Exif/Properties
Posted 20/04/2011 - 15:17
Link
I pulled it down to my desktop ( to try an image tweak in DarkTable ) and on my desktop (Ubuntu) it shows correctly as Aperature Priority.
So I guess it's a bug on this site's gallery software ...
So I guess it's a bug on this site's gallery software ...
Posted 20/04/2011 - 15:42
Link
Quote:
So I guess it's a bug on this site's gallery software ...
So who do I report it to -JR? or is there an IT man somewhere?So I guess it's a bug on this site's gallery software ...
regards
Bernard
Posted 20/04/2011 - 15:49
Link
It's a hard-to-find button at very, very bottom of page, 3rd entry in from left. I only know because JR directed me to it earlier this week.
Posted 20/04/2011 - 15:53
Link
OK I'll invoke that and see what happens
Bernard
OK reported
Bernard
OK reported
Posted 20/04/2011 - 16:39
Link
I believe it's a long standing problem with some of the forum software. It's been reported previously but apparently the problem is not easy to resolve
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 20/04/2011 - 16:59
Link
It's already been reported a few times over recent months but it's a tough one to fix - it's on the list.
Best regards, John
Posted 21/04/2011 - 09:59
Link
Is the software here still GPL2, or is it proprietary/non-distributable now due to customization?
Posted 21/04/2011 - 10:15
Link
I just looked at the posted image and for me it shows as Aperture Priority. I used right click and then 'view image exif data' in Firefox.
What method of viewing the exif data is giving Shutter Priority ?
What method of viewing the exif data is giving Shutter Priority ?
Posted 21/04/2011 - 10:37
Link
Clicking on the pic in my gallery brings up the description and the Exif can be assessed. That's were the problem lies apparently.
Don't bother looking I've now deleted the file as it was only put in the gallery to enable me to transfer (I now know I can't do that) into a post.
I'll leave the software boys to do their thing
regards
Bernard
Don't bother looking I've now deleted the file as it was only put in the gallery to enable me to transfer (I now know I can't do that) into a post.
I'll leave the software boys to do their thing
regards
Bernard
Posted 21/04/2011 - 10:37
Link
The Gallery shows Aperture Priority as Shutter Priority.
Best regards, John
Posted 21/04/2011 - 10:45
Link
Not exactly ...
When I posted the issue to this thread Frogherder had not yet figured out how to add an image in the thread, so I was looking at his Gallery.
Frogherder seems to have deleted that image now. But if you look at his 1 image here you'll see an EXIF 'Click Here' link. Click and you'll see that it lists Exposure Program as Shutter priority. Odd seeing that that image does not have any EXIF data, as verified both by FF plugin and downloading and checking in Ubuntu/GNOME.
So simply setting the default value to Undefined would at least stop it showing incorrect data.
When I posted the issue to this thread Frogherder had not yet figured out how to add an image in the thread, so I was looking at his Gallery.
Frogherder seems to have deleted that image now. But if you look at his 1 image here you'll see an EXIF 'Click Here' link. Click and you'll see that it lists Exposure Program as Shutter priority. Odd seeing that that image does not have any EXIF data, as verified both by FF plugin and downloading and checking in Ubuntu/GNOME.
So simply setting the default value to Undefined would at least stop it showing incorrect data.
Posted 21/04/2011 - 11:13
Link
To clarify things a little here is a screen shot of the properties of the image as stored on my PC :-

As JR have confirmed and email discussion with the software team there is a gremlin in the works and whilst Layingback gets the same as I do that may be because he's using Linux.
The pic posted was cropped in Photoshop7 which may make some difference- I don't know.
The only oddity as far as I knew was that the focal length listed is what I set the anti-shake to and not the actual figure for the Manual lens.
regards
Bernard

As JR have confirmed and email discussion with the software team there is a gremlin in the works and whilst Layingback gets the same as I do that may be because he's using Linux.
The pic posted was cropped in Photoshop7 which may make some difference- I don't know.
The only oddity as far as I knew was that the focal length listed is what I set the anti-shake to and not the actual figure for the Manual lens.
regards
Bernard
Posted 21/04/2011 - 11:40
Link
Frogherder wrote:
The only oddity as far as I knew was that the focal length listed is what I set the anti-shake to and not the actual figure for the Manual lens.
That's the way it works for manual lenses. Indeed that's all the camera has to go on - which is why it has to ask you in the first place, if you see what I mean.
The only oddity as far as I knew was that the focal length listed is what I set the anti-shake to and not the actual figure for the Manual lens.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1776 posts
17 years
Burton upon Trent
Checking the original file on my PC the Properties listed "Aperture Priority"
I'm confused as to why there should be this discrepancy
The photograph was taken with the green mode setting.
The Lens a Tamron SP 500mm manual focus mirror lens
Antishake set to 800 and the camera mounted on a tripod (I forgot that both are mutually exclusive)
regards
Bernard