Cokin P filters.
Posted 08/05/2010 - 19:33
Link
who said they were square?
my P121S reads 83 x 99.5mm (no verniers up here, so that will have to be accurate enough). Why should they be square? You have more flexbility this way.
Bret
my P121S reads 83 x 99.5mm (no verniers up here, so that will have to be accurate enough). Why should they be square? You have more flexbility this way.
Bret
my pics: link
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
Posted 08/05/2010 - 21:15
Link
The z-pro are though, at least the one I've besides the graduated ones.
Stefan
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Posted 08/05/2010 - 23:09
Link
bretti_kivi wrote:
who said they were square?
my P121S reads 83 x 99.5mm (no verniers up here, so that will have to be accurate enough). Why should they be square? You have more flexbility this way.
Bret
They are referred to as square on ebay, perhaps it means square corners.who said they were square?
my P121S reads 83 x 99.5mm (no verniers up here, so that will have to be accurate enough). Why should they be square? You have more flexbility this way.
Bret
Pleased with the results so far
Regards
Chris
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
631 posts
17 years
West Wiltshire
My first filter is a P.121F.
Advice would be welcome
Regards
Chris