Blenheim, 31mm & 77mm Ltds

Unlocker
Posted 08/05/2010 - 02:19 Link
Dilemma time guys & gals! Need help!

After Mannesty's 'should i sell' post, it got me thinking that perhaps I should sell these 2 beauties that just don't get used. Going by prices on here, the £1200 would definately come in handy!

This led me, eventually, to re-visist some photos from last year where I had a new toy to play with! We had gone for a day out at Blenheim Palace, and in the afternoon decided that i would shoot 2x bodies, one with the 31mm Ltd, and the other with the 77mm Ltd, as a kind of 'exercise'.

Now, I did actually take the lenses into work this morning to take some photos and put on the classifieds here. 'One of those days' resulted in that not happening, so here I am questioning my decision!

So, should I sell 'em, or should they be keepers? The head says sell, but the heart....

1.
Comment Image


2.
Comment Image


3.
Comment Image


4.
Comment Image


5.
Comment Image


6.
Comment Image


7.
Comment Image


8.
Comment Image


9.
Comment Image



PS. Been playing with Mobile Me galleries, so made a gallery for these pics here. Thoughts (or offers!) welcome!
i-Berg
Posted 08/05/2010 - 04:42 Link
I'd be hanging on to them!
Mannesty
Posted 08/05/2010 - 07:39 Link
I'll be keeping mine for a while yet. Just look at how the OOF areas are rendered by those lenses.

If you never plan to use them, sell them. If you are happy that your other lenses produce similar enough results, sell them. If you could use the money for other things, sell them.

Otherwise, keep them, and use them.

Simples.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Hardgravity
Posted 08/05/2010 - 07:52 Link
No brainer to me, I'd keep them for that odd use that gives such fantastic results.

But I an a magpie where lenses are concerned...
Cheers, HG

K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.

Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...

PPG entries.
womble
Posted 08/05/2010 - 08:20 Link
Unless you really need the cash for something else you really need/want, keep them. Although, TBH, they are more easily replaced than Mannesty's 135mm, they are true "icons of photography". Both lenses are on my wish list although I think my next expensive purchase (whenever I happen to have some cash to spare ) will be a telephoto. I am very well served for lenses less/equal to 135mm.

(Edit: Apparently the less than/equals to sign isn't allowed...)

Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Edited by womble: 08/05/2010 - 08:22
gartmore
Posted 08/05/2010 - 09:20 Link
I'd sell a kidney before these
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
matwhittington
Posted 08/05/2010 - 09:35 Link
If I had them I would keep them... In the meantime I can dream...

Mat
Mat W

My Flickr: link
bwlchmawr
Posted 08/05/2010 - 10:04 Link
I'll disagree for once. Unless you do lots of portrait work I think I could live without the 70mm, it's not a length I'd use much.

But that 30mm? It would take a crow bar to prise it from my grasp. Just think what my "Dull Morning in the Park" set would have looked like with that on the K100!

I bet Canon or Nikon owners would love to have something which looked like them!

Best wishes,

Andrew
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
thoughton
Posted 08/05/2010 - 10:27 Link
With photos like that surely you have to keep them? Unless you really need the cash now. It's not like they are going to depreciate...
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Clarky
Posted 08/05/2010 - 10:34 Link
I could never sell my 31,77mm ltds, I would usually take one of them with me where ever I go.

Keep em Danny you'll regret it if you didn't,
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
mph555l
Posted 08/05/2010 - 11:09 Link
You have to ask yourself is there something else you want or need that will get more use ? They might be a couple of the best lenses ever made, but if you never use them perhaps you should put them up for sale anyway.

I'm currently mulling over the same thing with some of my little used gear.

It's not easy is it.

Good luck,

/Ian
K10D & Super A user.
nathanever82
Posted 08/05/2010 - 11:31 Link
I am actually in the same quandary as Danny with my 31 ltd...

I've thought about this for a while, and still haven't decided. I haven't been photo-busy recently though, and therefore the little beauty is getting even less use than usual. which is sad.

On the other hand I've noticed how much I enjoyed using another prime i got recently, the DA*200, with which i took some really awesome photos in Florence, last time i was there. Perfect focal lenght for street photography. I didn't even think to bring the 31mm, i just can't find the right niche for its use, be it portraits, street photography, Its just so easily replaceable by the 16-50...

'Between the lights there is always a shadow'

www.nathanservi.com & PPG
paulyrichard
Posted 08/05/2010 - 12:52 Link
Blenheim is a wonderful place in the right light. Could I be forgiven for thinking that the last photo is a model?!
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt

http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
Edited by paulyrichard: 08/05/2010 - 12:53
Unlocker
Posted 08/05/2010 - 15:02 Link
Well, I think that response was pretty convincing!

We do actually have 2 weddings to do this year, so I guess they are on a stay of execution!

The telling thing here I think is that no one has suggested making an offer on them, so they can stay for now, but after the weddings, I'm sure I'm gonna be going back round to Nathan's dilemma!

Did anyone look at the gallery? Would appreciate some feedback on that as they are so damn easy to do, and looking at using them a lot more often!
Unlocker
Posted 08/05/2010 - 15:05 Link
paulyrichard wrote:
Could I be forgiven for thinking that the last photo is a model?!
It sure is, in the same area as the butterfly house.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo