*Ltd or Body Upgrade?
A DA21mm came up recently and I was thinking of going for it, but as desirable as it is, my 16-45 is pretty good at 21mm, and if I want to travel light, I have a 24mm MF prime.
I had his da 35 it was delivered in very good condition.
Jim
But is it a genuine step up from the K200d? The improvements seem more marginal than if I went for the K-7. Some k-x test images seem a bit soft - but that's possibly the noise reduction in jpeg mode.
>>>Thanks Jim - that's cheaper than the one I was looking at!
Jim
There are a couple of exceptions. First, if you are very active the ergonomics, especially the dual dial system, of the K10D / K20D / K-7 might be a big improvement. Second, if there are particular features you need that are not available in your current body. Like the intervalometer in the K20D or video in the K-7.
The best answer is usually: buy glass. Lenses keep their value better and do not go out of style. Whereas there is always a new body just around the corner.
Regards,
John
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6794 posts
17 years
Nottingham
My quandary is whether to get one of those da*Ltd lenses I have been lusting after - the 15 or 21mm, or upgrade to a K-7 body. I find the DA* pancakes very desirable, but with the 15 and the 21mm, my 16-45mm zoom does also offer reasonably similar iq although with the drawback of size and weight. The K-7 would seem to offer better high iso and faster performance than my K200d so there would be a more obvious advantage.
I can always indulge my love of primes with A and M lenses, which I think look the part on a K-7 (always thought little primes looked strange on K200/K20ds).