continuous flash shooting
Some photogs use Quantum Turbo flash with an external battery pack. Very efficient and more expensive than what the casual photographer can afford. Here is a link: ]http://www.quantum-flash.ca/generic.htm?ECINFO=QUANTUM-QFLASH-NEW-TRIO
Unfortunately Quantum dont support current Pentax cameras and flashes which is why I use the old Pentax AF400t flashguns with a Quantum battery. They really do keep up with continuous shooting and you get 1000 flashes per charge. The battery packs are very well made in leather cases and its basically a small lead acid car battery inside.
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
The capacitor has a charge to deliver one flash at 1/1 power so at 1/2 power you can get 2 flashes after each other, ect.
If you shoot with p-ttl then use a wider aperture or higher ISO.
Lower the flash output off the lens.
If you mean "use a wider/larger aperture", why not say so?
Although MikeS hasn't been back since his original post, he did say he was not an experienced photographer and 'geek speak' isn't going to help him very much.
I don't know what your problem is, flash output is quite understandable.
flash = burst of light
output = (something that comes out) production, energy, power, ect.
I don't think the OP is retarded
If you mean "use a wider/larger aperture", why not say so?
Just for you i'll "explain" my other two sentences to make it clear for you.
The capacitor has a charge to deliver one flash at 1/1 power so at 1/2 power you can get 2 flashes after each other, ect.
(Peter this is what I mean with lowering the flash output)
The flash hold a charge for one full power flash so if the flash fires at half the power you can take two flashes instead of one and if you use 1/4th of the power you can have four flashes.
If you shoot with p-ttl then use a wider aperture or higher ISO.
Also shortening the distance between the flash and the subject reduce the flash output that's needed
With A mode it's the same but you need to input the numbers manual (f-number and ISO)
With Manual mode you've a simple scale that you can control; 1/1 is full power, 1/2 is half power, 1/4 is fourth power, ect.
Of course you need to compensate the lost of flash light/power with either the f-number or the ISO.
Changing the shutterspeed won't work because a flash only takes 1/100.000 of a second (if not less) so with the shutterspeed you control solely the amount of ambient light that falls on the sensor.
Stefan I think part of the problem is that you said "Lower the flash output off the lens.". That's gotta be confusing to a newcomer.
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
To write "Lower the flash output off the lens." for a person new to flash photography is misleading and unhelpful because it is an inaccurate/incomplete statement.
Your verbose explanation is also completely unnecessary for me because I was probably taking flash pictures before your parents even met. I know how a flash works, and how to use it properly. The OP however, needs some uncomplicated information to help him.
Stefan I think part of the problem is that you said "Lower the flash output off the lens.". That's gotta be confusing to a newcomer.
I meant the flash not lens
Your verbose explanation is also completely unnecessary for me because I was probably taking flash pictures before your parents even met. I know how a flash works, and how to use it properly. The OP however, needs some uncomplicated information to help him.
to be honest, if you need to take 2 shots / sec, you either need to be running at 1/64 with good batteries or you ought to be not using flash. Those are the "cheap" answers.
Bret
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
to be honest, if you need to take 2 shots / sec, you either need to be running at 1/64 with good batteries or you ought to be not using flash. Those are the "cheap" answers.
With those you should be able to run at higher powers.
With extra battery pack link
You probably burn out the flash quite fast that way...
Also normal rechargeable are faster with recharging then normal alkaline batteries.
Bret
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1 posts
15 years
I am by no means an experienced photographer - I have a K7 and AF-540FGZ flash. I use it to take indoor sports photos. I often see other photographers with professional-looking equipment take several flash photos in quick succession - 2 or 3 per second.
How do I do this - I've tried all kinds of settings and can't make this happen. Maybe I need to manually set the flash to a very low output so that the recyle time is very short?
any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks