Body Scanner
Posted 25/03/2010 - 16:33
Link
The ones at Schiphol only show a computerised cartoonesque image of a person, not the actual image.
I think the one used in the story is also a scanner using x-rays, such as Schiphol uses for potential drug smugglers, not the like ones used for normal security.
I think the one used in the story is also a scanner using x-rays, such as Schiphol uses for potential drug smugglers, not the like ones used for normal security.
Posted 25/03/2010 - 16:50
Link
Yes you're right Gwyn, the one at Schiphol is a Millimetre wave scanner and the one on Heathrow is a X-ray scatter.
They even use a program now and no one looks at the photos scanned any more, here is more about that link
Make you question why the UK opted for the X-ray scatter...
They even use a program now and no one looks at the photos scanned any more, here is more about that link
Make you question why the UK opted for the X-ray scatter...
Posted 25/03/2010 - 18:32
Link
Probably cheaper, Stefan, though I don't know. Plus it gives the red tops something to write about .
Posted 25/03/2010 - 19:01
Link
Gwyn wrote:
Probably cheaper, Stefan...
That's the UK for you. Why do something properly when you can do it badly to save money?
Probably cheaper, Stefan...
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



10412 posts
18 years
Dordrecht,
the Netherlands
Schiphol (Amsterdam) has a similar device since 15 may 2007 and the USA is using them on some airports since April 2009 without any problems and Heathrow have them since 2 February 2010, any reason you can think off why it doesn't work in England?
At least I know why you're distrusting all the security measurement the government thinks off
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