Ageing beauty

prsjnb
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:01 Link
Just another flower picture or something more? Captured with K20D and Sigma 24mm Super-wide II. Constructive C&C would be much appreciated.

Comment Image[img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5269/5613084595_0c064665c6_b.jpg" class="comment_image" />

Ageing beauty by prsjnb, on Flickr[/img]

Jon
johnwhit
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:04 Link
Lovely capture, cracking lens the Sigma 24mm

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
geordie01
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:14 Link
flipping fantastic
Edited by geordie01: 12/04/2011 - 17:14
aliengrove
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:16 Link
Don't see much wrong with that, perhaps the stamen could be less central, but it looks great as it is. I have the same lens, it's one of my favorites.
Pentaxophile
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:20 Link
It's very sharp as you'd expect of that little gem of a lens, but I'm afraid to me it's 'just another flower shot' although it's nicely taken. There's just a little bit going on, the flowers are imperfect but not interestingly so, and the light is quite strong. I would try and isolate the bloom a bit better, perhaps going in a bit closer.
johnwhit
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:24 Link
aliengrove wrote:
Don't see much wrong with that, perhaps the stamen could be less central, but it looks great as it is. I have the same lens, it's one of my favorites.
I love the way you can get in close with the Sigma 24mm, get 1:4 magnification and retain plenty of DoF without stopping right down to f/11 and beyond, makes a great walk around lens as well IMHO.

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
aliengrove
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:45 Link
I bought mine at the same time I got a 50mm f1.4, and I use the Sigma far more often, great focal length, semi-macro, and great results.
johnriley
Posted 12/04/2011 - 17:49 Link
Two things strike me about this. One is that the background is very busy, so I'd be looking for a wider aperture if possible. The second is that the white petals are totally burnt out. The solution for the latter is different lighting. My favourite lighting for flowers is bright overcast, even lightly raining, and the flower will glow...full sunlight is just a little harsh.
Best regards, John
Algernon
Posted 12/04/2011 - 18:12 Link
johnriley wrote:
Two things strike me about this. One is that the background is very busy, so I'd be looking for a wider aperture if possible. The second is that the white petals are totally burnt out. The solution for the latter is different lighting. My favourite lighting for flowers is bright overcast, even lightly raining, and the flower will glow...full sunlight is just a little harsh.
Just hold a diffuser over the flower?

Edit: I think your monitor need calibrating John

I've just checked and only 45 pixels in the whole picture reach a burnt out RGB level of 255
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Edited by Algernon: 12/04/2011 - 18:20
johnwhit
Posted 12/04/2011 - 18:25 Link
Doesn't look burnt out to me either, I can see detail in the white petals, clearly.

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
Pentaxophile
Posted 12/04/2011 - 18:38 Link
Algernon wrote:


Edit: I think your monitor need calibrating John

I've just checked and only 45 pixels in the whole picture reach a burnt out RGB level of 255
That's good news as it should be possible to tweak the levels to bring out more detail and modelling in the petals. Can't really see it at the moment though, unless I squint and angle my monitor!
prsjnb
Posted 12/04/2011 - 18:53 Link
johnriley wrote:
The second is that the white petals are totally burnt out.
Normally, John, I wouldn't presume to contradict, but in this case I feel I must:

Comment Image[img]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5107/5613401157_c3b4fce426.jpg" class="comment_image" />

Histogram for Ageing beauty by prsjnb, on Flickr[/img]

As noted by others, definitely no clipping of the whites/highlights (histogram from processed 16-bit TIFF file prior to JPEG conversion).

Jon
Edited by prsjnb: 12/04/2011 - 18:53
MarkTaylor
Posted 12/04/2011 - 19:09 Link
Only the lower half of the fourth petal (counting from the left) appears burnt out to me. The rest, although bright, have quite a bit of detail for the most part. :

Anyway I would agree it would be better if the background was not so busy.
My Flickr • Pentax K-5 • K-5 II • Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 DC HSM • Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD ASL • SMC Pentax-DA* 50-135mm F/2.8 ED [IF] SDM • SMC Pentax-DA 55-300mm F/4-5.8 ED • SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 ED AL [IF] WR • Vivitar 100mm F/3.5 Macro AF • Metz Mecablitz 58 AF-2
Edited by MarkTaylor: 12/04/2011 - 19:11
johnwhit
Posted 12/04/2011 - 19:13 Link
MarkTaylor wrote:
Only the lower half of the fourth petal (counting from the left) appears burnt out to me. The rest, although bright, have quite a bit of detail for the most part. :
I'd concur with that.

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
paulyrichard
Posted 12/04/2011 - 23:12 Link
PentaxExpert is not gonna' be pleased with this image!
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt

http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo