Digital Camera Utilty 4 Tutorial
Posted 12/10/2012 - 21:34 - Helpful Comment
Link
Hi Peter, I have been somewhat of a lone ranger around here recently in defending the virtues of PCU4, so I would be delighted to discuss it and offer the experience I have gained - we'll need to keep a careful lookout though for the charge of the Lightroom brigade, as they may ambush us at any moment
I don't think I'm up for offering a full blown tutorial, but I'll tell you a bit about the software and how it can be best used in a workflow.
Lets be clear - Lightroom is obviously a great 'all-in-one' solution for many photographers, and also obviously it can output high quality images. But it is essentially a 'one-stop-shop' approach, containing an image management module, a RAW converter and image editor in one.
PCU4 really only provides the RAW converter part of that, at least in a fully fledged way - there are limited photo management and 'editing' features, but most of us will choose to use other software for these aspects. However, it does provide a very high quality RAW conversion from Pentax PEF & DNG files, so it is a great choice, and free as well
There are two key things to appreciate about PCU4 : firstly, it uses the processing 'engines' and algorithams of the Japanese product 'Silkypix Developer Studio', a professional grade RAW conversion program. PCU4 does not have the same complex graphical interfaces for its controls (using mostly simple sliders), but its output quality is potentially the same.
Secondly, PCU4 contains duplicate controls for a number of Pentax specific camera settings, such as lens corrections and 'Custom Image settings' such as Landscape / Natural / Portrait / saturation / sharpness / high & low contrast etc etc. This means that you have access to these specific Pentax image adjustments in the software, so when shooting RAW you don't need to bother with setting them up on the camera before shooting
If you do have any of these settings applied on the camera, they will be there by default already set in PCU4 when the shot is opened, saving considerable time if shooting a whole batch of the same type.
These Pentax specific camera settings are tailored to the dynamic range and capabilities of the camera, so do provide high quality adjustments to the pictures, so well worth using in my opinion - in PCU4 you can tweak them to your hearts content until its perfect without making any permanent changes to the original RAW file, and of course even after 'saving as' and producing a TIFF or JPEG output you can always just go back and reopen the original RAW and 'Re-Develop' it again in a different way!
I love the quality of the pictures I'm now producing using PCU4, I believe it gets the best out of my Pentax K7. I'm out of time tonight, but if this has been interesting, let me know and I'll write a bit more soon about a kind of step by step approach to working on a shot in PCU4.
I don't think I'm up for offering a full blown tutorial, but I'll tell you a bit about the software and how it can be best used in a workflow.
Lets be clear - Lightroom is obviously a great 'all-in-one' solution for many photographers, and also obviously it can output high quality images. But it is essentially a 'one-stop-shop' approach, containing an image management module, a RAW converter and image editor in one.
PCU4 really only provides the RAW converter part of that, at least in a fully fledged way - there are limited photo management and 'editing' features, but most of us will choose to use other software for these aspects. However, it does provide a very high quality RAW conversion from Pentax PEF & DNG files, so it is a great choice, and free as well
There are two key things to appreciate about PCU4 : firstly, it uses the processing 'engines' and algorithams of the Japanese product 'Silkypix Developer Studio', a professional grade RAW conversion program. PCU4 does not have the same complex graphical interfaces for its controls (using mostly simple sliders), but its output quality is potentially the same.
Secondly, PCU4 contains duplicate controls for a number of Pentax specific camera settings, such as lens corrections and 'Custom Image settings' such as Landscape / Natural / Portrait / saturation / sharpness / high & low contrast etc etc. This means that you have access to these specific Pentax image adjustments in the software, so when shooting RAW you don't need to bother with setting them up on the camera before shooting
If you do have any of these settings applied on the camera, they will be there by default already set in PCU4 when the shot is opened, saving considerable time if shooting a whole batch of the same type.
These Pentax specific camera settings are tailored to the dynamic range and capabilities of the camera, so do provide high quality adjustments to the pictures, so well worth using in my opinion - in PCU4 you can tweak them to your hearts content until its perfect without making any permanent changes to the original RAW file, and of course even after 'saving as' and producing a TIFF or JPEG output you can always just go back and reopen the original RAW and 'Re-Develop' it again in a different way!
I love the quality of the pictures I'm now producing using PCU4, I believe it gets the best out of my Pentax K7. I'm out of time tonight, but if this has been interesting, let me know and I'll write a bit more soon about a kind of step by step approach to working on a shot in PCU4.
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Posted 12/10/2012 - 23:44
Link
Many thanks, Nigel.
I'll get back to you later when you have a bit more time and I've sorted out some specific questions.
