Ball head or 3 way panning head?

Just about to order a tripod from Redsnapper and not sure whether to go for the 284 and 3 way panning head for £66.90 delivered or pay the extra £39.10 for the RHS-12 ball head with the 284.

Any thoughts on whether the ball head is worth the extra and why?

I'll use the tripod anywhere I need to keep the camera absolutely still or in low light. I do a bit of everything. I am trying out a bit of macro, but not too seriously yet until I'm sure I like it. Just using manual 135mm and 50mm with tubes - might try reversing the 50mm. I do a bit of wildlife with a longer lens. Some landscapes with and without a ND filter. And everything and anything in between.

Weight of both is similar, but the maximum load of the ball head is double that of the 3 way head at 10kg. My equipment is nowhere near that at maximum - well less than 3kg mostly.

Any thoughts appreciated

Until recently I would have said Pan head but having just bought a Benro CF tripod with a ball head I much prefer it - the pan head I now find a bit clumsy and cumbersome in use, I'd agree with ken though that a pan head does probably allow for more precise adjustments

Simon

What Ken says is right, but the handles on P&T head get in the way and are a real PITA!
I replaced the P&T head on my tripod with a nice B&S from Giotto's which I'm well pleased with. Whichever you choose you should be able to replace it with something else at a later date if you really don't like it. Unless of course the heads are fixed on the Redsnappers?

I have both and I prefer the ball head for a light/small lens and macro work but my K7's horizon/level indicator is essential for this. For a longer telephoto lens I prefer the Pan head. also if the head has a spirit level built in you can get the tripod and head level before ataching the camera.

Just one point, I find quick release plates very useful, perhaps even essential.

I have both, prefer the quick release ball head when out and about, far more flexible and nimbler. Pan head better for considered shots & rigid work, e.g. studio or astro etc..

Thanks - sounds like I need both and I was trying to save money.......

I think I'll get the panning head for now as it's hardly any more than the tripod alone on offer at present. I can always add the ball head at a later date. (Or perhaps I'll get the ball head now and add the panning head at a later date)

I have just gone through the same debate in my mind, in the end I have gone for the panning 284 version.