Expanded dynamic range - disadvantages?

misiek_knm
Posted 25/02/2009 - 22:22 Link
Anyone knows what are the disadvantages of using expanded dynamic range in K20D (apart from the obvious reduced ISO range)?
First I read the manual I thought that it was a good idea to switch the feature on, so I'd loose less details in shadows, but now I wonder if I was right.
Kind regards,
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
pentaxian450
Posted 26/02/2009 - 00:18 Link
The main disadvantage (and maybe the only one) is a slight increase in noise level and the loss of ISO 100.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
iceblinker
Posted 26/02/2009 - 03:50 Link
I think it's a pseudo increase in dynamic range rather than a real one. It effectively slightly expands the range into the highlights side of the spectrum rather than the shadows. There is an increase in noise - most noticeable in the shadows.

You can get a similar effect with RAW by under-exposing and pushing in post-processing.
~Pete
misiek_knm
Posted 27/02/2009 - 00:37 Link
Thanks - and I wondered why I have noise in shadows @ISO 200. Next time I'll switch it off and look at the difference then.
Kind regards,
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo