Harleys

aliengrove
Posted 09/05/2010 - 20:48 Link
This is a few I took last weekend at a Harley Davidson meeting in Doha. C+C welcome!

The Pearl

Comment Image

Custom Harley

Comment Image



Detail of custom Harley

Comment Image


Hog

Comment Image
Smeggypants
Posted 09/05/2010 - 20:54 Link
Love the first Harley shot 'from behind' - Would have looked good shot from ground level too!
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Mike-P
Posted 09/05/2010 - 21:20 Link
Very nice, last is the one for me though.
Suits the mono conversion perfectly.
ems82
Posted 09/05/2010 - 23:06 Link
Lovely set last one is super
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
SteveT
Posted 10/05/2010 - 14:11 Link
2 & 4 both nice, nice angle on 2 but i find the background slightly distracting. 4 is nicely balanced and good use of dof
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
thoughton
Posted 10/05/2010 - 14:16 Link
2 and 4 for me!

Number 1 looks a bit odd, like HDR gone a bit wrong.

And while I like 4, it does look a bit like that blur was added in PP. The bike seems too have too much DOF for that amount of OOF background?
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 10/05/2010 - 14:17
Mongoose
Posted 10/05/2010 - 14:30 Link
I agree with Tim, last one screams "PP background blur" to me.

That PP technique is VERY hard to make look natural, I've played with it many times and only got it to work in a way I liked once.

The trouble is, the edges are hard to do acurately and even if you get it spot on the subject ends up looking cut out and stuck on (as here, particularly around the handlebars and the top of the fuel tank). Also the subject (which hasn't been blured) ends up looking much more noisy than the background.

You may find you can make it look better by bluring the edges of your mask slightly (assuming you're making one blured layer and one plain one, then masking one onto the other). Also consider adding some artificial noise to the background. Lastly consider toning down the level of background blur a bit. It wants to be just enough to make the viewer look at the bike without making him/her think about the background, because whatever you do you'll never make the bokeh look like a lens produced it.


Sorry, I've rather focused on the shot I don't like in its current form but I hope I've been helpful. The other two bike shots are pretty cool and I like the engine close up particularly.
you don't have to be mad to post here



but it does help
aliengrove
Posted 10/05/2010 - 18:29 Link
Thanks for the comments! The first shot is actually pretty much as it came out of the camera, with only selective levels altered. I agree with Thoughton's comment though, that it looks a bit like hdr gone wrong, but not sure why!

The mono has a bit of gaussian blur on the background, maybe I overdid it a bit. It was masked with Vertus. How do I go about blurring the edges of a mask? Not tried that before. I wanted to blur the background as it was a bit distracting, and I wanted to crop the shot without appearing to cut off the rear of the other bike. The bike itself is so cool that I didn't want any distraction from it. Likewise the second shot's background is distracting, but I did not think I could do anything about that except blur it a bit with the blur tool.

It's great to get feedback, and hopefully it helps me to get it right next time!
bwlchmawr
Posted 10/05/2010 - 18:40 Link
Last one is best, despite the clumsy pp. Just goes to show how important it is to get things as right as possible in camera. Like the old days...I'm a right one to talk!

Regards,

Andrew

P.S. Sorry for people still using film, it's not the old days for you!
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo