And another K-7 review
Posted 04/09/2009 - 20:26
Link
not bad, but does say noise is worse than the k20d
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Posted 04/09/2009 - 20:45
Link
scottthehat wrote:
not bad, but does say noise is worse than the k20d
Here is a ISO RAW test linknot bad, but does say noise is worse than the k20d
Noise is worse, certainly in the dark parts but when comparing the numbers on the scale the K7 wins compared to the K20D so it's hard to say which one is better.
With a noise reduction software you might get a better result with the K7 photos then with the K20D but that's just speculating of course.
You can download the raw file and test that, will have a go
Still haven't installed photoshop and the needed plugins
Stefan
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Posted 04/09/2009 - 21:09
Link
Anvh wrote:
Noise is worse, certainly in the dark parts but when comparing the numbers on the scale the K7 wins compared to the K20D so it's hard to say which one is better.
With a noise reduction software you might get a better result with the K7 photos then with the K20D but that's just speculating of course.
You can download the raw file and test that, will have a go
Still haven't installed photoshop and the needed plugins
will be interesting, but all in all, all 4 cameras did very well
scottthehat wrote:
not bad, but does say noise is worse than the k20d
Here is a ISO RAW test linknot bad, but does say noise is worse than the k20d
Noise is worse, certainly in the dark parts but when comparing the numbers on the scale the K7 wins compared to the K20D so it's hard to say which one is better.
With a noise reduction software you might get a better result with the K7 photos then with the K20D but that's just speculating of course.
You can download the raw file and test that, will have a go
Still haven't installed photoshop and the needed plugins
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
10412 posts
18 years
Dordrecht,
the Netherlands
It's a very big review and a positive one, almost all the features and aspect are reviewed.
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