First K20D Macro
Posted 04/05/2008 - 13:35
Link
Looks great to me.
How do you keep these 'critters' still long enough to photograph them :
I have been experimenting with macro for the first time this morning and manual focussing on something that is static is difficult enough
How do you keep these 'critters' still long enough to photograph them :
I have been experimenting with macro for the first time this morning and manual focussing on something that is static is difficult enough
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 04/05/2008 - 14:55
Link
It's certainly tricky. I only use MF and manual metering all set up in advance. I then use a monopod with a ball head and the macro at the minimum (shirtest) focus and wander around looking for likely candidates, lowering and raising the monopod as I go.
Once spotted, I get the thing in the viewfinder and move the ensemble back and forth until it looks in focus and then hit the button. Success rate is probably around 0-20% for the tiniest insects, up to 50-80% for the "larger" flies and bugs.
I've tried in the past with a tripod, but as you say, they're gone long before I can get setup and usually end up knocking everything about getting the legs right.
Interestingly I found a use for the Liveview preview of the K20D and it was interesting using the technique above while watching the LCD. The main problem with it, though, was the appreciable delay between hitting the shutter release and it actually happening. It seems like the camera has to lower the mirror again (from liveview), raise it again (take the picture), then lower it again (finish). I'd understand why if I didn't have everything in Manual. The time it takes is too long to hold the camera steady.
It would work great on a tripod with a remote release, but then I'm back to lugging that lot around
Once spotted, I get the thing in the viewfinder and move the ensemble back and forth until it looks in focus and then hit the button. Success rate is probably around 0-20% for the tiniest insects, up to 50-80% for the "larger" flies and bugs.
I've tried in the past with a tripod, but as you say, they're gone long before I can get setup and usually end up knocking everything about getting the legs right.
Interestingly I found a use for the Liveview preview of the K20D and it was interesting using the technique above while watching the LCD. The main problem with it, though, was the appreciable delay between hitting the shutter release and it actually happening. It seems like the camera has to lower the mirror again (from liveview), raise it again (take the picture), then lower it again (finish). I'd understand why if I didn't have everything in Manual. The time it takes is too long to hold the camera steady.
It would work great on a tripod with a remote release, but then I'm back to lugging that lot around
Posted 04/05/2008 - 20:49
Link
Quote:
I think that this is Scolopostethus affinis...
Looks right, according to this site: http://www.britishbugs.org.uk/heteroptera/Lygaeidae/scolopostethus_affinis.html I think that this is Scolopostethus affinis...
Quote:
My technique is a bit rusty. The LumiQuest Softbox (many thanks to Dan for previously posting about this!) gives much better lighting for me - softer, less harsh and less glare.
You're welcome. With my flash, it reduces the exposure to f/11 or f/9.5 at ISO200, so it's easier to balance the flash with daylight too, which can help reduce the number of black backgrounds.My technique is a bit rusty. The LumiQuest Softbox (many thanks to Dan for previously posting about this!) gives much better lighting for me - softer, less harsh and less glare.
Nice shot though, very tricky getting those tiny bugs right.
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 04/05/2008 - 22:24
Link
Quote:
Looks right, according to this site: http://www.britishbugs.org.uk/heteroptera/Lygaeidae/scolopostethus_affinis.html
They have a few of my macro photos of bugs on that very useful site
Looks right, according to this site: http://www.britishbugs.org.uk/heteroptera/Lygaeidae/scolopostethus_affinis.html
Posted 04/05/2008 - 22:29
Link
So they do! Neil Phillips, another contributer, is a friend of mine, didn't know some of his were on there either.
Dan
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


589 posts
19 years
Berkshire
I think that this is Scolopostethus affinis, a tiny 4mm bug:
http://flickr.com/photos/chirpy_uk/2463348835/
F/16, 1/90, ISO200 with Dynamic Range Enhancement enabled.
My technique is a bit rusty. The LumiQuest Softbox (many thanks to Dan for previously posting about this!) gives much better lighting for me - softer, less harsh and less glare.
I'm not sure about the D-Range setting. It helps prevent blown highlights, but adds significant noise in shadows which can be a pain. I'll probably switch it off in future.
Macro & Wildlife Photography