FA* lenses.
Posted 14/01/2010 - 10:13
Link
womble wrote:
I'll admit to being very tempted by the WR 100mm macro.
K.
No aperture-ring Kris, so if that one works then the DA*200 works as well since it's the same as the FA*200 and the DA*300 does also work well according to some test on pentaxofrums.com.I'll admit to being very tempted by the WR 100mm macro.
K.
I believe all DA* lenses do pretty well on film except the DA*16-50... I have looked for the topic but can't find it.
You can always go for Sigma or Tamron of course.
Posted 14/01/2010 - 18:48
Link
Anvh wrote:
We don't need, but we want!! I have a few lovely FA lenses which I would love to use on a FF DSLR..
imagesteve wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong but a FA* modified for APS sensors will be a DA* anyway..
Yes precisely, we don't need FF right?Correct me if i'm wrong but a FA* modified for APS sensors will be a DA* anyway..
2x K10D bodies, 2x FA 28-200 3.8-5.6, DA 18-55, A 50 F2, 50mm Macro, 360 FGZ. Still saving for the 60-250 DA* Also have a Z10 35mm and a K1000 just for fun. IF PENTAX IS THE ANSWER, WHO CARES WHAT THE QUESTION IS...!
Quote:
Posted 14/01/2010 - 19:33
Link
imagesteve wrote:
We don't need, but we want!! I have a few lovely FA lenses which I would love to use on a FF DSLR..
Have you bought yourself a Canon, you could use them on that a K-mount adapter.
We don't need, but we want!! I have a few lovely FA lenses which I would love to use on a FF DSLR..
Posted 15/01/2010 - 19:28
Link
Canon? wash your mouth out with soap and water Anvh! We will have no swearing here..........
Now about FF. That is another thing that we want and soon.
Mind you I do have a FF Pentax, its called a film SLR.
So, those FA* would still work wonderfully on my MZ-5n, not that I use it that much these days.
Now about FF. That is another thing that we want and soon.
Mind you I do have a FF Pentax, its called a film SLR.
So, those FA* would still work wonderfully on my MZ-5n, not that I use it that much these days.
Some Cameras
Posted 15/01/2010 - 20:30
Link
Sorry to offend you Offertonhatter, I just hate to censor it like this C****n, it's just like they are afraid of the word and are calling it the dark side.
Sorry that I make a point out of this, although it's just in good fun of course, but I find it more childish & pathetic then fun to be honest to talk about another brand like that.
Aren't we proud enough about Pentax that we need to protect us like this?
Now back to the topic.
We is a big word you know, I'm not for FF and some others here neither.
I can see the merits of FF but the difference is quite small and the APS-C has matured quite well.
Can you tell me about why you want FF besides noise & dynamic range?
Most of us are already quite impressed with the KX but Sony has already a newer generation of that sensor (exmor R) and I think we can see that pretty soon in APS-C sized cameras and then the difference might be very small with the current FF DSLR.
Also the new type of sensor is getting developed link.
I think the APS-C will win from FF just because they are smaller and are more then good enough for most of us.
ps. sorry of going off topic again
Sorry that I make a point out of this, although it's just in good fun of course, but I find it more childish & pathetic then fun to be honest to talk about another brand like that.
Aren't we proud enough about Pentax that we need to protect us like this?
Now back to the topic.
We is a big word you know, I'm not for FF and some others here neither.
I can see the merits of FF but the difference is quite small and the APS-C has matured quite well.
Can you tell me about why you want FF besides noise & dynamic range?
Most of us are already quite impressed with the KX but Sony has already a newer generation of that sensor (exmor R) and I think we can see that pretty soon in APS-C sized cameras and then the difference might be very small with the current FF DSLR.
Also the new type of sensor is getting developed link.
I think the APS-C will win from FF just because they are smaller and are more then good enough for most of us.
ps. sorry of going off topic again
Posted 15/01/2010 - 20:49
Link
Anvh wrote:
Sorry to offend you Offertonhatter, I just hate to censor it like this C****n, it's just like they are afraid of the word and are calling it the dark side.
Sorry that I make a point out of this, although it's just in good fun of course, but I find it more childish & pathetic then fun to be honest to talk about another brand like that.
Aren't we proud enough about Pentax that we need to protect us like this?
Now back to the topic.
We is a big word you know, I'm not for FF and some others here neither.
I can see the merits of FF but the difference is quite small and the APS-C has matured quite well.
Can you tell me about why you want FF besides noise & dynamic range?
Most of us are already quite impressed with the KX but Sony has already a newer generation of that sensor (exmor R) and I think we can see that pretty soon in APS-C sized cameras and then the difference might be very small with the current FF DSLR.
Also the new type of sensor is getting developed link.
