K-1 MKII ISO Comparison
Posted 22/02/2018 - 19:03
Link
Admittedly that is impressive.
Posted 22/02/2018 - 20:32
Link
Mike, where does that image come from? Maybe the site has a larger image I can look at. It is tiny to me.
But the difference certainly looks impressive.
But the difference certainly looks impressive.
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 22/02/2018 - 22:44
Link
That is impressive. Is that with Pixelshift as well?
Posted 23/02/2018 - 08:43
Link
If that is typical, then I'd have to be interested in that!
For those that were wondering about what the K-1 looked like at 12,800, and why I wouldn't use 12,800 for gig photography, then perhaps this comparison makes it obvious!
For those that were wondering about what the K-1 looked like at 12,800, and why I wouldn't use 12,800 for gig photography, then perhaps this comparison makes it obvious!
This space deliberately left blank.
Posted 23/02/2018 - 09:06
Link
It does and it doesn't darkskies, because gigs are usually brightly lit in the places that count. Even the MX-1 sensor doesn't show excessive noise at ISO 12,800 when the light is bright enough. It's the dark shadows that exaggerate it, as in the sample image. That's my experience anyway, although there are many different types of venue I guess.
Best regards, John
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
13626 posts
16 years
Hythe,
Hampshire UK
Due to archaic forum sizing rules please click on picture to see a proper comparison.
Pentax K-1 MARK II ISO 12800 by Mike.Pursey, on Flickr