First pictures with the pentax LX
Posted 13/04/2017 - 08:53
Link
Nice shots, the first lacks a little contrast but the rest are great. Personally I don't believe digital can replicate b&w film exactly, close but never quite.
Posted 13/04/2017 - 09:05
Link
These are great... really like the last one in particular... nice clean lines...
Best
Best
Posted 13/04/2017 - 10:04
Link
all good...Love no 2.
K-1Gripped K-1 ungripped K-5ii K7 Various lenses
Stuart..
Stuart..
Posted 13/04/2017 - 11:48
Link
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 13/04/2017 - 11:51
Link
pschlute wrote:
Thanks for the comments. I have upped the contrast for the first.... better I think ?
Yes, much better.
Thanks for the comments. I have upped the contrast for the first.... better I think ?
Posted 13/04/2017 - 11:55
Link
pschlute wrote:
Thanks for the comments. I have upped the contrast for the first.... better I think ?

To me that isn't so good and its gone the wrong way. Sorry to take a liberty but played around with the iage myself and managed to get more detail in the sky which I feel helps. Obviously from the original file still more could be achieved.Thanks for the comments. I have upped the contrast for the first.... better I think ?


Don't know what you think!
John K
Posted 13/04/2017 - 13:57
Link
Thanks john, more detail in the sky helps for sure, and you have brought out more detail in the sculpture, but that has introduced lack of contrast and the grain is more prominent.
I will have another go when I get time. This is my first go at digitally editing a b+w scan, I shall google some tips.
I will have another go when I get time. This is my first go at digitally editing a b+w scan, I shall google some tips.
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 13/04/2017 - 14:46
Link
Grain is what black and white film is all about, without it there would be no photograph. The lighting when the photograph was taken appears rather flat which hasn't helped the contrast.
Did you expose the negative for the shadows which is the opposite what you'd normally do with reversal photography, be that slides or digital?
Did you expose the negative for the shadows which is the opposite what you'd normally do with reversal photography, be that slides or digital?
John K
Posted 13/04/2017 - 21:42
Link
alfpics wrote:
Great use of your new 'toy'! Was the film home processed?
No Andy, my darkroom days are long gone. i sent it to Ilford who process and scan. They send a download link for the files which are 4547*3047 pixels.Great use of your new 'toy'! Was the film home processed?
i was very happy with the LX, it certainly is not showing its age, except for when pressing the shutter button i had to keep still for a second or two until the mirror decided to move (LX sticky mirror syndrome).
Next one to try is my recently purchased Super-A !
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 13/04/2017 - 21:52
Link
JAK wrote:
Did you expose the negative for the shadows which is the opposite what you'd normally do with reversal photography, be that slides or digital?
i exposed for the figure (shadow ) but with -1 stop compensation if I remember.
Did you expose the negative for the shadows which is the opposite what you'd normally do with reversal photography, be that slides or digital?
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 13/04/2017 - 22:20
Link
Nice set Peter.
Mmm an lx.
No must resist.
Mmm an lx.
No must resist.
I know what i like, If not always why.
Posted 13/04/2017 - 22:32
Link
derek897 wrote:
Nice set Peter.
Mmm an lx.
No must resist.
Keep your eyes peeled on ebay. I picked mine up for £225 including a m 50mm f4 macro, which I then sold for £75.
Nice set Peter.
Mmm an lx.
No must resist.
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


5157 posts
20 years
Surrey
My Flickr page