MrCynical

Joined: 12th June 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MrCynical
CWyatt wrote:
But top of my list is a weather-sealed moderate wide, ideally 24mm f/1.8 WR. A great street lens for, in my opinion, the best street DSLR yet made - K7.
Would cost at least £500 if the Sigma (£420) is anything to go by.

Comment by MrCynical posted on What primes would we like to see? at 15/09/2010 - 21:31

MrCynical
johnriley wrote:
In 135 terms, these would be 36mm, 42mm and 202.5mm, none of which seem overly exciting to me (35mm, 43mm, 200mm)

Would you buy lenses of those particular lengths? Or, to put it another way, when (if) you used film, did you buy those lenses?
Some people presumably did, given the existence of the FA35, FA43 and FA*200.

rparmar wrote:
Where are the gaps?
In the sub-£350 range? (excluding the new lens of course)

Comment by MrCynical posted on What primes would we like to see? at 14/09/2010 - 15:03

MrCynical
An 18-135 would, assuming that it is decent optically, be a very useful lens indeed - especially WR. Where does it leave the 17-70 though? Even though a new kit lens wouldn't be as sharp as it, I'd personally take range and WR.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Possible K-5 Specs !! at 13/09/2010 - 22:24

MrCynical
pentaxanne wrote:
good luck paul, i think more and more people will leve pentax if they dont impove the af speed soon, its the major downside of pentax.
See Pentax K5

Comment by MrCynical posted on Leaving the Pentax fold at 13/09/2010 - 22:19

MrCynical
Mike-P wrote:
Went out yesterday morning with the K-7, came back to find I had shot virtually everything at ISO 3200

Actually they weren't THAT bad (grain wise) .. as for the content well that's another thing entirely.
Did exactly that with my graduation photos last year: handed my K20D to my folks on aperture priority and centre focus, forgetting that the previous night I'd been taking pictures of drinks cans and other such photographic paragons* and it was set to ISO 1600. The shots came out fine!

*At that stage my K20 was about a month old, so I was still in the "ooh new shiny thing, must press buttons" stage

Comment by MrCynical posted on hmmmmm anybody else have "moments" ? at 13/09/2010 - 22:16

MrCynical
TOZZA27 wrote:
Blimey ! He`s got more Pentax kit than me - lol
What are the odds that it's actually MikeP?

Comment by MrCynical posted on Any good as a supplier at 13/09/2010 - 22:13

MrCynical
Dangermouse wrote:
To me, any halfway decent new AF prime for £150-£180 is a good deal. I've seen used F 50mm f1.7s priced higher than that!
I would hazard a guess that those selling 50 1.7s might be slightly worried right now: a DA L 50 f1.7 is the logical next step after a 35mm.

Comment by MrCynical posted on DA-L 35mm f2.4 announced at 12/09/2010 - 23:27

MrCynical
greynolds999 wrote:
What Pentax really need are much faster SDMs. There's no point in the camera getting the focus faster if the lens can't keep up.
They can't do that without developing ring-SDM - which would mean "MkII" versions of every SDM lens. At the moment Pentax SDM (even in the £1000+ DA* lenses) works the same as Canon's "micro USM" which only goes in their cheaper lenses.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Possible K-5 Specs !! at 11/09/2010 - 13:46

MrCynical
Hardgravity wrote:
It's been bugging me all day, this lens is being called a KIT/STANDARD lens.
Kit because it's DAL (and will likely come in a premium 'triple kit' with the Kr), standard because it's normalish (roughly the same view as a 50mm standard lens on film)

Comment by MrCynical posted on DA-L 35mm f2.4 announced at 11/09/2010 - 02:30

MrCynical
Dangermouse wrote:
I don't really see what that blog's point is about it being similar to the 35mm f2. That's a very well-regarded lens, and Pentax are offering what APS-C cameras need here - a cheap, standard focal length prime. I don't think any of the competitors offer such a thing?
The point is, I think, why did Pentax cancel the FA 35mm f2 (which was a very well regarded lens) in the first place, only to replace it with something slower at the same price? Of course if it's devilishly sharp across the frame from f2.4 then the lesser bokeh potential (compared to the FA and compared to Canikon) might be forgivable.

Comment by MrCynical posted on DA-L 35mm f2.4 announced at 10/09/2010 - 17:23

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo