Search results for 'back focus' - page 212
Going back to film
Digital may be "easier",what with uploading & processing but I have heard a few comments about digital lacking "grain". Now where`s my old OM10? Nic
Posted by alfiemooon on 26/09/2009 - 19:42
Going back to film
Every now and then I take my OM-1 and my 3 Zuiko's (28, 50 and 135) out for an airing. Nostalgic? Yes Lovely construction and feel? Yes Longevity and reliability? Yes Forces more thought and creativity? Probably Anything else? Not really Head, nail etc. (except I had a 28-80ish Tokina instea...
Posted by Oggy on 26/09/2009 - 21:46
Going back to film
Digital may be "easier",what with uploading & processing but I have heard a few comments about digital lacking "grain". It does. But I really don't think we'd want to go back to it. Trust me here. Else, send me your negs to scan, for a very reasonable fee. :)
Posted by ChrisA on 26/09/2009 - 22:38
Going back to film
Forces more thought and creativity? Probably Hey Oggy...if Carlsberg did photography,eh?...ha ha ha Nic (sorry,just my sense of humour)
Posted by alfiemooon on 26/09/2009 - 23:15
Going back to film
Forces more thought and creativity? Probably Hey Oggy...if Carlsberg did photography,eh?...ha ha ha Nic (sorry,just my sense of humour) Never mind Carlesberg, try one of these (but not two).
Posted by Oggy on 26/09/2009 - 23:34
Going back to film
Carlsberg don't do photography, but Asahi do, so I tried to check it out! :wink: The results were disappointing, even though it did say Asahi on the bottle, but the contents were much better! :lol:
Posted by RichardDay on 27/09/2009 - 09:24
Going back to film
I've said this before, I'm not going 'back' to film as I have never entirely left it! snap! :lol: Snap too!
Posted by gartmore on 27/09/2009 - 09:46
Going back to film
Carlsberg don't do photography, but Asahi do, so I tried to check it out! :wink: The results were disappointing, even though it did say Asahi on the bottle, but the contents were much better! :lol: Are you sure you took the cap off Richard :wink:
Posted by Oggy on 27/09/2009 - 14:00
Going back to film
Carlsberg don't do photography, but Asahi do, so I tried to check it out! :wink: The results were disappointing, even though it did say Asahi on the bottle, but the contents were much better! :lol: Are you sure you took the cap off Richard :wink: I'm not that daft! :P Contents in the glas...
Posted by RichardDay on 27/09/2009 - 17:07
Going back to film
No foam! :shock::mrgreen: The importance of foam differs greatly from beer type to beer type and from country to country. Thus in the South of England or America a beer containing relatively little foam is filled to the brim of the glass, whereas in most other European countries the glass is fil...
Posted by lidy on 27/09/2009 - 17:34
Going back to film
I thought that with the K20D I would more or less commit to digital...but as I have so many images to edit on my laptop, I'd go through the slide films lurking in the fridge... So, weekend before last I was using my MZ-S:D, and yesterday my Z-1:D:D Oh the joy of a large bright and clear viewfi...
Posted by Pwynnej on 28/09/2009 - 11:40
thorp perrow today
I'm most impressed by that flying Owl William, I took twenty shots and they were all blurred or out of focus, I must try harder :D. The ripple experiment has come, nice one.
Posted by Technoblurb on 27/09/2009 - 13:33
Pentax World Day October 10th, 2009
The WPD doesn't really have enough focus (no pun intended!) to interest me - I take shots every day anyway so there's nothing to really inspire me about a date in the same way as if I'm shooting for (for example) one of the competitions here. The sync snap thing is more interesting (to me) becaus...
Posted by hefty1 on 28/09/2009 - 23:30
Picasa 3.5 - I'm impressed!
So basically google get a free images library to sell as they want, passing no royalties they get back to the original photographer. Even if you remove things from the site they can still sell copies they 'backed up' It's clauses like this, buried in waffle that encourage me NOT to use on line...
Posted by Hardgravity on 28/09/2009 - 08:25
Do angles matter?
Nice shots K10, brought back some memories, In 1975 I sold my golf gear and gave up golf to buy more camera stuff, one of my first jobs was photographing a 3 day Italian conference in Aviemore Scotland, the first day's job was sitting at the first T taking photos of the golfers swings, I worked most...
Posted by jackitec on 28/09/2009 - 21:33
how to
Don't think you can, that would be like turning the mileage back on a car. Jack. :?
Posted by jackitec on 28/09/2009 - 21:50
Cheap Gimball Type Head...
Like most people who get into wildlife or aviation photography, and after acquiring a reasonably sized/heavy zoom lens, thoughts soon turn to supporting the thing. One thing I've learnt over the last few years is that even a 300mm lens needs proper support if you're going to get results anywhere ...
Posted by Tooks on 29/09/2009 - 09:35
Silkypix exif data question.
Sigma use the same code for several of their lenses, I think it's because they just copy stuff rather than licence it, some of their lenses report as Pentax lenses. I'm biased (:wink:) as I'm not a Sigma fan since owning several of their lenses and being dissatisfied with all of them. Do we know ...
Posted by RichardDay on 07/10/2009 - 12:56
ND filters... about to buy my first one.
A polariser would be useful doubling up as an ND filter and could be used with an ND as Martin suggests. I don't want to make it even more complicated for you Peter but a couple of pointers may save you some grief. I spent ages looking for the right polarising option a few months back - forum me...
Posted by mpjx on 01/10/2009 - 01:40
alone
You are best posting in Your Photos if you want feedback, the gallery is more a display area :wink: Having said that: At first glance, I like the idea, but to my mind the image is missing something. The roof beams look a little out of focus and there isn't enough in the dark area at the bottom to...
Posted by Father Ted on 01/10/2009 - 10:59
