeed look very good, did you do some PP on it and was it RAW or in JPG?
Stefan
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Posted 05/02/2010 - 20:50
Link
Sorry, I could have said - it is JPEG and the only PP was to adjust levels inwards a tad in Elements.
regards
regards
K-X Fa77, DA70, M50 f1.7, A50 f1.7, CZJ Sonnar 135 f3.5
Posted 05/02/2010 - 22:34
Link
Nice job on the NR Anvh. Which program did you use?
And BTW Peter... yup, pretty amazing for 12800 ASA.
K.
And BTW Peter... yup, pretty amazing for 12800 ASA.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 05/02/2010 - 22:51
Link
Well here's my shot at it, my highest iso was 1600 so this is pretty good with a bit of PP,
Jack.
[IMG]http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq253/jackitec/Image1-1.jpg[/IMG]
Jack.
[IMG]http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq253/jackitec/Image1-1.jpg[/IMG]
Posted 05/02/2010 - 22:54
Link
Kris, I first used Neat Image but that was too aggressive with the finer details and got too blurred so I used Topaz Denoise. I first didn't like it since the older version created patterns but the new version is better and I also sharpened it a bit.
Jack what program did you used, Noise Ninja?
I think you've pushed it a bit too far
Jack what program did you used, Noise Ninja?
I think you've pushed it a bit too far
Stefan
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Posted 05/02/2010 - 22:58
Link
PeterABC wrote:
Hand held in low light, iso 12800 1/50 f3.5 can't get better than this.
regards
With a Pentax you are correct.Hand held in low light, iso 12800 1/50 f3.5 can't get better than this.
regards
Regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 05/02/2010 - 23:52
Link
Yes Stefan I agree it was Paint shop pro x2 it's over sharpened
Jack.
Jack.
Posted 06/02/2010 - 05:59
Link
Mike-P wrote:
Yes, I absolutely agree.K10D wrote:
With a Pentax you are correct.
I think you could possibly say with a crop sensor camera.With a Pentax you are correct.
Regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 06/02/2010 - 17:22
Link
Here's a Neat Image effort at default settings.
http://i.pbase.com/o2/37/932637/1/121725811.5DKqdlWM.121706792.J1WOvM7t.IMGP0869...
http://i.pbase.com/o2/37/932637/1/121725811.5DKqdlWM.121706792.J1WOvM7t.IMGP0869...
K-X Fa77, DA70, M50 f1.7, A50 f1.7, CZJ Sonnar 135 f3.5
Posted 06/02/2010 - 18:08
Link
Same session at my mate's gaff after a bottle or two.
This time at iso3200. Levels adjusted in Elements and default Neat Image,
1/125 f3.5
I love this camera
regards
Peter
This time at iso3200. Levels adjusted in Elements and default Neat Image,
1/125 f3.5
I love this camera
regards
Peter
K-X Fa77, DA70, M50 f1.7, A50 f1.7, CZJ Sonnar 135 f3.5
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
15 posts
16 years
regards