DxO figures for Pentax
Posted 14/12/2009 - 12:36
Link
I saw this the other day, and found it very disappointing and a bid sad...
Posted 14/12/2009 - 12:48
Link
Funny to see that everyone is making there own figures, Dpreview had some other results for example... it's hard to believe which one is true... maybe there are even difference in the test might influence things.
I'm not saying it isn't true since, they are, just saying that real world experiences might be different then lab tests
I've heard though that some K7 user find it more noisy then the K20D. I believe we did some test which noise was easier to clean up, wasn't it that of the K7?
Some feedback on that might be useful
I'm not saying it isn't true since, they are, just saying that real world experiences might be different then lab tests
I've heard though that some K7 user find it more noisy then the K20D. I believe we did some test which noise was easier to clean up, wasn't it that of the K7?
Some feedback on that might be useful
Posted 14/12/2009 - 15:25
Link
The numbers are just that, numbers. Look at an image and see if you can name the camera that created it?
Regards
Regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 14/12/2009 - 16:37
Link
Check Falconeye comments at this link: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/83000-dxomark-releases-ben...
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 14/12/2009 - 21:46
Link
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?
G
Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:05
Link
Quote:
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
I don't know, but it would be nice.
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
Best regards, John
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:24
Link
Well all I can say is my photos look better in Windows 7 than they do in Vista, so you can look at as many figures as you like but for me it's your eyes that count at the end of the day, so to speak
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:27
Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?
G
Good God Sir!Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?
G
Next you will suggest evaluating Hifi by listening to it rather than looking at the pretty lights on the front.
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:33
Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?
G
You have screen and print.Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?
G
With Screen it's 1:1 pixel magnification and print is 300dpi 8"x12" print comes down to 8mp at full print size.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.




6416 posts
17 years
link
Regards