Image Stabilizing
Posted 25/02/2010 - 20:06
Link
I would guess use one or the other but not both! As to which is better, who knows but labnut's review in another thread suggests the Pentax system is pretty effective.
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 25/02/2010 - 20:10
Link
Thanks Kris
Pentax Km and kit lens 18-55mm, Sigma 70-300 apo, manfrotto 190xprob.
Posted 25/02/2010 - 20:22
Link
The two systems would clash, so you have to choose one or the other.
Some say lens stabilisation works better than camera SR, and it has the advantage of stabilising the viewfinder image as well as the photograph. It does make the lens significantly more expensive and heavier, though.
Not all Sigma's OS lenses are available in Pentax versions, though I think some of the new ones are.
Some say lens stabilisation works better than camera SR, and it has the advantage of stabilising the viewfinder image as well as the photograph. It does make the lens significantly more expensive and heavier, though.
Not all Sigma's OS lenses are available in Pentax versions, though I think some of the new ones are.
~Pete
Posted 25/02/2010 - 21:02
Link
Thanks Pete
Pentax Km and kit lens 18-55mm, Sigma 70-300 apo, manfrotto 190xprob.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
25 posts
16 years
Suffolk
Thanks Colin