DA-L 35 test shots vs DA 35 Macro
Posted 27/09/2010 - 15:33
Link
MrCynical wrote:
I've had an eye on the DA35 for quite some time and want to confirm that it'll offer me something more over the DA-L
A lens hood for a start .I've had an eye on the DA35 for quite some time and want to confirm that it'll offer me something more over the DA-L
You have seen Mike has one for sale?
Posted 27/09/2010 - 15:46
Link
Easy enough to put a lens hood on the DA-L version. I'll bet the usual Chinese copyshops will start making something to fit if the lens is a success.
To be honest I don't use a hood on my existing short primes, and I don't seem to have much trouble with flare. Obviously if it has a built-in hood then I'll use it.
To be honest I don't use a hood on my existing short primes, and I don't seem to have much trouble with flare. Obviously if it has a built-in hood then I'll use it.
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 27/09/2010 - 15:53
Link
The new lens looks excellent (I'd expect nothing less though) and is half a stop faster than the DA35 Limited.
Having said that I (as the owner of a DA35 Limited) don't need that half stop of speed but I would miss the Quick Shift, the built in hood and the ability to keep focussing up close until the lens is almost touching the subject.
If I was looking to buy a 35mm lens now I'd still go for the Limited, but I can see equally valid reasons (weight, cost, speed) why people with different needs to mine might go for the DA-L.
It's nice to have a choice in the 35mm arena again.
Having said that I (as the owner of a DA35 Limited) don't need that half stop of speed but I would miss the Quick Shift, the built in hood and the ability to keep focussing up close until the lens is almost touching the subject.
If I was looking to buy a 35mm lens now I'd still go for the Limited, but I can see equally valid reasons (weight, cost, speed) why people with different needs to mine might go for the DA-L.
It's nice to have a choice in the 35mm arena again.
Joining the Q
Posted 27/09/2010 - 16:02
Link
hefty1 wrote:
Having said that I (as the owner of a DA35 Limited) don't need that half stop of speed but I would miss the Quick Shift, the built in hood and the ability to keep focussing up close until the lens is almost touching the subject.
That's my current thinking too: f2.4 isn't going to produce lots more bokeh (not at this focal length anyway) and (IMHO at least) in situations where f2.8 isn't fast enough f2.4 probably won't be either. Plus the DA35 is so shiny Having said that I (as the owner of a DA35 Limited) don't need that half stop of speed but I would miss the Quick Shift, the built in hood and the ability to keep focussing up close until the lens is almost touching the subject.
I suppose I should be grateful that the DA*30 f2 Unicorn didn't make it to this year's Photokina, though when Pentax replace the lens motors in the DA* series with the new (hopefully) reliable ones I'm going to have other LBA issues!
Posted 27/09/2010 - 17:13
Link
hefty1 wrote:
Having said that I (as the owner of a DA35 Limited) don't need that half stop of speed but I would miss the Quick Shift, the built in hood and the ability to keep focussing up close until the lens is almost touching the subject.
Don't forget the build quality Having said that I (as the owner of a DA35 Limited) don't need that half stop of speed but I would miss the Quick Shift, the built in hood and the ability to keep focussing up close until the lens is almost touching the subject.
Must say though that the DAL35 looks sharp wide open and I like the bokeh it produced in those photos.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



965 posts
17 years
Glasgow
Obviously this is important to the Pentax system, but I must confess to an element of self-interest here: I've had an eye on the DA35 for quite some time and want to confirm that it'll offer me something more over the DA-L