CVS processing
Posted 28/04/2010 - 23:44
Link
It puts dust on the sensor into perspective I guess.
There are a few things that might help. Before scanning, carefully clean the negatives. I use a microfibre cloth these days.
The second line of attack is to use a scanner with DigitalICE, which very effectively removes scratches and dust marks.
Finally, it's down to the clone tool and patch tool. The only consolation is that it's much easier than spotting prints.
Hope that helps.
There are a few things that might help. Before scanning, carefully clean the negatives. I use a microfibre cloth these days.
The second line of attack is to use a scanner with DigitalICE, which very effectively removes scratches and dust marks.
Finally, it's down to the clone tool and patch tool. The only consolation is that it's much easier than spotting prints.
Hope that helps.
Best regards, John
Posted 29/04/2010 - 00:02
Link
I have some PEC-12 and some cleaning tissues so I'll give it a wipe over and try again. My Minolta scanner has "dust removal" but not DigitalICE so I'll have to go with what I have.
What is annoying is that these are fresh out of the sleeves and they are in worse condition than my 30 year old negs! The shop scans are better although quite low res (1908 x 1272) so I guess the damage occurred when they cut them up and put them in the neg sleeves. I'll have to find somewhere better next time, or buy myself a daylight dev tank and leave it in NY!
For comparison, here is a reduced version of the shop scan:

Is it possible to clean inside a scanner? Perhaps wave an Arctic Butterfly inside?
Best wishes, Kris.
What is annoying is that these are fresh out of the sleeves and they are in worse condition than my 30 year old negs! The shop scans are better although quite low res (1908 x 1272) so I guess the damage occurred when they cut them up and put them in the neg sleeves. I'll have to find somewhere better next time, or buy myself a daylight dev tank and leave it in NY!
For comparison, here is a reduced version of the shop scan:

Is it possible to clean inside a scanner? Perhaps wave an Arctic Butterfly inside?
Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 29/04/2010 - 01:44
Link
womble wrote:
Is it possible to clean inside a scanner? Perhaps wave an Arctic Butterfly inside?
Yeah why not?Is it possible to clean inside a scanner? Perhaps wave an Arctic Butterfly inside?
Be carefully not to scratch it though...
Posted 01/05/2010 - 10:16
Link
You should have used Pentax Pete's Processing service for your XP2 -- I can do C41 at £2-50 a roll ( but NOT any 'scans'onto disk - don't know how to 'burn things onto disks' )
Been a member of Pentax Club since the Ron Spillman era! Got COMPUTERISED at last - DIGITISED?
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Posted 01/05/2010 - 22:34
Link
Peter Elgar wrote:
You should have used Pentax Pete's Processing service for your XP2 -- I can do C41 at £2-50 a roll ( but NOT any 'scans'onto disk - don't know how to 'burn things onto disks' )
The reason I was trying the XP2 / store processing route was to and avoid the fogging problem I had with the three rolls you processed for me last time! My cunning plan was to buy the XP2 in the US and get it developed before I came home so it didn't get x-rayed.You should have used Pentax Pete's Processing service for your XP2 -- I can do C41 at £2-50 a roll ( but NOT any 'scans'onto disk - don't know how to 'burn things onto disks' )
Oh well...
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 01/05/2010 - 22:47
Link
I'd never had problems before, Stefan, but then I used to be carrying ISO 64 film not ISO 400. I am plotting to take the Horseman to NY at some point and then I really will get it hand inspected. Sheet film is too expensive to waste.
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 07/05/2010 - 12:38
Link
Coming back from USA Florida (for the second attempt - was stranded ! ) I asked for a 'Hand Inspection' of films and OK the first time-- the security bloke just passed it around the X-ray machine and looked into the plastic slide boxes containing mine and my boy's 35mm cassettes-- the second time a week later I asked again and told them I had already had a hand inspection but this time a security man dabbed every one of 18 cassettes of film with a pad and liquid to see if there was any explosive powder on them .
Been a member of Pentax Club since the Ron Spillman era! Got COMPUTERISED at last - DIGITISED?
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



7684 posts
18 years
Hertfordshire,
mostly.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.