Bought a K7 today

selectcase
Posted 05/12/2009 - 22:57 Link
Well i went to look at one as I had to handle one before I made a decision - local currys & LCE shops had Nikon D300s and canon 50d's which are nice but i really like the pentax features - so i had to travel 55 miles to find a pentax pro dealer with one in stock. I was worried about the size but its great - i bought it with the twin wr lens deal - i didnt intend to get the lenses but they actually feel really good and of course they are water resistant.

just charged up the battery and updated the firmware to version 1.02 and I have to say initial impressions are excellent - i love the burse rate which is impressive, the metering also appears to be spot, on as i have a mix of daylight and warm energy saving lights in our main room and it handled it very very well- the focus assist light is a useful addition and helps.

I have upgraded from my beloved K10d so now i have the difficult decision of wether to keep the K10 as a backup or move it on to someone who might use it more and i can use the money to spend towards some better lenses

K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Edited by selectcase: 05/12/2009 - 22:58
Unlocker
Posted 05/12/2009 - 23:00 Link
Congrats!

Easy decision once you hold one!
selectcase
Posted 05/12/2009 - 23:06 Link
Yes it is lovely - time for some fun tomorrow whatever the weather

K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Greytop
Posted 05/12/2009 - 23:09 Link
Congratulations Will

I'm sure as you use it you will like it more and more
Regards Huw

flickr
jaco
Posted 06/12/2009 - 07:56 Link
Very good choice, I love mine.
Claudio
DA*16-50
Anvh
Posted 06/12/2009 - 13:44 Link
Congrats Will.

I would keep the K10D, it wont fetch much second hand and it has a different type of sensor as the K7 which might come in handy.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
selectcase
Posted 07/12/2009 - 12:56 Link
I would lone to keep the K10 stefan & I will shed a tear when it goes but I have to be realistic and I am not at the level yet where i will need or use 2 bodies so it would just go to waste.

On another note i tried the burst/multiple capture mode on the K7 and its really impressive - i am still reading the instruction book and learning the menus etc but all good so far.

K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
david1
Posted 08/12/2009 - 22:17 Link
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
K5mk.IIs with 17-70mm DA and Sigma 70-300mm DA lenses. Before digital I used the P30T when using Fujichrome Velvia.
Edited by david1: 08/12/2009 - 22:20
Anvh
Posted 08/12/2009 - 22:42 Link
High ISO is better on the K7 but ISO200 is the native ISO of that sensor meaning that ISO100 on the K10D is better but up to iso400 there is little difference between them.

White-balance is better on the K7 and so is focusing, it also has an AF assist light to help in low light.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Greytop
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:13 Link
David, welcome to the forum
Another benefit is of course the fairly big step is resolution which gives you quite a bit more latitude to crop images.

Stefan I thought it was the K-x that's native ISO is 200 rather than the K-7

Huw
Regards Huw

flickr
Anvh
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:20 Link
No the Samsung sensor native iso is 200, that's why extended dynamic range limits you to that.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 08/12/2009 - 23:20
iceblinker
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:21 Link
david1 wrote:
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.
~Pete
Edited by iceblinker: 08/12/2009 - 23:22
selectcase
Posted 08/12/2009 - 23:29 Link
Anvh wrote:
High ISO is better on the K7 but ISO200 is the native ISO of that sensor meaning that ISO100 on the K10D is better but up to iso400 there is little difference between them.White-balance is better on the K7 and so is focusing, it also has an AF assist light to help in low light.
iceblinker wrote:
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.
I would agree with both of the above - the metering is much improved

K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Edited by selectcase: 08/12/2009 - 23:33
mike3legs
Posted 09/12/2009 - 08:23 Link
Will,

I hope you are enjoying the K7. It is an awesome bit of kit. Hardly touch my K10d now. However keeping it as a back up & to shoot remotely behind the goal at football.

with regards to the white balance on the K7 I often shoot football in lighting that can change from quite bright to floodlit over the course of the game. just leaving the K7 on auto white balance copes with it very well.
david1
Posted 09/12/2009 - 15:38 Link
iceblinker wrote:
david1 wrote:
I'm currently thinking about trading in my K10D which I've had for about 2 year's now for the K7. Is there a huge amount of difference between the K10 and K7 in terms image quality and sharpness to justify this? I've found in the past the K10 struggles a bit with grain and white balance when taken shots in low lighting conditions and on high ISO setting, has the K7 sorted out these issues? Any advice would be appreciated, cheers.
With RAW iamges, I find the K-7's noise (grain) is quite high at high and even medium ISO settings, but resolution, white balance and metering is improved, and you get numerous extra features to make using the camera more enjoyable.
Thanks for the advice I may well upgrade my K10 body to the K7 body in January. Today I part exchanged my 18-55mm kit lens that I got with the K10 for the Pentax 17-70mm lens. The Pentax dealer shop in Seaford was selling the lens for £399, I got £100 for my 18-55mm lens, so I got the new lens for £299 which is not bad considering Park Camera's are selling it for £479. http://www.parkcameras.com/9771/Pentax-17-70mm-SMC-DA-F4-AL-IF-SDM.html
K5mk.IIs with 17-70mm DA and Sigma 70-300mm DA lenses. Before digital I used the P30T when using Fujichrome Velvia.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo