Got Gerri some flowers yesterday.
Posted 19/02/2011 - 16:03
Link
Nice shot I like the way the glasses come alive
Your wasted as a Flower Buyer
Your wasted as a Flower Buyer
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 19/02/2011 - 16:20
Link
Algernon wrote:
Nice shot I like the way the glasses come alive
Your wasted as a Flower Buyer
maybe I just got carried away with the lighting and didn't present the flowers in the best composition..Nice shot I like the way the glasses come alive
Your wasted as a Flower Buyer
they are actually a nice arraignment... lots of color but made to lay low in a rectangular container. nice on a table as it doesn't block your view or get knocked over when pouring the wine!
this BTW is shot with a k10 and 35 f2.4 lens at f22.
lighting was actually hard lighting done well so it looks softer than it really was...
gridded reflector from the top...
gridded snoot from behind....
ringflash for contrast control...
bare reflector throu a cookie on the backdrop, which is a plastic table cloth.
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 19/02/2011 - 16:23
Link
Beautiful. Superb lighting & I love the way the background complements / makes the shot.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Posted 19/02/2011 - 16:37
Link
cardiff_gareth wrote:
Love the lighting, reflection in the glass cut down to a minimum. You like me then buy the other half flowers for love......I mean, to use as a photographic subjecy
Whats the numbers at the top mean :
When I decided to pursue more corporate gigs, esp with the video, I decided to incorporate. It is a numbered corporation.Love the lighting, reflection in the glass cut down to a minimum. You like me then buy the other half flowers for love......I mean, to use as a photographic subjecy
Whats the numbers at the top mean :
When I make 10 million dollars on my first feature film, corporations pay less income tax than peoples.
The flowers were actually a gift... I was filming a web show for a designer and we had a florist for a guest.
She gave us the arrangement after they made it on the show.
I plastered the logo and copy right on it as I may decide to publish this one later.. haven't decided yet....
anybody wondering how the 35 2.4 performs? the 13x19 inch print is very nice and at f22 that was outside the lens's sweet spot of f 5.6-8
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 19/02/2011 - 16:46
Link
Don wrote:
anybody wondering how the 35 2.4 performs? the 13x119 inch print is very nice and at f22 that was outside the lens's sweet spot of f 5.6-8
Bloody hell .... that's a helluva print !
anybody wondering how the 35 2.4 performs? the 13x119 inch print is very nice and at f22 that was outside the lens's sweet spot of f 5.6-8
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Posted 19/02/2011 - 16:47
Link
Frogfish wrote:
yeah I fixed that typo...lol!
Don wrote:
anybody wondering how the 35 2.4 performs? the 13x119 inch print is very nice and at f22 that was outside the lens's sweet spot of f 5.6-8
Bloody hell .... that's a helluva print !anybody wondering how the 35 2.4 performs? the 13x119 inch print is very nice and at f22 that was outside the lens's sweet spot of f 5.6-8
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 20/02/2011 - 01:21
Link
As above Don.
A professionally executed shot.
Best regards
A professionally executed shot.
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 20/02/2011 - 01:30
Link
I got that lens new for $169.00 cdn at London Drugs, they just happened to have a sale that day we went in....
I will post a portrait I'm shooting (model is doing her make-up right now) tonite.... which I'll also shoot with the 35 2.4....
I will post a portrait I'm shooting (model is doing her make-up right now) tonite.... which I'll also shoot with the 35 2.4....
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 20/02/2011 - 03:01
Link
Nice light. I'm not convinced her right arm should be in shot or at least up high in the shot Don. It draws my eyes away from the arm, tattoo and eyes (in that order).
Best regards
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
6213 posts
20 years
Winterpeg Manitoba Canada