Dust
Posted 12/12/2008 - 18:49
Link
beginner wrote:
I dont like the thought of fliuds on a sensor!..and the cost of sending it to Pentax would be what for cleaning.....£40?....plus return postage and insurance!.....it makes the cost of the basic arctic butterfly a very cheap option, also it can be used time and time again with no chance of smears or smudges,I say again it's the only tool for me...........Ken
Arctic Butterfly is no good for stuck-on particles, then either a liquid or a more aggressive dry cleaning method is needed.
I dont like the thought of fliuds on a sensor!..and the cost of sending it to Pentax would be what for cleaning.....£40?....plus return postage and insurance!.....it makes the cost of the basic arctic butterfly a very cheap option, also it can be used time and time again with no chance of smears or smudges,I say again it's the only tool for me...........Ken
~Pete
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
3062 posts
19 years
England Inside leg: 34
It's quite alarming to look at filters that you think are clean with one. It was enough to make me give up using UV filters as protection.
I doubt the reputable Lens Pen company (maker of the SensorKlear pen) would recommend breathing on the sensor if it did any harm.