Anyone feeling rich?

Gwyn
Posted 02/07/2009 - 12:16 Link
Greynolds, the cheapest I've seen one here is just over 3000 pounds, mostly nearer 3,500.
So a bargain indeed, good luck in selling it on, if you can bear to part with it .
greynolds999
Posted 02/07/2009 - 12:17 Link
Yes, mine did. It seemed to be the only one in stock as when I looked straight after buying the status had changed. I doubt if there are any hanging around the shops.
Unlocker
Posted 02/07/2009 - 12:19 Link
Well, let's just hope they are daft enough to take the money out of my account then, then they will have to supply!
greynolds999
Posted 02/07/2009 - 12:50 Link
Unlocker wrote:
Well, let's just hope they are daft enough to take the money out of my account then, then they will have to supply!
Well if not I may do you a deal.
shim
Posted 02/07/2009 - 12:50 Link
Unlocker wrote:
Well, let's just hope they are daft enough to take the money out of my account then, then they will have to supply!
Most internet firms now have clauses heavily in their favor, similar to play(dot)com where a contract does not exist until they actually dispatch the item.

shim
Shaky
Posted 02/07/2009 - 13:25 Link
shim wrote:
Most internet firms now have clauses heavily in their favor
Chalk one more up for Johnny Foreigner

Quote:
Dell ordered to sell 19-inch LCD displays for $15 in Taiwan

IDG News Service - Taiwan's Consumer Protection Commission has ordered Dell to make good on sales from an online pricing error and deliver 19-inch LCD monitors to local consumers for $15.

The government agency said it received 471 complaints about the mix-up after Dell corrected the discount to reflect the $146 price it should have given. Prior to the discount, the monitors cost $229.

The pricing mistake was posted online June 25 at 11 p.m. and removed June 26 at 7 a.m. During that eight hour period, 26,000 people placed orders for nearly 140,000 displays.

Full Story:
greynolds999
Posted 02/07/2009 - 13:55 Link
There is an interesting difference in law (and no, I'm not an expert) which basically states there is a difference in offering to sell something which doesn't yet exist.

So if Jessops (for example) agree to sell a lens which is in stock and take your money then they would be duty-bound to sell it, as it could be legally considered to be your property at that point. If they take your money and ask someone else to supply it, and the third party either does not have it or will not make an agreement to sell, then Jessops would not be obliged to provide anything, other than your money back.

I think...
Mongoose
Posted 02/07/2009 - 14:19 Link
a zoom is more involved to design, but that big front element is going to be a pig to grind. There will be a marked difference between design costs and manufacture costs here.

Partly it'll be that primes are niche items for those who desire the highest quality at any cost. They don't make so many so economys of scale cannot be used.
you don't have to be mad to post here



but it does help
johnriley
Posted 02/07/2009 - 15:04 Link
Some of the most expensive lenses are actually made to order. The Pentax 600mm f4 was an example of this.

I read once that the more esoteric items could be finished by just one specialist in the factory, meaning of course that when they went on holiday there was no-one else.
Best regards, John
Mike-P
Posted 08/07/2009 - 22:55 Link
So is THIS anyones lens?
Unlocker
Posted 08/07/2009 - 23:21 Link
Mike-P wrote:
So is THIS anyones lens?
Not guilty!

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo