Search results for 'back focus' - page 2677
Giverny, France
It's a nice picture and a lovely setting but the wrong time of day I feel - the sky facing you was too bright to ever hope to get a balanced exposure, whereas if the Sun had been at your back... Still, we can't always have perfect lighting or there'd be no fun in photography. :)
Posted by hefty1 on 26/05/2010 - 18:08
St Mary Magdalene Wreckie No1
Thanks HG its St Mary Magdelens church and nature reserve in East Ham East London only 10 mins away from me if that used to go on school trips there my infants and juniors was only a 5 min walk. Only rememvbered the place this morning:oops: Will go back when sun comes out to play again:P
Posted by ems82 on 26/05/2010 - 18:05
St Mary Magdalene Wreckie No1
It was with my samsung 18-55 no your right they not the sharpest shots but as I said was more a wreckie will be going back with tripod and choice of lenses and more time.
Posted by ems82 on 27/05/2010 - 11:07
Gallions reach Wreckie No2
Same scenerio as the church just looking for possible photo oppurtunitys. Will defo be going back here loads more to see and shoot:D Defo sme close ups of the bike if its still there:)
Posted by ems82 on 26/05/2010 - 18:02
Gallions reach Wreckie No2
The last one for me Emma, I like the perspective. If you do have time to go back, the 2nd last one might be further improved by shooting it in a similar way to the last one - not 'square on'. :)
Posted by i-Berg on 27/05/2010 - 08:37
Few from garden
Emma, In particular I like the fork shots: should go straight into your special reserve collection. You have a discerning eye for detail. The first flower shot is fine, the second one needs, I feel, either more or less depth of field: the nearest flowers are out of focus. Reshoot tomorrow usin...
Posted by bwlchmawr on 26/05/2010 - 18:36
Few from garden
I like the first fork shot very much, nice composition and shadow. The focus seems to be more on the rear tine though, it would have been nice if the handle was in focus.
Posted by thoughton on 26/05/2010 - 23:02
The marina at Roker in Sunderland
Thanks guys for the feed back and I have to agree Thoramay the photo would look more balaced had the shadow fell front and both sides of the rail. Ian
Posted by philstaff on 26/05/2010 - 23:31
The marina at Roker in Sunderland
Thanks guys for the feed back and I have to agree Thoramay the photo would look more balaced had the shadow fell front and both sides of the rail. Ian A well spotted and executed photograph. I like habours and boats they often offer loads of photo oppertunities. I don't know, but did Thoramay not m...
Posted by bforbes on 27/05/2010 - 09:39
The marina at Roker in Sunderland
Thanks guys for the feed back and I have to agree Thoramay the photo would look more balaced had the shadow fell front and both sides of the rail. Ian A well spotted and executed photograph. I like habours and boats they often offer loads of photo oppertunities. I don't know, but did Thoramay not m...
Posted by philstaff on 27/05/2010 - 14:27
Small Umbrella Fungus
The frist one is to wash out ..not enought focus...I do like the shot from the top though, drifferent angle are always nice. Interesting little pickly flower. Love the light shing through the mushroom .Well done.:D
Posted by darlene on 28/05/2010 - 01:50
Dancing queens
This image has been chosen by the client and to be produced in black and white. Dancing queens Now I've done many black and white conversions of this image but I just can't seem to to make it work or more to the fact I'm unhappy with the conversion I've been trying to convince myself...
Posted by pink on 27/05/2010 - 07:42
Dancing queens
I don't do portraits but I'm never short of an opinion! You've lost the top of the further girl's head and I think that's part of it. I tried a square crop losing the back of the closer girl's head to match the loss of the other girl's top of head. Then crop from left to lose very tip of the swir...
Posted by mikew on 27/05/2010 - 07:54
Dancing queens
I don't do portraits but I'm never short of an opinion! same here :lol: Well, actually I do an awful lot of lighting faces, but not for still photography... Anyway, I'd say the basic problem is the lighting on the two girls' faces - the one at the back is burnt-out on one side and the one at...
Posted by flossie on 27/05/2010 - 08:24
Dancing queens
This won't help your dilemma, but that picture which looked so lovely and sharp at the small size looks a bit out of focus at the larger size!! Looking at the top of her hair the focus seems to be on the back of the front girl's head? How large is this going to be printed? I prefer your first BW ...
Posted by thoughton on 27/05/2010 - 09:41
Dancing queens
I'm going with number one the first image and yes Tim the girl is out of focus but this is deliberate. James
Posted by pink on 27/05/2010 - 10:02
Dancing queens
just trying a bit of creativity the focus is meant to be on the front girl I also have a Image the other way round and one with a bigger DOF this shot was never meant to be seen my the customer let alone be printed. but it's the expression on the front girls face the client (mother love's) Jam...
Posted by pink on 27/05/2010 - 11:29
Dancing queens
I really love the shot, warts and all. My main problem is the soft focus on the girl behind. But I'd still be happy with it. This sort of thing is hard to get perfect!
Posted by bwlchmawr on 27/05/2010 - 18:17
Dancing queens
A3 sounds very large, won't the missed focus on the front girl be a bit obvious at that size? Sorry to bang on about this, I'm not trying to be difficult, just concerned the client might suddenly notice when it's huge?
Posted by thoughton on 27/05/2010 - 22:08
Dancing queens
Well I've now printed it and framed it and I must say it look's stunning the soft focus is spot on Tim and the new crop and D&B applied to the image has improved it as well thank you for all the help on this one. also as you suggested ken I have lightened the teeth and eye by 11% work's well, ...
Posted by pink on 28/05/2010 - 12:38