Basically I'm looking to use PDCU4 as the initial step in processing my RAW (DNG) files from my K-r. Once I've gone as far as I can using that program I have Serif PhotoPlus X4 (and others) to do anything more.
Till then, thanks again
Peter
I'll get back to you later when you have a bit more time and I've sorted out some specific questions.
Basically I'm looking to use PDCU4 as the initial step in processing my RAW (DNG) files from my K-r. Once I've gone as far as I can using that program I have Serif PhotoPlus X4 (and others) to do anything more.
Till then, thanks again
Peter
Posted 13/10/2012 - 16:02
Link
Yep, thats the best way to think of it - the initial 'development' of the photo (thats the term Silkypix use themselves). Whilst the range of adjustments you can make is wide, the key difference between PCU4 and other 'editor' type software is that in PCU4 you work on the whole image at once - you don't pick out little bits for isolated work (selections). You can balance on a global basis, for example, lower the brightest tones (which might be a sky and clouds) or brighten darker shadows across the image, but you couldn't just brighten one rock or darken one cloud.
Watch this space, and over the next few days I'll give a outline of a workflow and look at how to set up the layout of the program in order to get access to all the key adjustment controls.
Watch this space, and over the next few days I'll give a outline of a workflow and look at how to set up the layout of the program in order to get access to all the key adjustment controls.
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Posted 13/10/2012 - 16:48
Link
I have used the Pentax Digital Camera Utility 4 over an extended period of time to do initial development of RAW images. Whilst it is very good for the lens corrections (chromatic aberrations, distortion etc.), I find that opening the RAW files in Photoshop Camera RAW, carrying out the initial RAW adjustments, then opening directly into Photoshop produces superior results.
I know that a lot of people don't have Photoshop, but if you do my recommendation would be to use this instead of PDCU4.
Regards
David
I know that a lot of people don't have Photoshop, but if you do my recommendation would be to use this instead of PDCU4.
Regards
David
Posted 13/10/2012 - 17:30
Link
davidstorm wrote:
I find that opening the RAW files in Photoshop Camera RAW, carrying out the initial RAW adjustments, then opening directly into Photoshop produces superior results.
The Adobe Camera Raw plugin does not have anything like the range of fine adjustment options that are available in PCU4 - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections, not to mention all the Custom Image parameters. And there is nothing in ACR for Saturation that comes anywhere near the 'Fine Colour' colour wheel controls in PCU4. I believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4. I find that opening the RAW files in Photoshop Camera RAW, carrying out the initial RAW adjustments, then opening directly into Photoshop produces superior results.
But, lets face it - really objective quality comparisons are difficult. My suggestion is that we keep this thread just for tip and tricks and workflow tutorials for PCU4, which is what the OP was looking for.
I raised a challenge in another thread, a 'Photo Processing Shootout' (although that was between Lightroom and PCU4 plus others as needed). No - one took it up! How about it David? - a shootoout between ACR + photoshop (you) and PCU4 + Sagelight + PS Elements (me). We choose a good RAW original (one of your gorgeous Lakes views would be perfect), send me a copy, and we post the results for a vote!
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Posted 13/10/2012 - 20:39
Link
Just do it all in ONE program. Lightroom 4.
Posted 13/10/2012 - 22:18
Link
McGregNi wrote:
How about it David? - a shootoout between ACR + photoshop (you) and PCU4 + Sagelight + PS Elements (me). We choose a good RAW original (one of your gorgeous Lakes views would be perfect), send me a copy, and we post the results for a vote!
What the hell! I'm up for a challenge Nigel, PM me your e-mail address and I'll send you what I consider to be a 'difficult' image to process and we'll see what happens!!How about it David? - a shootoout between ACR + photoshop (you) and PCU4 + Sagelight + PS Elements (me). We choose a good RAW original (one of your gorgeous Lakes views would be perfect), send me a copy, and we post the results for a vote!
Best wishes
David
Posted 14/10/2012 - 08:07
Link
OK David - I know I might live to regret this! But it should be fun at least. Smeggy in the other thread predicted a 1% difference in quality between the two - who knows? Lets start a new thread when the images are ready - maybe others might like to try as well.
For now I suggest to all again that we keep this thread for the OP's request, which was for info on working with PCU4.
May the best man win
For now I suggest to all again that we keep this thread for the OP's request, which was for info on working with PCU4.
May the best man win
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Posted 23/10/2012 - 19:52
Link
Since posting this thread I've now thrown caution to the wind and had a 'play' with PDCU4 !
I just tried clicking different buttons to see what they did - some gave hints as I hovered but others didn't.
