All Forum Comments
Comment by mtrafford posted on Pixels per dot...a printing question at 06/05/2011 - 22:55
This is probably not precisely on topic but some might find it interesting.
The default printing resolution that's usually quoted is 300 dpi, so an 8x10 would be 2400 x 3000 pixels. However, 300 dpi is what used to be requested by publishing houses for magazine reproduction. I always understood, and I haven't tested this, that it is better to have the printing resolution a divisor of the printer resolution. 300 doesn't go into 1440 but 360 does and that is why I've always used 360 when doing prints, with great success over the years.
The default printing resolution that's usually quoted is 300 dpi, so an 8x10 would be 2400 x 3000 pixels. However, 300 dpi is what used to be requested by publishing houses for magazine reproduction. I always understood, and I haven't tested this, that it is better to have the printing resolution a divisor of the printer resolution. 300 doesn't go into 1440 but 360 does and that is why I've always used 360 when doing prints, with great success over the years.
Comment by mtrafford posted on Pixels per dot...a printing question at 06/05/2011 - 11:27
Thanks very much everyone.
Comment by mtrafford posted on From the Scottish Borders at 06/05/2011 - 11:10
Hi everyone, brand new to PU so just dipping my feet in. I used to use an SP2, ESII and an LX, then on to Canon Digital with L lenses and now solely Pentax K7 and K5 for the past few months. I'll be sticking with Pentax, the advantages are too many to list and well known to everyone here. It's nice to be a Pentax owner again and be able to use a few lenses I used in the 90s on the LX.
Comment by mtrafford posted on From the Scottish Borders at 05/05/2011 - 13:37


link