Bushy Park this morning
Posted 08/02/2011 - 10:37
Link
I think the second one is deceiving. It's sharp as a tack in the places where it matters. Gareth is right about the first - the top of the reflected column is noticeable by its absence.
The second might come up even better with a crop from the bottom LHS, and a play with brightness, contrast and curves.
The second might come up even better with a crop from the bottom LHS, and a play with brightness, contrast and curves.
Posted 08/02/2011 - 10:42
Link
Both are excellent. Various crops and adjustments have been suggested and the images do invite some tweaks. Be careful not to loose the low-contrast misty feel, however.
Well worth being late for work.
K.
Well worth being late for work.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 08/02/2011 - 13:29
Link
Beautiful shots - Well worth being late for work for IMO. Agree broadly with many of the previous comments although I prefer the second. Both are very accomplished though. I very much like Bushy Park and these capture the mood on a misty morning splendidly
Regards
Regards
Posted 08/02/2011 - 13:34
Link
Both well worth being late for work!
I prefer the second, I think because it has a mysterious feel to it. Might just need a smidge of anti-clockwise straightening (either that or my head does), and perhaps a touch more vibrancy in the colours.
I prefer the second, I think because it has a mysterious feel to it. Might just need a smidge of anti-clockwise straightening (either that or my head does), and perhaps a touch more vibrancy in the colours.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.
Apparently.
Apparently.
Posted 08/02/2011 - 14:42
Link
Both are excellent, lovely subtle tones in each.
David
David
Posted 08/02/2011 - 14:51
Link
Very nice shots, prefer the first one, just...
Passed nearby this morning as I go along the A316 - you made me jealous
Passed nearby this morning as I go along the A316 - you made me jealous
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
Posted 08/02/2011 - 21:10
Link
A bit of subtle tweaking - too subtle perhaps?
[IMG]http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt47/Wilf200D/IMGP46102s.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt47/Wilf200D/IMGP46242s.jpg[/IMG]
Richard
[IMG]http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt47/Wilf200D/IMGP46102s.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt47/Wilf200D/IMGP46242s.jpg[/IMG]
Richard
K30, K200D, DA 18-55 mkII; DA 50-200; DA 35 macro Limited; DA 21 Limited
F 35-70; A 35-105/3.5; M 50/1.7;
PPG
F 35-70; A 35-105/3.5; M 50/1.7;
PPG
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
30 posts
17 years
Sussex
[IMG]http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt47/Wilf200D/BushyPark4610.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i596.photobucket.com/albums/tt47/Wilf200D/BushyPark4624.jpg[/IMG]
Any preferences?
Thanks,
Richard
F 35-70; A 35-105/3.5; M 50/1.7;
PPG