K20D highlight recovery
Posted 22/10/2008 - 19:19
Link
According to my real life tests, it seems d-range helps when shooting in bright conditions, but may introduce noise in shadowy places. I usually shoot jpegs so when I need to try get some blown details back to life I use Paint.net's shadow/highlight recovery tool, which often does a good job.
Best regards,
Tobio
K20d with Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 Di SP macro , smc da 18-55 mm, smc da 50-200 mm and smc da 55-300 mm + Metz 58 af-1. Editing with Pentax Photolab, Gimp and Paint.net.
Tobio
K20d with Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 Di SP macro , smc da 18-55 mm, smc da 50-200 mm and smc da 55-300 mm + Metz 58 af-1. Editing with Pentax Photolab, Gimp and Paint.net.
Posted 25/10/2008 - 14:58
Link
I use the D-range setting at ISO200 for Macro shots with flash and have been finding it very useful. It helps preserve details that I can pull out in PP and because the lens is so sharp at macro distances the additional noise seems better controlled. When I've used d-range with more general wildlife shots I've found that, although it can help preserve highlights, it simply adds too much noise and can easily ruin shots.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1469 posts
22 years
Rostock,
Germany
As I was giving my new 16-50 a spin yesterday I thought I should give it a try. Before showing the results I have to state that I was shooting at 2.8 (i.e. wide open) as I was testing the lens. So the 100% crops are not sharp, this is because they are out of focus, not because my 16-50 copy is crap. I left EXIF intact.
Here is the test subject, correct exposure (+0.5 EV):
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4173.jpg[/IMG]
You will see in the crops that some areas are blown already.
Here's almost the same shots, now with +2.5 EV:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4175a.jpg[/IMG]
And this is the same shot developed in SilkyPix with -1.9 EV:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4175.jpg[/IMG]
Now a 100% of the lighthouse top. First the correct shot:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4173100pu.jpg[/IMG]
and the overexposed (then recovered) one:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4175100pu.jpg[/IMG]
Same for the lower portion. Correct exposure (already I needed to apply some highlight recovery in SilkyPix):
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4173100lu.jpg[/IMG]
and the bright one:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_RDP4175100pl.jpg[/IMG]
Remember, these are not sharp as I focused on the central portion of the lighthouse with 2.8 aperture.
It's not magic, there are some areas where the recovery wasn't fully possible. But I am impressed how well this shot, overexposed by two stops, could be pulled back.
The bad thing is that I didn't take any shots with D-range disabled. So there's some work left to be done.
Prieni
Prieni's PPG page