DA 18-135 WR
Posted 26/09/2011 - 15:17
Link
Mine arrived this morning (£399 from Park Cameras, new but without box - from a K5 kit). I hope to post feedback and samples soon.
Regards
John
Regards
John
Posted 26/09/2011 - 15:25
Link
Factoid A: A bunch of us (English types) have just invested in this WR lens
Factoid B: Medium term weather forecast for England is now a dry 'Indian Summer'.
Coincidence :
Factoid B: Medium term weather forecast for England is now a dry 'Indian Summer'.
Coincidence :
Posted 26/09/2011 - 15:56
Link
This English type bought hers on a hot, sunny day in April.
It didn't get much use during the summer though, and I may yet sell it, even though I am generally pretty happy with it. Funds are tight and getting tighter and it is an extra for me.
It didn't get much use during the summer though, and I may yet sell it, even though I am generally pretty happy with it. Funds are tight and getting tighter and it is an extra for me.
Posted 26/09/2011 - 17:54
Link
Although I have the DA18-135 WR I have never used it in the rain. It is not that I worry about the camera getting wet but I prefer to keep dry myself. The only time I found the WR really useful was on a windy day when I was trying to photograph a fountain.
Actually it is my current favourite general purpose lens due to its modest size, weight and fast accurate focusing. My pictures seem sharp enough and the reported softness at the borders and vignetting does not seem particularly noticeable in normal use.
Actually it is my current favourite general purpose lens due to its modest size, weight and fast accurate focusing. My pictures seem sharp enough and the reported softness at the borders and vignetting does not seem particularly noticeable in normal use.
Archie
Posted 26/09/2011 - 18:30
Link
Northgrain wrote:
Factoid A: A bunch of us (English types) have just invested in this WR lens
Factoid B: Medium term weather forecast for England is now a dry 'Indian Summer'.
Coincidence :
Well done, Sir.Factoid A: A bunch of us (English types) have just invested in this WR lens
Factoid B: Medium term weather forecast for England is now a dry 'Indian Summer'.
Coincidence :
Would you mind buying snow shoes, ice axes, sou-westers, heavy fleeces, 4x4 vehicles, a couple of St Bernards, and about 1000 tons of coal.
That should guarantee a mild winter.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 26/09/2011 - 18:53
Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Would you mind buying snow shoes, ice axes, sou-westers, heavy fleeces, 4x4 vehicles, a couple of St Bernards, and about 1000 tons of coal.
That should guarantee a mild winter.
G
Buy some skates - you may need them to get off your boat Northgrain wrote:
Factoid A: A bunch of us (English types) have just invested in this WR lens
Factoid B: Medium term weather forecast for England is now a dry 'Indian Summer'.
Coincidence :
Well done, Sir.Factoid A: A bunch of us (English types) have just invested in this WR lens
Factoid B: Medium term weather forecast for England is now a dry 'Indian Summer'.
Coincidence :
Would you mind buying snow shoes, ice axes, sou-westers, heavy fleeces, 4x4 vehicles, a couple of St Bernards, and about 1000 tons of coal.
That should guarantee a mild winter.
G
I've already bought the snow boots, thermals and fleeces and since the WR lens didn't help with the summer maybe we'll have record snow fall to go with the record wet summer.
Posted 27/09/2011 - 22:11
Link
It is a nice lens, ignore the measurebators. Does exactly what is says on the tin, good all weather walk around lens with fast AF and nice bokeh.
Had to hand mine to my wife as the price for getting a K-5. I may need a second one.
Had to hand mine to my wife as the price for getting a K-5. I may need a second one.
Posted 27/09/2011 - 22:57
Link
Tyr wrote:
It is a nice lens, ignore the measurebators.
I have to say, my recent thread on my experiences with the 18-135 will be my last such, given the lack of interest, and suggestions like this.It is a nice lens, ignore the measurebators.
When helpful information such as "nice lens" is preferred to a fairly time-consuming exercise in photographing, cropping, uploading and commenting, in order to give hopefully at least a reasonably objective view, and all the while taking great pains to try and find a balance between ultimate pixel-peeping and real-world examples, the incentive to repeat the exercise does dwindle a little.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 27/09/2011 - 23:52
Link
Chris,
I thought your pictures were very useful, much more so than reading lots of technical details (which I assume is what's meant by 'measurebating'). However they (and others I've seen) do put me off it somewhat, v. my current zooms - if I want something to take the place of both the 16-45 and 24-90, it will probably be the 17-70.
Regards,
Stan
I thought your pictures were very useful, much more so than reading lots of technical details (which I assume is what's meant by 'measurebating'). However they (and others I've seen) do put me off it somewhat, v. my current zooms - if I want something to take the place of both the 16-45 and 24-90, it will probably be the 17-70.
Regards,
Stan
K5IIs, K10D & ME Super with FA24-90, DA16-85, DA55-300, misc old primes; Olympus EM10 & Panasonic LX15.
Posted 28/09/2011 - 00:06
Link
ChrisA wrote:
When helpful information such as "nice lens" is preferred to a fairly time-consuming exercise in photographing, cropping, uploading and commenting, in order to give hopefully at least a reasonably objective view, and all the while taking great pains to try and find a balance between ultimate pixel-peeping and real-world examples, the incentive to repeat the exercise does dwindle a little.
I found your set of photos illustrating the strengths and weaknesses of the DA18-135 very useful. linkTyr wrote:
It is a nice lens, ignore the measurebators.
I have to say, my recent thread on my experiences with the 18-135 will be my last such, given the lack of interest, and suggestions like this.It is a nice lens, ignore the measurebators.
When helpful information such as "nice lens" is preferred to a fairly time-consuming exercise in photographing, cropping, uploading and commenting, in order to give hopefully at least a reasonably objective view, and all the while taking great pains to try and find a balance between ultimate pixel-peeping and real-world examples, the incentive to repeat the exercise does dwindle a little.
I think Tyr's point was that the lens has had some rather damning reviews due to measurable deficiencis such as vignetting and softness at the borders etc., but that in normal day to day useage it is a very nice lens in size, weight and rapid, silent focus which are less easily scored attributes.
Archie
Posted 28/09/2011 - 00:09
Link
Chris, don't underestimate the number of silent viewers who are watching and learning. Your pictures may have been more useful to more people than you realise.
Best regards, John
Posted 28/09/2011 - 07:52
Link
I looked and learned
Posted 28/09/2011 - 07:55
Link
Chris- I read your post on the 18-135 and i found it useful. I have no problem with the folks who like the lens.
Your images make me think that the lens falls a little short in the IQ department- I know all reviews are subjective, however every review from JRs to yours to the various magazines have commented that the lens could be better in terms of IQ. The disappointing thing is that other marques appear to have better IQ from lenses that go past 200mm at the long end.
Its a lot of money for an average performer- granted it is small, handles well and focuses fast, but for me that doesn't reveal itself in the final image. Border performance is important for lots of photography and you have shown this lens isn't the best here.
It is very good info for a potential buyer.
Your images make me think that the lens falls a little short in the IQ department- I know all reviews are subjective, however every review from JRs to yours to the various magazines have commented that the lens could be better in terms of IQ. The disappointing thing is that other marques appear to have better IQ from lenses that go past 200mm at the long end.
Its a lot of money for an average performer- granted it is small, handles well and focuses fast, but for me that doesn't reveal itself in the final image. Border performance is important for lots of photography and you have shown this lens isn't the best here.
It is very good info for a potential buyer.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1432 posts
17 years
Chester,
U.K.
Davex.
Please feel free to play with any images I post.
My flickr: link