The result was a fairly disjointed affair but apeared to give something approaching what I was looking for so I saved it as a jpeg which I then enhanced a bit in a different bit of software that came free with a *an** camera ! I've posted the final result on the gallery.
Meanwhile, I have now done what Pentax should have done in the first place - created a pdf 'User Manual' by 'printing' all the sections of the html 'Help' file to pdf files and then combining them all into a single file. It runs to 111 pages and 9MB but at least it is easier to study than hopping around the on-screen html file.
Give me a few months and I'll be back !!!
Peter
I just tried clicking different buttons to see what they did - some gave hints as I hovered but others didn't.
The result was a fairly disjointed affair but apeared to give something approaching what I was looking for so I saved it as a jpeg which I then enhanced a bit in a different bit of software that came free with a *an** camera ! I've posted the final result on the gallery.
Meanwhile, I have now done what Pentax should have done in the first place - created a pdf 'User Manual' by 'printing' all the sections of the html 'Help' file to pdf files and then combining them all into a single file. It runs to 111 pages and 9MB but at least it is easier to study than hopping around the on-screen html file.
Give me a few months and I'll be back !!!
Peter
Posted 23/10/2012 - 23:53
Link
McGregNi wrote:
The Adobe Camera Raw plugin does not have anything like the range of fine adjustment options that are available in PCU4 - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections,
Can you list the range of adjustment options - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections, that Camera Raw is so lacking in compared to PCU4The Adobe Camera Raw plugin does not have anything like the range of fine adjustment options that are available in PCU4 - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections,
Quote:
not to mention all the Custom Image parameters. And there is nothing in ACR for Saturation that comes anywhere near the 'Fine Colour' colour wheel controls in PCU4. I believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4.
Again can you list these differences.
not to mention all the Custom Image parameters. And there is nothing in ACR for Saturation that comes anywhere near the 'Fine Colour' colour wheel controls in PCU4. I believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 24/10/2012 - 00:06
Link
McGregNi wrote:
Yep, thats the best way to think of it - the initial 'development' of the photo (thats the term Silkypix use themselves). Whilst the range of adjustments you can make is wide, the key difference between PCU4 and other 'editor' type software is that in PCU4 you work on the whole image at once - you don't pick out little bits for isolated work (selections). You can balance on a global basis, for example, lower the brightest tones (which might be a sky and clouds) or brighten darker shadows across the image, but you couldn't just brighten one rock or darken one cloud.
The above is interesting and Yep, thats the best way to think of it - the initial 'development' of the photo (thats the term Silkypix use themselves). Whilst the range of adjustments you can make is wide, the key difference between PCU4 and other 'editor' type software is that in PCU4 you work on the whole image at once - you don't pick out little bits for isolated work (selections). You can balance on a global basis, for example, lower the brightest tones (which might be a sky and clouds) or brighten darker shadows across the image, but you couldn't just brighten one rock or darken one cloud.
Quote:
I believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4.
ACR has adjustment brushes and Grad filters that allow you to applyI believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4.
Temp]
Tint
Exposure
Contrast
Highlights
Shadows
Clarity
saturation
Sharpness
Noise Reduction
Moire Reduction
on local areas of the image.
PDCU4 has none of this, but according to you "The Adobe Camera Raw plugin does not have anything like the range of fine adjustment options that are available in PCU4 - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections, "
Looking forward to your list of parameters
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 24/10/2012 - 11:17
Link
Smeggypants wrote:
I can't quote the differences as I don't have Lightroom etc so can only list what PDCU4 'Help' says are available :-McGregNi wrote:
The Adobe Camera Raw plugin does not have anything like the range of fine adjustment options that are available in PCU4 - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections,
Can you list the range of adjustment options - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections, that Camera Raw is so lacking in compared to PCU4The Adobe Camera Raw plugin does not have anything like the range of fine adjustment options that are available in PCU4 - especially in the Shadows and highlights corrections,
Quote:
not to mention all the Custom Image parameters. And there is nothing in ACR for Saturation that comes anywhere near the 'Fine Colour' colour wheel controls in PCU4. I believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4.
Again can you list these differences.not to mention all the Custom Image parameters. And there is nothing in ACR for Saturation that comes anywhere near the 'Fine Colour' colour wheel controls in PCU4. I believe we can definately produce a more 'finished' output from PCU4.
Folders
Favorite
Image Processing Queue List
Preview
Histogram
Cropping
Checked Image View
Image Data
Custom Image
White Balance
Exposure/ Tone
Rotate/ Shift
Noise Reduction
Lens aberration correction
Map
Highlight Adjustment
Color Fine Tune
Each of these has a wide range of adjustments which, as a beginner to RAW processing, I find extremely confusing.
