DxO figures for Pentax

K10D
Posted 14/12/2009 - 07:02 Link
Some data for Pentax

link

Regards
Too far from a shore.
nathanever82
Posted 14/12/2009 - 12:36 Link
I saw this the other day, and found it very disappointing and a bid sad...
'Between the lights there is always a shadow'

www.nathanservi.com & PPG
Anvh
Posted 14/12/2009 - 12:48 Link
Funny to see that everyone is making there own figures, Dpreview had some other results for example... it's hard to believe which one is true... maybe there are even difference in the test might influence things.
I'm not saying it isn't true since, they are, just saying that real world experiences might be different then lab tests

I've heard though that some K7 user find it more noisy then the K20D. I believe we did some test which noise was easier to clean up, wasn't it that of the K7?
Some feedback on that might be useful
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D
Posted 14/12/2009 - 15:25 Link
The numbers are just that, numbers. Look at an image and see if you can name the camera that created it?

Regards
Too far from a shore.
pentaxian450
Posted 14/12/2009 - 16:37 Link
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
George Lazarette
Posted 14/12/2009 - 21:46 Link
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?

Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Mike-P
Posted 14/12/2009 - 21:53 Link
On the basis of that I am selling my K10D.
Purchase price to any forum member: £920.
1 time offer only, valid for 24 hours.


According to them its better than the K-7 in every respect bar High ISO and theres not THAT much in it.
johnriley
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:05 Link
Quote:
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?
I don't know, but it would be nice.
Best regards, John
jackitec
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:24 Link
Well all I can say is my photos look better in Windows 7 than they do in Vista, so you can look at as many figures as you like but for me it's your eyes that count at the end of the day, so to speak
Oggy
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:27 Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?

Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?

G
Good God Sir!

Next you will suggest evaluating Hifi by listening to it rather than looking at the pretty lights on the front.
Comment Image
Anvh
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:33 Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Has anybody considered evaluating cameras based on how the pictures look to the human eye?

Or is that not considered relevant to the pixel-peeping fraternity?

G
You have screen and print.
With Screen it's 1:1 pixel magnification and print is 300dpi 8"x12" print comes down to 8mp at full print size.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Greytop
Posted 14/12/2009 - 22:56 Link
The proof of the pudding is in the eating not admiring the recipe
Regards Huw

flickr

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo