Butterflys
Posted 03/06/2008 - 19:33
Link
Not bad, Mongoose. Watch your back, Clarky.
G
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 04/06/2008 - 13:46
Link
cheers guys. I would love to go back with the Kiron, preferably on a brighter day. The SR was struggling a bit with the concept of 1/20th at 180mm a few inches from the subject. That combined with the obvious difficulties of focusing accurately at these distances hand held made for a pretty low hit rate of shots which were both in focus and shake free.
you don't have to be mad to post here
but it does help
but it does help
Posted 04/06/2008 - 15:35
Link
#1 is a really good close up.
Like it a lot. What iso did you use. Perhaps a bit noisy.
Like it a lot. What iso did you use. Perhaps a bit noisy.
Posted 04/06/2008 - 17:11
Link
Thanks Nimitz,
yes I was very pleased with #1. As I said it was a pretty dull day so I was forced to use fairly high ISOs to get a workable shutter speed. I think it was about 560. In retrospect I would have been better off without the 2x converter since getting close to the critters generally wasn't a problem, but once I was inside I was unwilling to change lenses because of the very humid atmosphere.
The noise seems to show up more in these web sized versions than in the full size. I always find post processing noise reduction is a difficult ballance between killing the noise and making the image look "plastic". As you can see I haven't mastered it yet!
yes I was very pleased with #1. As I said it was a pretty dull day so I was forced to use fairly high ISOs to get a workable shutter speed. I think it was about 560. In retrospect I would have been better off without the 2x converter since getting close to the critters generally wasn't a problem, but once I was inside I was unwilling to change lenses because of the very humid atmosphere.
The noise seems to show up more in these web sized versions than in the full size. I always find post processing noise reduction is a difficult ballance between killing the noise and making the image look "plastic". As you can see I haven't mastered it yet!
you don't have to be mad to post here
but it does help
but it does help
Posted 06/06/2008 - 10:55
Link
Quote:
I always find post processing noise reduction is a difficult ballance between killing the noise and making the image look "plastic". As you can see I haven't mastered it yet!
That is my big problem as well. When I upload on other photo sites - that is the usual comment - the noise issue.I always find post processing noise reduction is a difficult ballance between killing the noise and making the image look "plastic". As you can see I haven't mastered it yet!
I asked Clarky a few days ago - seems that he kills a lot of noise in silkypix. I might need to look at it again then
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2891 posts
19 years
Wiltshire,
England
I'm sorry, I don't know these guys names. They were taken at ~ F8 and 1/20th, hand held with SR on.
but it does help