Best raw conversion software?
Posted 13/11/2009 - 09:33
Link
Just to add to this thread:
I downloaded and tried DxO Optics Pro 6 as this promised better noise control.
Yuck! I took a fairly high ISO image from the K20D and it looked like utter mush - all smeary and horrible. Compared it with Silkypix Developer Studio Pro and that brought out so much more detail while still reducing the noise. The difference was unbelievable!
Saved me £70 as well
Matt
I downloaded and tried DxO Optics Pro 6 as this promised better noise control.
Yuck! I took a fairly high ISO image from the K20D and it looked like utter mush - all smeary and horrible. Compared it with Silkypix Developer Studio Pro and that brought out so much more detail while still reducing the noise. The difference was unbelievable!
Saved me £70 as well
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
(For gallery, tips and links)
Posted 13/11/2009 - 11:04
Link
Ok, so if I use CS4, and ACR to convert my DNG's from the K7, which came after CS4. Do I have to update the colour profile for my DNG files from the K7?
Posted 13/11/2009 - 12:10
Link
MattMatic wrote:
Just to add to this thread:
I downloaded and tried DxO Optics Pro 6 as this promised better noise control.
Yuck! I took a fairly high ISO image from the K20D and it looked like utter mush - all smeary and horrible. Compared it with Silkypix Developer Studio Pro and that brought out so much more detail while still reducing the noise. The difference was unbelievable!
Saved me £70 as well
Matt
Totally agree with you there! UGH! Just to add to this thread:
I downloaded and tried DxO Optics Pro 6 as this promised better noise control.
Yuck! I took a fairly high ISO image from the K20D and it looked like utter mush - all smeary and horrible. Compared it with Silkypix Developer Studio Pro and that brought out so much more detail while still reducing the noise. The difference was unbelievable!
Saved me £70 as well
Matt
Been playing with LR v3 beta as well, still seems rather limited in comparison with SP Pro, but the IQ is pretty good now. But it lacks many useful tools that I regularly use in Silkypix Pro, plus some of the tools it does posses are clumsy in operation compared with SP Pro, the one that readily comes to mind is the CA correction facility, nothing compares with the SP eyedropper tool!
LR's only advantage as far as I can see is it's cataloguing ability (as SP Pro now has the ability to do non destructive editing and print directly with correct printing profiles), but then I use IDimager which is superb and can load any collection directly into SP when required. But if SP Pro didn't exist, I think it would be my preferred choice.
Haven't tried Bibble 5 beta yet, but the last versions kept crashing and the output IQ wasn't to my taste either.
Even though there is still room for improvement in SP Pro , IMHO it's definitely the leader of the pack at the moment.
Posted 13/11/2009 - 12:34
Link
nathanever82 wrote:
Ok, so if I use CS4, and ACR to convert my DNG's from the K7, which came after CS4. Do I have to update the colour profile for my DNG files from the K7?
The latest version of ACR (5.5) that works with Bridge/CS4 supports the K-7, you should have "Camera Standard" profile available in the choices offered, as well as "Embedded" and "Adobe Standard" if you open a camera generated (native) DNG. Ok, so if I use CS4, and ACR to convert my DNG's from the K7, which came after CS4. Do I have to update the colour profile for my DNG files from the K7?
For K-7 PEF's you will only have "Adobe Standard" and "Camera Standard"
Just make sure that you keep ACR updated - link
The K-x isn't currently supported, so probably just offers "Beta" with PEF files (as in LR3 beta). I don't have any K-x camera generated DNG files to check with, but I suspect that "Embedded" would be available as the profile should be contained in the DNG format, AFAIK only Adobe use the DNG embedded data with their Raw converters, other converters use separate sidecar files.
You can see the list of supported cameras here: link
Posted 13/11/2009 - 13:21
Link
THank you RIchard
Posted 13/11/2009 - 14:49
Link
Looks like SilkyPix seems to be coming out favourite?
If that's the case, as a 'newbie' to this sort of software, would I be better off going for v4 or jump straight in with Pro?
If that's the case, as a 'newbie' to this sort of software, would I be better off going for v4 or jump straight in with Pro?
Posted 13/11/2009 - 14:52 - Helpful Comment
Link
Pro is no more difficult to use than the other versions. It just has a few extra features - that I'm sure you'll enjoy.
~Pete
Posted 13/11/2009 - 17:40 - Helpful Comment
Link
JohnX wrote:
Looks like SilkyPix seems to be coming out favourite?
But their favourite is not necessary the best choose for you, really just try them all out and give them all a change. They all have a 30 day trial so nothing to lose except some time.Looks like SilkyPix seems to be coming out favourite?
Also since you shoot RAW you will spend quite some time behind the program so pick the one you like is important, every (RAW) photo you upload will need to be processed by the program.
Posted 13/11/2009 - 18:24
Link
Anvh wrote:
KZ do you shoot in PEF or in DNG?
I tried both PEF and DNG. Lightroom recognises K200d in both cases as a "Camera", no more.KZ do you shoot in PEF or in DNG?
KZ
Posted 14/11/2009 - 11:19
Link
Okay KZ, I shoot in PEF and convert it to DNG while importing with Lightroom. It shows the camera model... could it be you have altered some options maybe?
I'm a bit clueless here.
I'm a bit clueless here.
Posted 14/11/2009 - 19:41
Link
Anvh wrote:
Okay KZ, I shoot in PEF and convert it to DNG while importing with Lightroom. It shows the camera model... could it be you have altered some options maybe?
I'm a bit clueless here.
It seems I do the same, but with different result. Theoretically, if it depended on the different settings, it would not show the camera model of the other system either. Maybe K10D is supported, K200D not.... Anyway, tomorrow I will check all the settings of LR.Okay KZ, I shoot in PEF and convert it to DNG while importing with Lightroom. It shows the camera model... could it be you have altered some options maybe?
I'm a bit clueless here.
KZ
Posted 14/11/2009 - 20:22 - Helpful Comment
Link
JohnX wrote:
Looks like SilkyPix seems to be coming out favourite?
If that's the case, as a 'newbie' to this sort of software, would I be better off going for v4 or jump straight in with Pro?
Go for Pro without any doubt, those few extra features are very important and easily worth double!
Looks like SilkyPix seems to be coming out favourite?
If that's the case, as a 'newbie' to this sort of software, would I be better off going for v4 or jump straight in with Pro?
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



10412 posts
18 years
Dordrecht,
the Netherlands
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