All Forum Comments
Comment by niblue posted on Pentax 85mm f1.4 at 16/01/2006 - 22:31
I do however, have a small Cokin collection, for those times when an ND or grad is required. I also have a few polarisers.
Comment by niblue posted on Pentax 85mm f1.4 at 16/01/2006 - 18:53
Comment by niblue posted on Pentax 85mm f1.4 at 16/01/2006 - 11:44

I've very impressed with the lens so far and I'm looking forward to having it with me when I'm out and about with the camera.
Comment by niblue posted on My first macros with the ist at 03/02/2006 - 18:43
My wife bought some macro flower pictures which are in one of our bathrooms and I'm determined to replace them with some of my own!
Comment by niblue posted on My first macros with the ist at 30/01/2006 - 10:34
This is my sons left eye:

And for this one the flash was mounted on camera with a Lumiquest Promax fitted.

Comment by niblue posted on My first macros with the ist at 29/01/2006 - 18:15




The last is one of my wife's rings - she has very small fingers which should give some idea of the magnification. All shot handheld with the DS set at ISO 200, 1/125 and F22, an SMC-M 50mm F1.7 with various extension rings and a 400FTZ flash off-camera using the hot-shoe adaptor and extension cord.
I originally started using a tripod but I found it much easier to work handheld, setting the lens to its closest focus and moving the camera to achieve focus.
Comment by niblue posted on My first macros with the ist at 28/01/2006 - 20:17
By the way, I actually like the kit lens that came with the camera, and, at least for now, it's wide enough.
Comment by niblue posted on Sigma AF 28-300 HZ ASP? at 07/01/2006 - 09:39
28-300? There's no way you'll get decent quality from that wide a range. Pentax may make one, and it'll be far superior to the B list lenses.
Comment by niblue posted on Sigma AF 28-300 HZ ASP? at 07/01/2006 - 09:38
I tried a few mini-labs but the results were terrible.
Comment by niblue posted on Processing Kodak's 400ASA C-41 Black & White Film at 15/01/2006 - 17:23


can anybody reply on how the *FA 85 1.4 behaves on a digital pentax? I use it on a mz-s for theater work and am investigating when to go over to the digital platform for 35mm...
The only real difference on the digital body is that it's better to set the aperture on the camera body instead of using the aperture ring. You can still use the aperture ring if you want but the camera needs to be in manual mode to expose properly - you press the AE-L button and it stops down briefly to set exposure.