Another Teleconverter question...
Posted 10/05/2009 - 21:38
Link
I have a promaster 1.7x teleconverter which gives good results and retains AF for screw and SDM/HSM - metering also seems fairly accurate. Picked it up new from ebay usa last year.
I use it mainly with my Sigma 50-150mm.
I use it mainly with my Sigma 50-150mm.
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:45
Link
Hi Bob,
I went through the same dilemma a couple of months ago and went for the Tamron and used it with a Tamron 1.4x TC and a Kenko 2x TC. AF worked well with the 1.4x but it did hunt pretty badly in poor contrast situations with the 2x.
I used it on a trip to Rwanda recently and the weather was pretty wet - in the bad weather the 2x TC struggled with the poor contrast of a mountain gorilla in the jungle. Interestingly the Pentax/Tamron combination saw off the more expensive Canon and Nikon equivalents used by my friends - both of which saw failures in the wet climate.
Edit: I should also say that I was within 20ft of wild gorillas and whilst the lens isn't the quietest it didn't cause me any problems at all - I got no adverse reactions at all.
All in all, I think the Tamron is a cracking lens.
Hope that helps!
Cheers,
Annette
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
I went through the same dilemma a couple of months ago and went for the Tamron and used it with a Tamron 1.4x TC and a Kenko 2x TC. AF worked well with the 1.4x but it did hunt pretty badly in poor contrast situations with the 2x.
I used it on a trip to Rwanda recently and the weather was pretty wet - in the bad weather the 2x TC struggled with the poor contrast of a mountain gorilla in the jungle. Interestingly the Pentax/Tamron combination saw off the more expensive Canon and Nikon equivalents used by my friends - both of which saw failures in the wet climate.
Edit: I should also say that I was within 20ft of wild gorillas and whilst the lens isn't the quietest it didn't cause me any problems at all - I got no adverse reactions at all.
All in all, I think the Tamron is a cracking lens.
Hope that helps!
Cheers,
Annette
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Cameras: 2x K20D/D-BG2 | K10D/D-BG2 | *istD
Prime: Pentax FA50 | Sigma 105 Macro | Pentax DA*300
Zoom: Samsung 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 | Pentax 18-250 | Tamron 28-75 | Pentax DA*50-135 | Tamron 70-200 | Sigma 170-500
T/C: Tamron 1.4x | Pentax 1.7x AF
Flash: Pentax AF-540FGZ
PP: MacBook | iMac | Aperture
Prime: Pentax FA50 | Sigma 105 Macro | Pentax DA*300
Zoom: Samsung 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 | Pentax 18-250 | Tamron 28-75 | Pentax DA*50-135 | Tamron 70-200 | Sigma 170-500
T/C: Tamron 1.4x | Pentax 1.7x AF
Flash: Pentax AF-540FGZ
PP: MacBook | iMac | Aperture
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:57
Link
RR wrote:
Will a TC (Sigma or otherwise), when used with my Sigma 70mm 1:1 Macro, convert it to an effectively 140mm 2:1 Macro or will it be a 140mm 1:1 ?
The TC only doubles the focal length but you will keep your focus range, the subject will be 2 times as big at the same focus distance so you're right.
Will a TC (Sigma or otherwise), when used with my Sigma 70mm 1:1 Macro, convert it to an effectively 140mm 2:1 Macro or will it be a 140mm 1:1 ?
Posted 11/05/2009 - 00:45
Link
Thanks all for your replies. Has given me more to consider. I think the new body announcement may complicate things further though.
Quote:
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Glad you're enjoying it, I hope it IS mint rather than WAS mint
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Posted 11/05/2009 - 05:25
Link
RR wrote:
Thanks all for your replies. Has given me more to consider. I think the new body announcement may complicate things further though.
Yes. It is still in mint condition! Thanks all for your replies. Has given me more to consider. I think the new body announcement may complicate things further though.
Quote:
PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
Glad you're enjoying it, I hope it IS mint rather than WAS mint PS I believe that my other half bought me your Tamron 28-75 and it is great - a really good companion to the 70-200. It was in mint condition.
I suspect that you are right with regard to the K7 making things complicated! Shame my birthday is so close to Christmas!
Cameras: 2x K20D/D-BG2 | K10D/D-BG2 | *istD
Prime: Pentax FA50 | Sigma 105 Macro | Pentax DA*300
Zoom: Samsung 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 | Pentax 18-250 | Tamron 28-75 | Pentax DA*50-135 | Tamron 70-200 | Sigma 170-500
T/C: Tamron 1.4x | Pentax 1.7x AF
Flash: Pentax AF-540FGZ
PP: MacBook | iMac | Aperture
Prime: Pentax FA50 | Sigma 105 Macro | Pentax DA*300
Zoom: Samsung 12-24 | Tamron 17-50 | Pentax 18-250 | Tamron 28-75 | Pentax DA*50-135 | Tamron 70-200 | Sigma 170-500
T/C: Tamron 1.4x | Pentax 1.7x AF
Flash: Pentax AF-540FGZ
PP: MacBook | iMac | Aperture
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1030 posts
17 years
South Wales,
UK
I'm leaning toward getting a 70-200mm f2.8 & a 2x TC so that I can have a stab at street candids & fit the TC for some wildlife shots. Now, although the Sigma 70-200mm looks somewhat softer & has more CA at the longer end than the Tamron, the HSM would prove very valuable I would think (draw less attention in street & not scare wildlife in the field). I'm a little confused as to its compatibility with TC's though. - a few questions if you will:
Will only a Sigma 2X TC retain the HSM AF & give accurate metering, or will any other currently available TC do the job ?
If it is only Sigma, is there a special model no. or denomination I need to look out for ?
Will a TC (Sigma or otherwise), when used with my Sigma 70mm 1:1 Macro, convert it to an effectively 140mm 2:1 Macro or will it be a 140mm 1:1 ?
Anyone have the answers please ?
Cheers, Bob