DA 18-135 - how is it without a hood?
Posted 29/12/2017 - 09:45
Link
There are also some screw-on type petal hoods available, e.g. -
4YAAOSwQS1aLQJm">http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lens-Hood-Universal-62mm-black-for-Pentax-smc-DA-18-13...
Philip
4YAAOSwQS1aLQJm">http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lens-Hood-Universal-62mm-black-for-Pentax-smc-DA-18-13...
Philip
Posted 29/12/2017 - 10:02
Link
I have not used the lens without the hood, I use it for protection as I don't use filters. But I'd be very sceptical about how effective it is considering the 18-135 range.
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 29/12/2017 - 10:03
Link
Flare is the enemy without a hood. It's also worth thinking about damage. If a lens gets knocked then the hood will invariably absorb the shock. A metal one won't as well as a plastic one does.
Why mess about using a screw-in hood when a slick bayonet one intended for the lens is available. A hood was with the lens when new, so if it's missing a price reduction might be worth asking for?
Why mess about using a screw-in hood when a slick bayonet one intended for the lens is available. A hood was with the lens when new, so if it's missing a price reduction might be worth asking for?
Best regards, John
Posted 29/12/2017 - 23:51
Link
I have bought from microglobe before - from the shop; they do exist!
Andy
Posted 30/12/2017 - 06:21
Link
Protection is the biggest advantage
As regards flare the hood is not that effective; I still have to use my hat or my hand on occasions to "impede flare" if that is the right term.
I honestly don't see that this lens suffers with flare anymore than other Pentax wide angle zooms and it is permantly mounted on my old K3 which is always with me, so it does get almost daly use and is by far my favourite walkaround , " have go at anything lens".
I have posted several times on this little Gem, so I won't sing its praises again. Except to underline that flare is not an issue anymore than is the case with my other other more expensive w/a lenses and rarely bothers me.,
Don't hesitate it is an absolute "corker"
See this thread re this lens;
As regards flare the hood is not that effective; I still have to use my hat or my hand on occasions to "impede flare" if that is the right term.
I honestly don't see that this lens suffers with flare anymore than other Pentax wide angle zooms and it is permantly mounted on my old K3 which is always with me, so it does get almost daly use and is by far my favourite walkaround , " have go at anything lens".
I have posted several times on this little Gem, so I won't sing its praises again. Except to underline that flare is not an issue anymore than is the case with my other other more expensive w/a lenses and rarely bothers me.,
Don't hesitate it is an absolute "corker"
See this thread re this lens;
Daronl wrote:
Sorry about the portrait orientations ; don't why that happened so hear thry are again


Sorry about the portrait orientations ; don't why that happened so hear thry are again


Daronl wrote:
Decided to leave the K1 and DFA's at home for this trip and travel light taking my favourite travel set up, K3/18-135 and it did a good job of these "snapshots" (which is what they are).
Critiques and comments appreciated, particularly on No 8, the "boat in the cave shot" ( ISO 51,2000 hand held ).















Decided to leave the K1 and DFA's at home for this trip and travel light taking my favourite travel set up, K3/18-135 and it did a good job of these "snapshots" (which is what they are).
Critiques and comments appreciated, particularly on No 8, the "boat in the cave shot" ( ISO 51,2000 hand held ).















Daronl
Posted 31/12/2017 - 07:13
Link
Alas, this opportunity slipped through my fingers, but the 18-135 is still on my wish list and I hope to get one before too long.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2309 posts
14 years
Madrid / Edinburgh
I might have a chance to buy a used copy of this lens at a good price but I suspect it doesn't have the hood. It looks like there are no third parties manufacturing replacement hoods so that would leave me three options:
1. Use it without any hood
2. Pay for a genuine one, which costs far more than a simple piece of plastic has any right to (45 quid normally, Microglobe (who I've never used, have it for 21.16 GBP)
3. Use a collapsable 62mm rubber hood
So I wanted to ask if anyone here has any experience of using this lens without the hood - how is it with regards to image quality?
Of course, if anyone has any links to third-party or cheap genuine Pentax hoods for this lens then that would be more than welcome too.
Many thanks
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses