Isle of Skye
Posted 24/09/2010 - 19:24
Link
Posted 24/09/2010 - 19:34
Link
Posted 24/09/2010 - 19:41
Link
A lovely set. The last two in particular are delightful.
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 24/09/2010 - 19:55
Link
Very nice, I also like the last two landscapes.
It's the building in the first three that doesn't work for me.
It's the building in the first three that doesn't work for me.
Posted 24/09/2010 - 19:59
Link
It is always interesting how other people see your images, I quite like the light on the light house but photography is such a subjective thing. Thanks for the comments David & Stefan. I still have another 808 image to wade through, fear not I have no intention of uploading the lot
Posted 24/09/2010 - 20:03
Link
Technoblurb wrote:
It is always interesting how other people see your images, I quite like the light on the light house but photography is such a subjective thing.
Indeed the light is beautiful, it's the composition for me.It is always interesting how other people see your images, I quite like the light on the light house but photography is such a subjective thing.
The building is now really bordered by the rockscape and doesn't have much sky around it, if you took it with a wider lens or further back I think I would have liked it better.
Posted 24/09/2010 - 20:09
Link
Thanks Stefan, I very nearly purchased a Sigma 10-20mm before going away this year, this would have give me that wider feel. Standing further back was not an option, without diving gear that is .
Posted 24/09/2010 - 21:10
Link
You could have stitch photos together of course.
I like the second one, if you could have stitch a photo onto it on the right side so you didn't cut the building it might have worked.
What do you think of this?
Added some sky and removed a bit from the bottom, sorry about the colours but I liked the preset
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/IMGP2563-800-x-533-screen1.jpg[/IMG]
I like the second one, if you could have stitch a photo onto it on the right side so you didn't cut the building it might have worked.
What do you think of this?
Added some sky and removed a bit from the bottom, sorry about the colours but I liked the preset
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/IMGP2563-800-x-533-screen1.jpg[/IMG]
Posted 25/09/2010 - 07:13
Link
Thanks for that Stefan, I see what you mean by increasing the sky. I am currently trying to improve my basic composition at the moment and have set myself the challenge of no alteration to the composition. I will have a look through the rest of my pictures and see if I have anything near to this.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.





1347 posts
17 years
Somewhere at the back of my mind
Neist Point Light House I
Neist Point Light House II
Neist Point Light House III