Decent Fisheye for occasional use

mattie
Posted 12/07/2012 - 19:18 Link
The missus went on an excellent photo course given by Nigel goldsmith at the University in Bath, and now the 'bug's bit' wants to experiment.

To this end, she's keen on a fisheye lens. I will admit to being a bit less enthusiastic, but I'd be happy to indulge her if I could find a decent lens at a sensible price - I've seen a few short primes going for near enough £500 which is well outside budget.

Any recommendations? Happy to go with a prime, and not bothered if it's a PKA mount (but would prefer to avoid PK as the metering would throw her). Price would be £100 or ideally less, as it's not a 'front-line' lens but something we'd play with now and again.

All advice gratefully received
snappychappy
Posted 12/07/2012 - 19:26 Link
Samyang do a good fisheye although no autofocus, it gives excellent results. LINKY

This was taken in our local supermarket, much too the embarresment of the GG

Comment Image

I hate shopping by SFB579 , on Flickr
Edited by snappychappy: 12/07/2012 - 19:27
vic cross
Posted 12/07/2012 - 20:18 Link
As it is just for a tryout why don't you get one of the attachments that are advertised in practical photography--Digital photo etc.etc. They give fisheye and with the front lens screwed off then onto your lens they also give magnification. I had one when I started and they aren't bad for the price although obviously not as good as the real thing. You and your wife could have some fun for not too much layout.
CHEERS Vic.
PS I'll try to find an advert in the next day or two and let you know as long as you're not in to much of a hurry. Vic.
Born again biker with lots of Pentax bits. Every day I wake up is a good day. I'm so old I don't even buy green bananas.
CoDa
Posted 12/07/2012 - 21:29 Link
SRS have a screw on adapter here

Regards
Colin

“Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.”
Edmund Burke (1729 – 1797)


[IMG]http://i941.photobucket.com/albums/ad254/weldingblues/K-7userbar-red.jpg[/IMG]
Smeggypants
Posted 13/07/2012 - 03:13 Link
mattie wrote:
The missus went on an excellent photo course given by Nigel goldsmith at the University in Bath, and now the 'bug's bit' wants to experiment.

To this end, she's keen on a fisheye lens. I will admit to being a bit less enthusiastic, but I'd be happy to indulge her if I could find a decent lens at a sensible price - I've seen a few short primes going for near enough £500 which is well outside budget.

Any recommendations? Happy to go with a prime, and not bothered if it's a PKA mount (but would prefer to avoid PK as the metering would throw her). Price would be £100 or ideally less, as it's not a 'front-line' lens but something we'd play with now and again.

All advice gratefully received
I don't understand this common attitude to fish eyes. I use my DA10-17 all the time. Fantastic lens, great quality and not every shot is obviously 'fisheye'

Spend some time looking at examples here

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/lens-clubs/33549-fisheye-fever-club-flaunt-your-fisheye-photos.html

and you may change your mindset
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
vic cross
Posted 13/07/2012 - 09:22 Link
CoDa has hit the nail on the head. Not that expensive and a good way of trying out if your ever loving REALLY likes fish eye. I won't bother looking now as it's been done.
CHEERS Vic.
Born again biker with lots of Pentax bits. Every day I wake up is a good day. I'm so old I don't even buy green bananas.
petrochemist
Posted 13/07/2012 - 11:24 Link
I've a couple of the adapters and they're not too bad, but a very long way short of the DA10-17, as Smeggy says it doesn't always give the fisheye look.

Second hand trade in the 10=-17 is always good, so if you don't like it you can recoop most of your cash, & pass it on for someone else to try.

The adapters do have one advantage though - you can mount a filter between the lens & the adapter - which is the one reason why I'm keeping mine. (Fisheye infra red...)
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.

.[size=11:].FlickrWPFPanoramio
sterretje
Posted 14/07/2012 - 06:37 Link
Although it's not the same, some PP software has the option to create fisheye effects.
Pentax K10D + Vivitar 55/2.8 macro + Super Takumar 55/1.8 + SuperMultiCoated Takumar 85/1.8 + SuperMultiCoated Takumar 135/3.5 + SuperMultiCoated Takumar 200/4 + Super Takumar 300/4
Pentax K100D + DA18-55ALII + DA55-300
Pentax K5 + FA31Ltd + M50/1.7 + DFA100WR + M120/2.8 (+ DA18-55WR at occasion)
Smeggypants
Posted 14/07/2012 - 23:52 Link
petrochemist wrote:
I've a couple of the adapters and they're not too bad, but a very long way short of the DA10-17, as Smeggy says it doesn't always give the fisheye look.

Second hand trade in the 10=-17 is always good, so if you don't like it you can recoop most of your cash, & pass it on for someone else to try.

The adapters do have one advantage though - you can mount a filter between the lens & the adapter - which is the one reason why I'm keeping mine. (Fisheye infra red...)
Good advice

I bought mine 2nd hand. it was pristine. I'll never sell it though
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
doingthebobs
Posted 15/07/2012 - 00:23 Link
The 10-17 is a very versatile lens.

It's not just for fishy pictures.
link

But it does that well.
link

I wouldn't part with mine.
Bob
Edited by doingthebobs: 15/07/2012 - 00:30
Smeggypants
Posted 15/07/2012 - 01:50 Link
The 10-17 is one Pentax's best thought out designs IMO.

btw Bob, your buttercup pic looked very dull here. Overly bright monitor?
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Edited by Smeggypants: 15/07/2012 - 01:51
tyronet2000
Posted 15/07/2012 - 08:59 Link
Anyone tried one of those Sunagor FE attachments they seem fairly cheap on fleabay etc.
Regards
Stan

PPG
doingthebobs
Posted 15/07/2012 - 15:28 Link
Quote:
Smeggy: btw Bob, your buttercup pic looked very dull here. Overly bright monitor?
Possibly my monitor was a bit bright, but it has been in the gallery for over a year and may have faded it a bit.
Bob
Smeggypants
Posted 15/07/2012 - 20:39 Link
LOL
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
mattie
Posted 17/07/2012 - 21:44 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
mattie wrote:
The missus went on an excellent photo course given by Nigel goldsmith at the University in Bath, and now the 'bug's bit' wants to experiment.

To this end, she's keen on a fisheye lens. I will admit to being a bit less enthusiastic, but I'd be happy to indulge her if I could find a decent lens at a sensible price - I've seen a few short primes going for near enough £500 which is well outside budget.

Any recommendations? Happy to go with a prime, and not bothered if it's a PKA mount (but would prefer to avoid PK as the metering would throw her). Price would be £100 or ideally less, as it's not a 'front-line' lens but something we'd play with now and again.

All advice gratefully received
I don't understand this common attitude to fish eyes. I use my DA10-17 all the time. Fantastic lens, great quality and not every shot is obviously 'fisheye'

Spend some time looking at examples here

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/lens-clubs/33549-fisheye-fever-club-flaunt-your-fisheye-photos.html

and you may change your mindset
The DA10-17 is quite some distance outside my budget, sadly.

In terms of mindset, I'm not a huge fan of the perspective, and certainly not enough to spend two to three hundred pounds on it.
Edited by mattie: 17/07/2012 - 21:45

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo