Bucharest in monochrome
Posted 12/08/2010 - 20:41
Link
Very Nice.....Reminds me of Salford
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 12/08/2010 - 20:46
Link
I very much like the dilapidated cinema. What was showing?
Posted 13/08/2010 - 05:30
Link
The Dacians would have turned in their graves to have seen this cinema. There really was no other way but BW to protray this.
Well captured, as is No 3.
Well captured, as is No 3.
Posted 13/08/2010 - 19:29
Link
A fine set, Kris. That cinema is wonderful and, I guess, on borrowed time before the future cathes up with the country. Gritty reportage.
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 13/08/2010 - 19:40
Link
Who said captions were not required? This is an example of the contrary, imho. Although the images are very good on their own, the captions just add that little extra to them.
Best regards
Terry
K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Terry
K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Posted 13/08/2010 - 21:25
Link
terje-l wrote:
Who said captions were not required? This is an example of the contrary, imho. Although the images are very good on their own, the captions just add that little extra to them.
Interesting point.Who said captions were not required? This is an example of the contrary, imho. Although the images are very good on their own, the captions just add that little extra to them.
I think I'd agree with the first one. I find that I'm actually quite liking the way Kris reinforces the irony with his caption. Otherwise, it would have taken me longer to see the significance and I might have looked away before seeing it.
With the second one, I'd disagree. The comic effect is so obvious that the caption is IMO entirely unnecessary, and detracts rather than adding. A bit like when Americans make an ironic joke, and then ruin it completely by tacking 'just kidding' on the end.
With the third one, I can't comment, since I have no idea what it's about, even with the caption. Though I find the composition a bit contrived.
I very much like the irony in the first two, though.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
7681 posts
18 years
Hertfordshire,
mostly.
Now showing at the Cinema Dacia. (Mk1 kit lens)
Why? (DA* 50-135mm lens)
Railway Heroes (DA* 50-135mm lens)
Best wishes, Kris.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.