Another adventure with the DA*50-135
Posted 07/07/2009 - 22:35
Link
I really like Nr.5. But as a suggestion...... I would have cloned away the In-focus branch in the top right corner (it stands out to much) and desaturated the girls shirt. Only leaving her hair and trousers with a hint of colour.
I think the picture will be more balanced that way.
Martin.
I think the picture will be more balanced that way.
Martin.
Posted 07/07/2009 - 22:58
Link
Posted 08/07/2009 - 00:52
Link
Posted 08/07/2009 - 03:24
Link
I really like the composition and the mood of no1, it looks great in B&W its only negative comment is that the eyes and or face is not in focus a bit more.
The tweaked version of no3 is the best i think, and I like the hoverfly shot.
The butterfly doesn't work for me in that style, I think its because the butterfly its self isn't colourful enough co go with the vibrant green of the leaf (maybe with a red admiral or a peacock the colour would have been there?) Also the blurred background is a little weird did you do it? There is a blade of grass thats out of focus but casts a shadow on the in focus leaf.
All IMO though
Regards
PaulM
PS. I take it the tamron is on the shelf gathering dust?
The tweaked version of no3 is the best i think, and I like the hoverfly shot.
The butterfly doesn't work for me in that style, I think its because the butterfly its self isn't colourful enough co go with the vibrant green of the leaf (maybe with a red admiral or a peacock the colour would have been there?) Also the blurred background is a little weird did you do it? There is a blade of grass thats out of focus but casts a shadow on the in focus leaf.
All IMO though
Regards
PaulM
PS. I take it the tamron is on the shelf gathering dust?
All cameras are equal but.....
Some are more equal than others
Some are more equal than others
Posted 08/07/2009 - 08:11
Link
They look pretty good to me. The No 3 looks stunning to me with the back light and the hair with that bit of lighting around shining at it. But I would have preferred still if eyes were in focus. Did you do it purposely that way or you missed the focus?
The one walking away that you have re-edited after Martin's advice looks stunning, its worth making a poster and hanging on the wall .
Hoverfly? ahhhh its absoluely fabulous, am so green with envy .
Well done, seems that lens is an absolute stunner
The one walking away that you have re-edited after Martin's advice looks stunning, its worth making a poster and hanging on the wall .
Hoverfly? ahhhh its absoluely fabulous, am so green with envy .
Well done, seems that lens is an absolute stunner
Amin Photo Gallery
Posted 08/07/2009 - 08:56
Link
Nice effects Bob. I like the original one of your daughter walking away from the camera best. I suppose cloning the branch out is a slight improvement, but I still like it as it is.
The grass on the gate is also nice.
shim
The grass on the gate is also nice.
shim
Posted 08/07/2009 - 10:09
Link
Cheers guys!
It's funny Paul - I thought exactly the same thing with regards to the butterfly about 10 mins ago, to add a red hue, i'll have to give that a bash. The background of that shot was not forced to be blurry in PP - I was shooting at f2.8 for all of these (I love the fact that this lens is tack sharp wide open). If I'd have stepped down and the entire shot was sharp, I personally think that it would have been too much.
The focus on the grass in front of Molly was deliberate - to have the grass sharp. I quite liked the effect, but I wanted to have the grass in colour to emphasise it further.
Amin, the hoverfly shot you grabbed on that eventful day of yours recently with the 60-250 trumps mine from a great height in my opinion, (especially because it was in flight) but i'll admit that your shot was the reason I tried to do one myself. I was lucky that one had landed - much easier stationary, but not as impressive IMO.
It's funny Paul - I thought exactly the same thing with regards to the butterfly about 10 mins ago, to add a red hue, i'll have to give that a bash. The background of that shot was not forced to be blurry in PP - I was shooting at f2.8 for all of these (I love the fact that this lens is tack sharp wide open). If I'd have stepped down and the entire shot was sharp, I personally think that it would have been too much.
The focus on the grass in front of Molly was deliberate - to have the grass sharp. I quite liked the effect, but I wanted to have the grass in colour to emphasise it further.
Amin, the hoverfly shot you grabbed on that eventful day of yours recently with the 60-250 trumps mine from a great height in my opinion, (especially because it was in flight) but i'll admit that your shot was the reason I tried to do one myself. I was lucky that one had landed - much easier stationary, but not as impressive IMO.
Posted 08/07/2009 - 10:19
Link
Great set of images Bob.
Love the 'new' version of number 5 and like the focus and effect of no.3.
As for the hoverfly... it's superb, cracking shot!
ali
Love the 'new' version of number 5 and like the focus and effect of no.3.
As for the hoverfly... it's superb, cracking shot!
ali
Cheers
Ali
ist* DS & Ricoh GR
Ali
ist* DS & Ricoh GR
Posted 08/07/2009 - 13:34
Link
Cheers Ali.
I'll post a re-working of the butterfly shot soon.
I'll post a re-working of the butterfly shot soon.
Posted 08/07/2009 - 16:47
Link
1 and 5 for me Bob. No1 has definitely got to have a place one the wall, nice tones and composition, I like the way your daughter is looking away from the camera, and the fact that her face is just out of focus makes the shot I think.
Great work again Bob.
Great work again Bob.
Posted 08/07/2009 - 18:36
Link
Cheers Cliff!
I had a bash at making the butterfly more red, and it ended up looking like old b&w footage does when it has been coloured in - obviously fake.
I'll give that effort up methinks...
I had a bash at making the butterfly more red, and it ended up looking like old b&w footage does when it has been coloured in - obviously fake.
I'll give that effort up methinks...
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.




1969 posts
17 years
Chester
Not entirely sure if some of them work, but that's what experimenting is all about!
My website (Hadfield Photography)
Pentax Gallery Artist page:link
Flickr Photostream: link