Search results for 'sensor cleaning' - page 566
Festivals with the Pentax 67II
Stunning photo, must be quite a challenge carrying the 6x7 everywhere, can you even hand-held those cameras? What does the camera give you here that a digital crop of FF cannot? Come guys stop using these terms so loosely, crop and FF does not mean a thing about what sensor size it is. For exa...
Posted by Anvh on 07/05/2010 - 18:35
Festivals with the Pentax 67II
Come guys stop using these terms so loosely, crop and FF does not mean a thing about what sensor size it is. For example a crop sensor like the APS-C is larger than a Full Frame 101-format sensor, even the 645D has a crop sensor but it's larger then FF 135-format sensor. Stefan, Fortunately a l...
Posted by Mike-P on 07/05/2010 - 19:14
Festivals with the Pentax 67II
I agree that image has a depth of quality to it that I wouldn't expect from a crop sensor but then again I expect I would be readily fooled. Damn it all this talk of MF just as some people who shall remain nameless are persuading me to revert to film. I recall the pleasure my £15 Rollei TLR gave ...
Posted by mikew on 07/05/2010 - 20:01
Festivals with the Pentax 67II
I agree that image has a depth of quality to it that I wouldn't expect from a crop sensor but then again I expect I would be readily fooled. Damn it all this talk of MF just as some people who shall remain nameless are persuading me to revert to film. I recall the pleasure my £15 Rollei TLR gave ...
Posted by hefty1 on 07/05/2010 - 20:08
Festivals with the Pentax 67II
Wow! Thanks for all the comments. A few answers... One reason to use medium format film is that the larger the piece of film (or the larger the sensor) the more detail you can capture and the gradations of colour are smoother. Does this matter when printing smaller photos - no. Does it matter ...
Posted by travel67 on 09/05/2010 - 12:08
contemplating 6x7 on K10
Focal length always stays the same so a 300mm 6x7 lens will preform like a 300mm 35mm lens on your 35mm film camera. I think that's all you wanted to know. This a bit extra: The effective focal length you mentioned is I believe the equivalent focal length. It's the same the effect that a len...
Posted by Anvh on 13/06/2010 - 20:00
Suggestions for a backpack for Pentax 67 II Kit
Hi again, Now that I have the start of a Pentax 67 II kit I'm now realising that my old Lowepro backpack just won't be able to accommodate this equipment. The kit I currently have is: * P67II Body + AE Prism * Lenses: 45mm, 55mm, 75mm, 105mm, 165mm and 200mm * Filters (Lee ND Grads...
Posted by rickbehl on 03/08/2010 - 06:12
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
Here it is compared to the 3 high-end 135format cameras from Canon and Nikon. Compared to 2 MF that cost ate least 2 times as much.
Posted by Anvh on 26/10/2010 - 15:19
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
Here it is compared to the 3 high-end 135format cameras from Canon and Nikon. Compared to 2 MF that cost ate least 2 times as much. so overall it beats the canon 1dmk3 but not the nikon d3x.:oops: just looked again and it doesnt make sense the iso on the first page compared to the graph.
Posted by pentaxanne on 26/10/2010 - 17:03
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
Apparently it doesn't even have tethering :shock:
Posted by Mike-P on 26/10/2010 - 17:16
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
so overall it beats the canon 1dmk3 but not the nikon d3x.:oops: Yes and no. But the 645D is a MF camera and not a 135 format although it seems to be a mud blood to quote Harry Potter. just looked again and it doesnt make sense the iso on the first page compared to the graph. I think with the fi...
Posted by Anvh on 26/10/2010 - 17:41
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
I'm not sure this helps anyone's buying decision though - it doesn't really mean that much in terms of real world photography.
Posted by johnriley on 26/10/2010 - 17:46
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
The Dynamic Range is only the same as the K-x I've noticed before some cameras claim to go down to 50ISO and it's the same as 100ISO :shock: Naughty! Naughty! :wink:
Posted by Algernon on 26/10/2010 - 19:38
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
Only the same? When slides have a 5EV range and colour negative 7EV I think we're doing pretty well with all digital cameras....
Posted by johnriley on 26/10/2010 - 19:44
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
The Dynamic Range is only the same as the K-x I've noticed before some cameras claim to go down to 50ISO and it's the same as 100ISO :shock: Naughty! Naughty! :wink: yeah but iso 50 on the canon and nikon are about iso 80 and iso 100 is actually iso 80 to,
Posted by pentaxanne on 26/10/2010 - 19:45
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
yeah but iso 50 on the canon and nikon are about iso 80 and iso 100 is actually iso 80 to, There's still no difference between the 50 and 100 settings :shock::lol: The Canon ISO settings are way off 3200ISO is only 2166ISO :shock: The Pentax ISO settings are almost spot-on the best I've ever ...
Posted by Algernon on 26/10/2010 - 20:14
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
The Canon ISO settings are way off 3200ISO is only 2166ISO :shock: That's nothing Anyone have an idea what the camera is doing???
Posted by Anvh on 26/10/2010 - 22:03
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
I didn't refer to the DXO site prior to buying my istD, K10D or K7. Nor did I compare any of the above to Canon or Nikon. No doubt the 645D MkII will be even better (maybe a 643D as performance currently gets better with lower numbers). Quote; "But the 645D is a MF camera and not a 135 form...
Posted by K10D on 27/10/2010 - 05:46
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
The Canon ISO settings are way off 3200ISO is only 2166ISO :shock: That's nothing Anyone have an idea what the camera is doing??? It's only real ISO is 50 the rest are obtained digitally in the RAW to JPEG conversion.
Posted by Algernon on 27/10/2010 - 09:55
DXOmark review of the 645D sensor
Reviews are pretty pointless for Pentax Users, they only serve to let people go Ooo and Ahh over the specs of their intended purchase, just like I've been doing with the K5:oops: As Gary says, I never compared my istD and subsequent bodies to their Canon or Nikon counterparts, they all take good ...
Posted by fatspider on 27/10/2010 - 10:11
