philstaff

Joined: 27th April 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

philstaff
mikew wrote:
If you'll forgive em I would expect the image to be way sharper than this. It could be that in PP and resizing it's lost some sharpness but I find the 10-20 to be very sharp.

I like the way you used the ropes to lead in and the shape of the boat working with them but I suspect it might have been more dramatic if you had moved a little to the left and got lower. That would then have moved the line on the boat away from the shoreline in the background and minimised the space on the left (I think which at the moment is flat dead space).

I hope it was set at 10mm

Mike
Thanks Mike Im a bit concernd now re this lens for its sharpness.

Comment by philstaff posted on Sitting on the dock of the bay. at 22/06/2010 - 18:52

philstaff
dougf8 wrote:
Good lines taking the eye over the image.

But were the reds really that muted?
Took quite a few from the same angel and yes the reds are as is.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Sitting on the dock of the bay. at 22/06/2010 - 17:06

philstaff
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/ship2.jpg[/IMG]

Taken with the Sigma 10/20 on the K10.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Sitting on the dock of the bay. at 22/06/2010 - 15:20

philstaff
Dangermouse wrote:
Pentax-M 28mm f3.5. Buy one now, perfect focal length for APS-C and incredibly sharp even wide open.
Im always on the look out for these little gems.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Old v New at 21/06/2010 - 22:05

philstaff
JonSchick wrote:
I think some of the older lenses stand up remarkably well compared to their modern counterparts. I enjoy using them for the reasons that Jon mentioned above - they make you stop and think, and the proportion of decent shots increases as a result.

Ian, I don't know what you think of your 35mm f2.8, but I have one and consider it to be something of an unsung hero - it does exactly what I need of it and produces very good results time after time. I'd second others' opinions of the 50mm/1.7 and 20mm/4, and would add the 135/3.5 as a decent quality and very cost-effective medium telephoto.
Have not realy tried this one out to any extent Jon due to an illness recently but hope to get out and about soon.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Old v New at 21/06/2010 - 22:03

philstaff
Thanks Terry will take a look now.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Old v New at 21/06/2010 - 12:24

philstaff
Might be a daft question but here goes anyway do the old SMC M lenses give as good results as the newer modern day lenses. I ask this question as I have both the older 1.7 and the newer 1.4 50mm lenses and the 1.7 sometimes looks the sharper of the two. I also have the 28mm and 35mm older SMC M lenses but no comparision.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Old v New at 21/06/2010 - 12:01

philstaff
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/mn-2.jpg[/IMG]

Thanks for the feed back guys Im no PS wizzard but have taken on board your comments and come up with this.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Teesdale Landscape at 21/06/2010 - 11:18

philstaff
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/Teesdale6.jpg[/IMG]
Took with a SMC M 35mm on the K10.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Teesdale Landscape at 20/06/2010 - 12:29

philstaff
Have to say these old lenses offer great value for the money I have the 50mm 35mm and 28mm and love them all. It stretches you a little more as well when setting up the camara to take the photo.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Pentax SMC A lens 50mm 1:1.7 at 19/06/2010 - 09:50

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo