Bought a K7 today
Posted 05/12/2009 - 23:06
Link
Yes it is lovely - time for some fun tomorrow whatever the weather
K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Posted 06/12/2009 - 13:44
Link
Congrats Will.
I would keep the K10D, it wont fetch much second hand and it has a different type of sensor as the K7 which might come in handy.
I would keep the K10D, it wont fetch much second hand and it has a different type of sensor as the K7 which might come in handy.
Posted 07/12/2009 - 12:56
Link
I would lone to keep the K10 stefan & I will shed a tear when it goes but I have to be realistic and I am not at the level yet where i will need or use 2 bodies so it would just go to waste.
On another note i tried the burst/multiple capture mode on the K7 and its really impressive - i am still reading the instruction book and learning the menus etc but all good so far.
On another note i tried the burst/multiple capture mode on the K7 and its really impressive - i am still reading the instruction book and learning the menus etc but all good so far.
K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Posted 08/12/2009 - 22:17
Link
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
K5mk.IIs with 17-70mm DA and Sigma 70-300mm DA lenses. Before digital I used the P30T when using Fujichrome Velvia.
Posted 08/12/2009 - 22:42
Link
High ISO is better on the K7 but ISO200 is the native ISO of that sensor meaning that ISO100 on the K10D is better but up to iso400 there is little difference between them.
White-balance is better on the K7 and so is focusing, it also has an AF assist light to help in low light.
White-balance is better on the K7 and so is focusing, it also has an AF assist light to help in low light.
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:20
Link
No the Samsung sensor native iso is 200, that's why extended dynamic range limits you to that.
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:21
Link
david1 wrote:
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
~Pete
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:29
Link
Anvh wrote:
High ISO is better on the K7 but ISO200 is the native ISO of that sensor meaning that ISO100 on the K10D is better but up to iso400 there is little difference between them.White-balance is better on the K7 and so is focusing, it also has an AF assist light to help in low light.
High ISO is better on the K7 but ISO200 is the native ISO of that sensor meaning that ISO100 on the K10D is better but up to iso400 there is little difference between them.White-balance is better on the K7 and so is focusing, it also has an AF assist light to help in low light.
iceblinker wrote:
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.
I would agree with both of the above - the metering is much improved
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.
K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Posted 09/12/2009 - 08:23
Link
Will,
I hope you are enjoying the K7. It is an awesome bit of kit. Hardly touch my K10d now. However keeping it as a back up & to shoot remotely behind the goal at football.
with regards to the white balance on the K7 I often shoot football in lighting that can change from quite bright to floodlit over the course of the game. just leaving the K7 on auto white balance copes with it very well.
I hope you are enjoying the K7. It is an awesome bit of kit. Hardly touch my K10d now. However keeping it as a back up & to shoot remotely behind the goal at football.
with regards to the white balance on the K7 I often shoot football in lighting that can change from quite bright to floodlit over the course of the game. just leaving the K7 on auto white balance copes with it very well.
Posted 09/12/2009 - 15:38
Link
iceblinker wrote:
Thanks for the advice I may well upgrade my K10 body to the K7 body in January. Today I part exchanged my 18-55mm kit lens that I got with the K10 for the Pentax 17-70mm lens. The Pentax dealer shop in Seaford was selling the lens for £399, I got £100 for my 18-55mm lens, so I got the new lens for £299 which is not bad considering Park Camera's are selling it for £479. http://www.parkcameras.com/9771/Pentax-17-70mm-SMC-DA-F4-AL-IF-SDM.html
david1 wrote:
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
K5mk.IIs with 17-70mm DA and Sigma 70-300mm DA lenses. Before digital I used the P30T when using Fujichrome Velvia.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



228 posts
22 years
Somerset UK
just charged up the battery and updated the firmware to version 1.02 and I have to say initial impressions are excellent - i love the burse rate which is impressive, the metering also appears to be spot, on as i have a mix of daylight and warm energy saving lights in our main room and it handled it very very well- the focus assist light is a useful addition and helps.
I have upgraded from my beloved K10d so now i have the difficult decision of wether to keep the K10 as a backup or move it on to someone who might use it more and i can use the money to spend towards some better lenses
K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass