Fashion Lingerie Shoot
Posted 09/07/2009 - 21:52
Link
Only asking Why have you not used Portrait Mode? seems a bit tight on the top & bottom and a lot of space to the left.
Tel,
Posted 09/07/2009 - 21:54
Link
We wanted the depth of the forest adds to the atmosphere
Posted 10/07/2009 - 15:53
Link
kemp wrote:
We wanted the depth of the forest adds to the atmosphere
OK.
We wanted the depth of the forest adds to the atmosphere
Tel,
Posted 10/07/2009 - 16:22
Link
I prefer the last one, just because I think the pose works better. I personally think the lighting is spot on, and the depth of the forest does add to the atmospere. Good effort - very good effort in fact.
I've been trying to get some good portrait shots under my belt, and still have'nt really managed it. Wish I was churning out work like this
I've been trying to get some good portrait shots under my belt, and still have'nt really managed it. Wish I was churning out work like this
Posted 10/07/2009 - 18:47
Link
I spend loads of time in the woods but never see anything like this.
Dan
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 10/07/2009 - 19:39
Link
I like your lighting but it might have been worthwhile hiring a professional model. Somebody would have done it on a 'time for pictures' basis to get pics this good.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 10/07/2009 - 20:29
Link
Interesting you say you like the lighting - I don't (to be blunt) can you expand on why it's good lighting as this is something I don't really understand. To me on my screen (and that may be the issue) she's popping out rather - is this desirable in this context?
Mike
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 10/07/2009 - 20:39
Link
If the main aim is to show off the lingerie, it doesn't do it. I like the shots, but for me, it doesn't accomplish the goal. Some of the shots show almost no detail because you have subtle lighting, dark clothing, and dark background.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 10/07/2009 - 21:24
Link
Daniel Bridge wrote:
I spend loads of time in the woods but never see anything like this.
Dan
Obviously in the wrong woods
I spend loads of time in the woods but never see anything like this.
Dan
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 10/07/2009 - 21:56
Link
I like these shots, the atmosphere that is created and the subtle lighting. The model (your fiancee I presume) looks almost nymph or fairy-like - I hope that's the kind of atmosphere you were going for!
I still would have composed the shots in portrait, I think you would have achieved the same feel. You could then have got a little closer to the subject maybe, and shown off the lingerie more - which I would imagine is priority with these shots.
But I still like them!
I still would have composed the shots in portrait, I think you would have achieved the same feel. You could then have got a little closer to the subject maybe, and shown off the lingerie more - which I would imagine is priority with these shots.
But I still like them!
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep". ~Scott Adams
Q | Various Q lenses & filters | KP | 35mm 2.8 Macro
Q | Various Q lenses & filters | KP | 35mm 2.8 Macro
Posted 11/07/2009 - 02:37
Link
Personally I think the poses are awful...that's me being totally blunt there! I'm trying to single one out to use as an example but they are all weird. Weird as in the model looks very awkward, the poor girl doesn't look comfortable in any of the shots. I would say that the 2nd one is the worst for me as she looks like she is being pulled back into the tree, really not sure what you were trying to achieve there! If I had to say which was the best pose then I would have to say number 5, but it's to full on, she should be slightly turned.
The shots aren't showing Fashion or Lingerie as the model is far to far away.
I agree with what others are saying that they should have been shot as portraits. In fashion, people aren't worried about the foliage, the main thing is the clothing and the model.
Paul
Edit: Spelling
The shots aren't showing Fashion or Lingerie as the model is far to far away.
I agree with what others are saying that they should have been shot as portraits. In fashion, people aren't worried about the foliage, the main thing is the clothing and the model.
Paul
Edit: Spelling
Posted 11/07/2009 - 10:07
Link
Definitely surreal.
G
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


93 posts
17 years
UK