I think the APS-C will win from FF just because they are smaller and are more then good enough for most of us.
ps. sorry of going off topic again
Just a few comments on some comments..Sorry to offend you Offertonhatter, I just hate to censor it like this C****n, it's just like they are afraid of the word and are calling it the dark side.
Sorry that I make a point out of this, although it's just in good fun of course, but I find it more childish & pathetic then fun to be honest to talk about another brand like that.
Aren't we proud enough about Pentax that we need to protect us like this?
Now back to the topic.
We is a big word you know, I'm not for FF and some others here neither.
I can see the merits of FF but the difference is quite small and the APS-C has matured quite well.
Can you tell me about why you want FF besides noise & dynamic range?
Most of us are already quite impressed with the KX but Sony has already a newer generation of that sensor (exmor R) and I think we can see that pretty soon in APS-C sized cameras and then the difference might be very small with the current FF DSLR.
Also the new type of sensor is getting developed link.
I think the APS-C will win from FF just because they are smaller and are more then good enough for most of us.
ps. sorry of going off topic again
If there are those that don't want FF, would they also be those that don't want medium format?
As for new sensor being developed, with Pentax's time scale it should have been used by Sony, Canon or Nikon for a year or so before Pentax say "hey, this looks good, shall we use it"?
For those here with the 31mm lens, a Pentax FF digital is the body it should be attached to.
FA lenses will also realise the benefit of FF.
Cropped sensors and native lenses were the best way to re-invent the camera and boost sales.
Large sensors rule and always will.
Regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 15/01/2010 - 21:19
Link
I'm one of the weird ones I don't see the purpose in FF sensor at the moment but would love a MF camera and that's just because of the nature of those camera's.
it's hard to do that with the K20D
About the lenses that's a personal thing although the depth of field I think is a valid point but you didn't named that
K10D wrote:
As for new sensor being developed, with Pentax's time scale it should have been used by Sony, Canon or Nikon for a year or so before Pentax say "hey, this looks good, shall we use it"?
Some examples?As for new sensor being developed, with Pentax's time scale it should have been used by Sony, Canon or Nikon for a year or so before Pentax say "hey, this looks good, shall we use it"?
it's hard to do that with the K20D
About the lenses that's a personal thing although the depth of field I think is a valid point but you didn't named that
K10D wrote:
Cropped sensors and native lenses were the best way to re-invent the camera and boost sales.
Why.., I don't see what you mean?Cropped sensors and native lenses were the best way to re-invent the camera and boost sales.
K10D wrote:
Large sensors rule and always will.
They rule in what?
Large sensors rule and always will.
Posted 15/01/2010 - 22:02
Link
Anvh wrote:
Sorry that I make a point out of this, although it's just in good fun of course, but I find it more childish & pathetic then fun to be honest to talk about another brand like that.
Aren't we proud enough about Pentax that we need to protect us like this?
Sorry Anvh, maybe it is my british sense of humour. I have a number of friends who have various different makes of camera's and we always have a dig at each other. It's not quite childish, but always happen. I reality we have a great respect for how we use the camera, but we can't help having a dig at each other, hence the thread.Sorry that I make a point out of this, although it's just in good fun of course, but I find it more childish & pathetic then fun to be honest to talk about another brand like that.
Aren't we proud enough about Pentax that we need to protect us like this?
Of course I am a proud Pentaxian and would'nt have it any other way, but we just have fun having a dig.
Some Cameras
Posted 15/01/2010 - 22:10
Link
Don't worry Offertonhatter, it wasn't directed to you it happens on different sites as well and I take no personal offence and I hope you won't neither.
I also make a sharp remark to other brand owners and they can take it but it comes back as well, indeed that;s fun but there is no one to defend that brand here so
I also make a sharp remark to other brand owners and they can take it but it comes back as well, indeed that;s fun but there is no one to defend that brand here so
Posted 15/01/2010 - 23:26
Link
Anvh wrote:
Don't worry Offertonhatter, it wasn't directed to you it happens on different sites as well and I take no personal offence and I hope you won't neither.
I also make a sharp remark to other brand owners and they can take it but it comes back as well, indeed that;s fun but there is no one to defend that brand here so
No problem at all, half the fun is having a dig with friends, its when it gets abusive when it is a problem, and there are a number of other forums....indeed camera clubs, where stupid rivalry appears. Obviously here we are proud pentaxians, who have fun and enjoy life, and long may it continue.
Don't worry Offertonhatter, it wasn't directed to you it happens on different sites as well and I take no personal offence and I hope you won't neither.
I also make a sharp remark to other brand owners and they can take it but it comes back as well, indeed that;s fun but there is no one to defend that brand here so
Some Cameras
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1697 posts
20 years
Richmond / Denbigh
I only really started to earn serious money after they were discontinued
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.