That is why I posted the original question "Does anyone know of a good Tutorial ?"
I'm sure Nigel will be able to expand better on the above list but for now I'm just 'prodding around' to see what happens !!!
Peter
Posted 24/10/2012 - 12:02
Link
Just had another 'play' with PDCU4 and posted the result on the Gallery.
My wife (ex schoolteacher) was correct when she said "You hear with your ears, you see with your eyes but you LEARN with your FINGERS !"
I'll keep on just 'playing around' with all those controls, even though most of the results will probably be unfit for posting.
But, as they say, "The man who never made a mistake, never made anything !"
Peter
My wife (ex schoolteacher) was correct when she said "You hear with your ears, you see with your eyes but you LEARN with your FINGERS !"
I'll keep on just 'playing around' with all those controls, even though most of the results will probably be unfit for posting.
But, as they say, "The man who never made a mistake, never made anything !"
Peter
Posted 24/10/2012 - 12:27
Link
I'm not sure of the value of an exact listing type approach of features, as each has different degrees of control and additional expanding options once you get into them. Lets not get into point scoring - I am happy for my claims to be put under the spotlight in the interests of greater awareness and helpfulness, about both alternatives.
There is one addtional key thing to understand - there are 2 (current)versions of ACR that people will have access to : 1 is for the full photoshop, and the other is for Photoshop Elements.
Smeggy is right to point out that there is some selective editing capability in ACR (such as the Grad filters and brushes) but this is mostly implemeted in the full PS version I understand. Elements users don't have the same range of this type of thing, its important to make that distinction.
That said, ACR is designed to carry out the initial RAW conversion and and key adjustments and then open the image into PS (or Lightroom, as I understand LR used ACR also?) for additional editing towards the 'finished output' in my words.
PCU4 is designed differently. It combines the purely RAW adjustment functions (Peter has listed a number above) with the software implementation of Pentax's 'in camera' edit parameters - eg: shadow / highlight corrections, Lens distortion / abberation / marginal lumination corrections, colour fine tuning (the wheel), and the Custom Image Parameters. These incluse all the presets (landscape / portrait / natural / vibrant etc etc, fine contrast controls, satutration etc.)
Now, these in camera controls are designed to produce a quality JPEG from the camera - not something that we would want to continue editing on a lot. Thay are designed to produce a more 'finished' output from the camera than a RAW, with user controlled edits applied to the image.
When implementing these controls through PCU4 we are therefore simply producing this more finished product on the computer - so my claim of it being able to produce a more finished output is related to this difference in the kind of features the between ACR and PCU4, and how the programs are set up to operate - ACR is designed primarily to convert a RAW and open into PS, PCU4 can be used for this alone, or with the additional 'in camera' features (which are designed to output a finished JPEG).
There is one addtional key thing to understand - there are 2 (current)versions of ACR that people will have access to : 1 is for the full photoshop, and the other is for Photoshop Elements.
Smeggy is right to point out that there is some selective editing capability in ACR (such as the Grad filters and brushes) but this is mostly implemeted in the full PS version I understand. Elements users don't have the same range of this type of thing, its important to make that distinction.
That said, ACR is designed to carry out the initial RAW conversion and and key adjustments and then open the image into PS (or Lightroom, as I understand LR used ACR also?) for additional editing towards the 'finished output' in my words.
PCU4 is designed differently. It combines the purely RAW adjustment functions (Peter has listed a number above) with the software implementation of Pentax's 'in camera' edit parameters - eg: shadow / highlight corrections, Lens distortion / abberation / marginal lumination corrections, colour fine tuning (the wheel), and the Custom Image Parameters. These incluse all the presets (landscape / portrait / natural / vibrant etc etc, fine contrast controls, satutration etc.)
Now, these in camera controls are designed to produce a quality JPEG from the camera - not something that we would want to continue editing on a lot. Thay are designed to produce a more 'finished' output from the camera than a RAW, with user controlled edits applied to the image.
When implementing these controls through PCU4 we are therefore simply producing this more finished product on the computer - so my claim of it being able to produce a more finished output is related to this difference in the kind of features the between ACR and PCU4, and how the programs are set up to operate - ACR is designed primarily to convert a RAW and open into PS, PCU4 can be used for this alone, or with the additional 'in camera' features (which are designed to output a finished JPEG).
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


409 posts
15 years
I'd like to use it for processing RAW images but find the user interface rather less than intuitive !!!
HELP !
Peter