Another Teleconverter question...

RR
Posted 10/05/2009 - 21:06 Link
I'm trying hard to curtail the LBA whilst waiting on the new body announcement but have been looking at telephotos as my kit is lacking in that dept.

I'm leaning toward getting a 70-200mm f2.8 & a 2x TC so that I can have a stab at street candids & fit the TC for some wildlife shots. Now, although the Sigma 70-200mm looks somewhat softer & has more CA at the longer end than the Tamron, the HSM would prove very valuable I would think (draw less attention in street & not scare wildlife in the field). I'm a little confused as to its compatibility with TC's though. - a few questions if you will:

Will only a Sigma 2X TC retain the HSM AF & give accurate metering, or will any other currently available TC do the job ?
If it is only Sigma, is there a special model no. or denomination I need to look out for ?
Will a TC (Sigma or otherwise), when used with my Sigma 70mm 1:1 Macro, convert it to an effectively 140mm 2:1 Macro or will it be a 140mm 1:1 ?

Anyone have the answers please ?

Cheers, Bob
Mike-P
Posted 10/05/2009 - 21:31 Link
The only teleconverter that will work with HSM and SDM is the Tamron MC4 and possibly certain Kenko 1.5's. The current Sigma teleconverters will not work with Sigma HSM lenses.
RR
Posted 10/05/2009 - 21:35 Link
Ah.. thought you must of got that wrong Mike but I've just found the small print on SIgmas site: (Sony and Pentax fittings will not allow AF when the optional 1.4x or 2x teleconverter is attached.) which is more than a little crappy.
isdky
Posted 10/05/2009 - 21:38 Link
I have a promaster 1.7x teleconverter which gives good results and retains AF for screw and SDM/HSM - metering also seems fairly accurate. Picked it up new from ebay usa last year.

I use it mainly with my Sigma 50-150mm.
"Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." Terry Pratchett

Flickr Photostream
AnnetteW
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:45 Link
Hi Bob,

I went through the same dilemma a couple of months ago and went for the Tamron and used it with a Tamron 1.4x TC and a Kenko 2x TC. AF worked well with the 1.4x but it did hunt pretty badly in poor contrast situations with the 2x.

I used it on a trip to Rwanda recently and the weather was pretty wet - in the bad weather the 2x TC struggled with the poor contrast of a mountain gorilla in the jungle. Interestingly the Pentax/Tamron combination saw off the more expensive Canon and Nikon equivalents used by my friends - both of which saw failures in the wet climate.

Edit: I should also say that I was within 20ft of wild gorillas and whilst the lens isn't the quietest it didn't cause me any problems at all - I got no adverse reactions at all.

All in all, I think the Tamron is a cracking lens.

Hope that helps!

Cheers,

Annette

PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Cameras: 2x K20D/D-BG2 | K10D/D-BG2 | *istD
Prime: Pentax FA50 | Sigma 105 Macro | Pentax DA*300
Zoom: Samsung 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 | Pentax 18-250 | Tamron 28-75 | Pentax DA*50-135 | Tamron 70-200 | Sigma 170-500
T/C: Tamron 1.4x | Pentax 1.7x AF
Flash: Pentax AF-540FGZ
PP: MacBook | iMac | Aperture
Edited by AnnetteW: 10/05/2009 - 22:52
Anvh
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:57 Link
RR wrote:

Will a TC (Sigma or otherwise), when used with my Sigma 70mm 1:1 Macro, convert it to an effectively 140mm 2:1 Macro or will it be a 140mm 1:1 ?
The TC only doubles the focal length but you will keep your focus range, the subject will be 2 times as big at the same focus distance so you're right.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
RR
Posted 11/05/2009 - 00:45 Link
Thanks all for your replies. Has given me more to consider. I think the new body announcement may complicate things further though.

Quote:
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Glad you're enjoying it, I hope it IS mint rather than WAS mint
AnnetteW
Posted 11/05/2009 - 05:25 Link
RR wrote:
Thanks all for your replies. Has given me more to consider. I think the new body announcement may complicate things further though.

Quote:
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Glad you're enjoying it, I hope it IS mint rather than WAS mint
Yes. It is still in mint condition!

I suspect that you are right with regard to the K7 making things complicated! Shame my birthday is so close to Christmas!
Cameras: 2x K20D/D-BG2 | K10D/D-BG2 | *istD
Prime: Pentax FA50 | Sigma 105 Macro | Pentax DA*300
Zoom: Samsung 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 | Pentax 18-250 | Tamron 28-75 | Pentax DA*50-135 | Tamron 70-200 | Sigma 170-500
T/C: Tamron 1.4x | Pentax 1.7x AF
Flash: Pentax AF-540FGZ
PP: MacBook | iMac | Aperture

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo