Comments made by pentaxanne - Page 17

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

is the rear af button in a different place on the k5, from the k7, I found it to be in an awfull place as i use the rear af button all the time instead of half prees.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on K5 users at 13/11/2010 - 10:47

thast very true mike maybe they had a duf lens, also the k5 is under exposed compared to the d7000 open up the jpegs and compare the blue watch face.

it the af i wanna know about, as for iso it looks cracking.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 12/11/2010 - 12:57

in raw the k5 has a lot less colour noise than the d7000, but more than the 7d, compare it to the 7d which looks better here than both, but also the nikon and canon are sharper.
in jpeg the at iso 12800 the k5,d7000.7d look close but i would say the 7d is first then the 7000d then the k5.

also it does not state if any noise reduction has been done it raw and jpeg.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 12/11/2010 - 12:45

amilner wrote:
Just seen this comparison widget on dpreview - compare RAW at high ISO and the K5 appears to be significantly better than the Canon D60 or the Nikon D7000 (by at least 1 stop)

looks very close between the nikon and pentax and the 60d.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 12/11/2010 - 11:39

i prefer the size of the k20, but found the performane of the k7 to be the same except low light af and af speed was better.
but the k5 is looking awsome or high iso, its just the af speed that bothers me know(needs to be faster than k7),

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 12/11/2010 - 11:34

Don wrote:

pentaxanne wrote:
its like the nikon d40 and k100d super same sensor, but the pentax is better, all comes down to how its tuned, nikon cant tune it to well as they want to stick it in the new d300(when it comes out then it will be better than the d7000.

built in redundancy to not compete with it's own line-up is plausible..... so maybe won't is better word than can't...

like i said nikon will bring out a new d300 with the same sensor (same if not slightly better iso than the k5) with there new metering 2,016-pixel RGB system, up the weather sealing and make it fire 10fps
and put a price of £1500 body only.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 22:33

its like the nikon d40 and k100d super same sensor, but the pentax is better, all comes down to how its tuned, nikon cant tune it to well as they want to stick it in the new d300(when it comes out then it will be better than the d7000.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 21:44

just proves dxo are duff, that shows the d7000 has better iso than the k5, which from what i have seen the k5 is atleast one stop better.
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/internet%20site%20200kb%20pics/3264_CROP_COMP.jpg[/IMG]

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 19:11

come on guys where the the pics to prove.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 18:18

Mike-P wrote:
Well mines just arrived .. so much for the delivery between 2pm and 3pm message on the couriers web site.

High ISO better be bloody amazing because it's pitch black outside now

will be interseting how you find the af speed mike.

Comment by pentaxanne posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 17:26

Proudly supporting Pentax User

pentaxanne

All Forum Comments

All Forum Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Proudly supporting Pentax User