Attempt at full moon shot
Posted 11/02/2009 - 08:14
Link
That's a great effort Amin, tiny bit of shake evident but good tones and detail.
I think a teleconverter will not necessarily produce better results, although the moon will be bigger, the optics will be degraded and the lens will be slower - so more shake to deal with.
I think a teleconverter will not necessarily produce better results, although the moon will be bigger, the optics will be degraded and the lens will be slower - so more shake to deal with.
Posted 11/02/2009 - 08:55
Link
Darkmunk wrote:
That's a great effort Amin, tiny bit of shake evident but good tones and detail.
I think a teleconverter will not necessarily produce better results, although the moon will be bigger, the optics will be degraded and the lens will be slower - so more shake to deal with.
MarkThat's a great effort Amin, tiny bit of shake evident but good tones and detail.
I think a teleconverter will not necessarily produce better results, although the moon will be bigger, the optics will be degraded and the lens will be slower - so more shake to deal with.
Thanks, you are right, TC is out of the list, I dont see any much use at least at the moment.
Help me out here a little please, as I dont have a photographer's sharp analytical eyesight , how did you detect the image having a tiny bit of shake? or what particular characteristics or parts of the image you eyed at to notice that? Its just for my understanding thats all.
I had a bunch of shots and found quite hard to compare and decide which one to go for and work a little on PSE. With my limitations in both, taking the shot and editing also I wouldn't be even surprised that I picked up the wrong one, spent ages comparing between them ha .
And you are absolutely right, must be a bit of shake because I was struggling with the tripod. Its when I try to take these shots and the macros ones and I try to minutely focus that I realise how the tripod is definitely the culprit, when I get the spot and tighten all the screws it moves, and shakes and God knows what else lol. Its a cheap Velbon one, so perhaps money will be better spent on a good sturdier tripod.
Thanks
Amin
Amin Photo Gallery
Posted 11/02/2009 - 09:23
Link
It's great fun shooting the moon isn't it? I know it's been done a million times before, but it such a buzz pulling off a good shot with limited equipment
The shake seems to be sideways - just a slight double image rather than just being soft.
The halo on the bottom left and top is caused by the sharpening I think. You could perhaps try going over that with the history brush to lessen the effect.
The tripod should be ok as long as you have a remote or use the 2 second-mirror up facility (or both preferably). If that doesn't work, try catching the moon earlier (when it's lower) and use a bean bag instead of a tripod.
The shake seems to be sideways - just a slight double image rather than just being soft.
The halo on the bottom left and top is caused by the sharpening I think. You could perhaps try going over that with the history brush to lessen the effect.
The tripod should be ok as long as you have a remote or use the 2 second-mirror up facility (or both preferably). If that doesn't work, try catching the moon earlier (when it's lower) and use a bean bag instead of a tripod.
Posted 11/02/2009 - 16:11
Link
Don't get too down hearted with your first attempt. There's lots of factors at play when imaging the moon.
If it's a poor night with unsteady seeing it won't matter what equipement you have or how careful you are taking the shot, it will come out 'soft'.
Also, the 55-300 may not have the resolution for a super sharp image at it's max focal length. Did you stop the lens down a bit? You can up the ISO to compensate, don't worry about noise.
Perhaps try imaging the moon when it's near a quarter phase. There's far more detail on show which makes it far easier to focus and also more impressive as a photo.
When you are happy with the focus fire off a sequence of shots. 20, 30 or even 50. You will have more chance of catching a moment of steady seeing by doing so.
regards
Russ
If it's a poor night with unsteady seeing it won't matter what equipement you have or how careful you are taking the shot, it will come out 'soft'.
Also, the 55-300 may not have the resolution for a super sharp image at it's max focal length. Did you stop the lens down a bit? You can up the ISO to compensate, don't worry about noise.
Perhaps try imaging the moon when it's near a quarter phase. There's far more detail on show which makes it far easier to focus and also more impressive as a photo.
When you are happy with the focus fire off a sequence of shots. 20, 30 or even 50. You will have more chance of catching a moment of steady seeing by doing so.
regards
Russ
Posted 11/02/2009 - 16:27
Link
Russ
Thanks for your advice. I will take them on board and keep a look out on the moon.
Amd Mark, you are absolutely right, is great fun . Definitely enjoying it
thanks for all your help and advice
Thanks for your advice. I will take them on board and keep a look out on the moon.
Amd Mark, you are absolutely right, is great fun . Definitely enjoying it
thanks for all your help and advice
Amin Photo Gallery
Posted 04/11/2009 - 00:14
Link
Great moon shot
Posted 05/11/2009 - 10:16
Link
darlene wrote:
Great moon shot
I can't see a moon shot!
Great moon shot
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2094 posts
17 years
London,
UK
With my limited abilities and experience have been pretty embarrassed to post them here, but on the other hand if I dont do it then I won't be able to improve based on the great feedback and excellent help from the forum members.
So here it goes. Quite a coincidence my little one who is a year and half decided really on the very same night that its a full moon to wake up at odd hours and wander around the house pestering poor mum and dad wanting to munch and then watching cartoons on the TV ha .
As I couldn't sleep obviously with all the havoc I decided to look through the study room window and lo and behold the moon was invitingly staring at me .
I get the feeling that it should have been much sharper. Would it be due to the limitation of my 55-300mm? I read on the forum that a 500mm is really needed for a better shot at the moon.
But as my first one it still leaves me with a satisfied smile. Hope to improve from here and hopefully think of a teleconverter.
Ideas and suggestions greatly appreciated.
Many thanks
Amin