Folkestone

ems82
Posted 29/04/2010 - 21:18 Link
Here is a set from yesterday.
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6518.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6517.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6511.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6493.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6491.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6489.jpg[/IMG]
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
bwlchmawr
Posted 29/04/2010 - 21:39 Link
A most interesing set, Ems.

The first one needs a bit of levelling but the strong graphic shapes of the others are very pleasing.

Something strange has happened to the sky in the sea scape but I rather like the grainy effect.

The three scrubby old boats are my favourite.

Did you use the "new" 28mm?

Best wishes,

A.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
ems82
Posted 29/04/2010 - 21:42 Link
Yes I did use the 28mm think I used the 18-55 for the door shot though cant remember.Thanks for your comments Andrew I added Grain to that shot not sure if I like it or not
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
ems82
Posted 29/04/2010 - 21:44 Link
The last one I had an attempt at vignetting first try the original is rather crap in a word but I really liked the composistion etc of shot. Maybe worth another try at PP with it?
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
thoughton
Posted 29/04/2010 - 22:53 Link
Yes, the three boats is a very pleasing composition.

The first harbour image is too grey. Looks like too much highlight reduction?

The first boardwalk shot is a bit grainy for my taste. The second one is much more like it, interesting shape, but I would crop out that messy line of shrubbery at the very top and have the boardwalk leaving the frame at the corner.

Having said that my favourite is easily the final shot. I really like it rather a lot! The slender boardwalk and solitary man give it a haunting atmosphere. Great composition in this one as well. The sky looks a bit odd on my screen, like some kind of oval mosaic effect in the centre of the image. Fix the sky and this one will be a winner. It could be a postcard, or an album cover. A really excellent image! Wish I'd taken it

PS The vignette was a great idea, just need to sort out those ovals!
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 29/04/2010 - 22:59
Dr. Mhuni
Posted 30/04/2010 - 02:12 Link
I find they all hold some interest other than the first, which I'm not keen on. However, to my eye the detail's not quite right in them - perhaps you have had to do too much work on them in PP? The detail in the sky in the first for eg., on the boats in the third, or the sky in the fourth, and stones in 4, 5 + 6.

Compostionally I like 4 & 6 best. THe undulations in the path in 4 are nice and if there was a bit more detail and less obvious pp this could be a really nice shot. A figure on the path would be great. 6 has potential as Tim says. Have you pasted in the sky - the effect looks quite intentional to me? You might hang on to this until you have a more suitable sky to use - looks like it would be quite easy to replace the sky here (though I have not yet done this myself!). Doesn't it need straightening though - seems so to me.
Mhuni

500px
K10D
Posted 30/04/2010 - 08:46 Link
Number 4 is my favourite.

A good set.

Keep them coming.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
i-Berg
Posted 30/04/2010 - 08:57 Link
3, 4 and 6 for me Emma, each has some element to recommend them.
bwlchmawr
Posted 30/04/2010 - 09:49 Link
Hope you didn't mind my having a go with that nice harbour scene, Ems...[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/ems1.jpg[/IMG]

I think this is a bit brighter.

Regards,

Andrew
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
ems82
Posted 30/04/2010 - 10:25 Link
Well thankyou all for your encouraging comments,means alot. I will have another play in PP with them when I get my own computer back using a friends at mo. Andrew your one is alot brighter and better what did you do?
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
ems82
Posted 30/04/2010 - 10:35 Link
No 6 was such a bad photo it was the first shot of the day and I forgot to change any settings this is original.sooooooooo bad. But I really love it
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/IMGP6489-1.jpg[/IMG]
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
DrOrloff
Posted 30/04/2010 - 11:09 Link
My hometown. It's been a long time since I went down to the harbour area but the last time I did it had become blighted and desperate, much worse than in my day and that was pretty bad. I think Roger de Haan's money has sent the area up a notch or two, but I like the dark graininess of the images as it suits my recollections. I like number 6 a lot.
mikew
Posted 30/04/2010 - 12:33 Link
Emma are you saying that you used the washed out example above to create number 6? If so then IMO you really should get into the habit of checking shots as you take them and (you'll not like me for saying this) deleting shots that are technically terrible rather than try to 'recover' them. Don't you glance at the histogram while shooting?

What settings did you leave the camera on? I always put the camera away on AF, ISO 100, either Av or Tv, zero EV adjust etc. so that when I pick it up next time I know the starting point. Easily done as you can do it after uploading the images to the PC. Smug git aren't I?

Mike
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
bwlchmawr
Posted 30/04/2010 - 13:31 Link
Emms,
I can't believe you don't glance at the back screen after each shot. You might was well be using film and waiting for the disasters to come back from the chemists!

Make sure you have the histogram over laying the scene: it's the most important thing, in my opinion. You very rarely get out of focus shots with the small sensors our cameras employ and the relaibility of autofocus. But exposure is another matter.

I levelled your picture then selected the cloud in the sky and darkened the cloud. Finally I ran the dodge brush over all highlights.

Best wishes,

Andrew

P.S. Your recovery work was astonishing given the thinness of the digital negative!
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Gwyn
Posted 30/04/2010 - 14:23 Link
I rarely chimp. My screen is switched off most of the time. I only check if there is tricky lighting tbh, so I can quite understand Emma not checking.

I actually like the washed out version - very surreal and other worldly.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo